Search found 16 matches

by NewtonCentre
Sat Aug 02, 2008 7:01 pm
Forum: ATS Question Forum
Topic: Expect higher clearance
Replies: 23
Views: 2121

Re: Expect higher clearance

It is always our assumption that the pilot wants to depart as soon as possible. The most expeditious way to get an aircraft off the ground, is to give a clearance to the lowest IFR altitude available and sort out the additional separational requirements (to get you higher) once you're in the air. If...
by NewtonCentre
Wed Jul 16, 2008 5:25 am
Forum: ATS Question Forum
Topic: Expect higher clearance
Replies: 23
Views: 2121

Re: Expect higher clearance

MANOPS 431.1 Include one or more of the following items in an altitude assignment: E. The time or location to expect higher altitude when it is not practicable to initially assign an operationally suitable altitude or flight level. NOTE 431.1 E The following may be considered operationally suitable...
by NewtonCentre
Thu Nov 15, 2007 8:55 pm
Forum: WestJet
Topic: Minimum Vectoring Altitudes (MVA) issued by ATC
Replies: 7
Views: 1733

Wordstwice: We can definately just clear you to the CYLW 100NM safe altitude of 12,600 and then the approach. The problem with this is that in nice weather, you might be level at 12,600 for quite a while and wanting to cancel IFR, but at 12,600 you aren't allowed to. The 100nm safe from Kamloops is ...
by NewtonCentre
Thu Nov 15, 2007 4:45 pm
Forum: WestJet
Topic: Minimum Vectoring Altitudes (MVA) issued by ATC
Replies: 7
Views: 1733

Minimum Vectoring Altitudes (MVA) issued by ATC

We've long been told not to clear aircraft to MVAs when they are not on vectors. We (as controllers) have gotten around this by giving approaches early, and informing the pilot what the MVA is (ie cleared to CYLW for an RNAV RNP RWY 16 APP, MVA 8,300 until IGSOB). Other controlers have used the phra...
by NewtonCentre
Mon Nov 12, 2007 1:37 pm
Forum: WestJet
Topic: RNP Prince George
Replies: 9
Views: 1805

Great info guys - CCR - I think it's actually a great practice to state your intentions on initial contact - then we don't spend a minute going back and forth trying to figure out where you want to go. For CYLW, coming from the west, we almost always clear aircraft to a point on the approach (IGSOB,...
by NewtonCentre
Fri Nov 09, 2007 1:11 pm
Forum: WestJet
Topic: Westjet into CYKA and YEG to YXS?
Replies: 5
Views: 1229

Westjet into CYKA and YEG to YXS?

About a year ago we were given Westjet RNP approach plates to study for WJ flights into Kamloops (CYKA) - but still no flights. Does anybody know if/when these are planned to start? Also, today we saw a WJ flight Edmonton direct Prince George - is this a new scheduled flight? I couldn't find it list...
by NewtonCentre
Fri Nov 09, 2007 10:54 am
Forum: WestJet
Topic: RNP Prince George
Replies: 9
Views: 1805

I'm ATC (YVR ACC) and control the yxs sector. Right now even the RNP33 is not available (by notam), which is a pain for us and you that we have to send you all the way around via the VOR. Otherwise, Go Guns we can actually get you down to 5600 ASL (3400 AGL) around voles, or even lower if we vector ...
by NewtonCentre
Wed Sep 19, 2007 3:35 pm
Forum: ATS Question Forum
Topic: What does radar identified mean to me?
Replies: 9
Views: 2253

Also, of interest to a pilot, if we have you on radar, and you would like to change altitude or go direct somewhere, there is much more chance that ATC will be able to grant your request. If you are not on radar, the separation standards are much different and it's possible that we won't be able to ...
by NewtonCentre
Sun Sep 16, 2007 4:03 am
Forum: ATS Question Forum
Topic: Cancelling IFR?
Replies: 10
Views: 4189

The way we see it as ATC is that if you're closing your plan - we are no longer responsible for alerting. We take your strip off our board and assume that your company will make sure that you arrive safely. If you cancel IFR and keep your flight plan open, we no longer provide separation for you, bu...
by NewtonCentre
Sun Sep 16, 2007 3:45 am
Forum: ATS Question Forum
Topic: Renamed: "Rude controllers"/Protected airspace
Replies: 56
Views: 8099

If an aircraft with a non-certified gps is cleared direct, airport to airport, off radar instead of using airways - one must protect 90nm of airspace. This has been said already. I would not clear an aircraft direct under these circumstances because it makes it very difficult to climb/descend aircra...
by NewtonCentre
Sat Sep 15, 2007 4:03 am
Forum: ATS Question Forum
Topic: Renamed: "Rude controllers"/Protected airspace
Replies: 56
Views: 8099

The most important variable, as cpl_atc said, is whether of not the aircraft is on RADAR. I have asked pilots who are /S (we call it slant-stupid) if they are able direct xxxxx. I have only asked this in a RADAR environment and that is because I don't feel like monitoring a vector for half an hour w...
by NewtonCentre
Sun Sep 09, 2007 12:26 pm
Forum: ATS Question Forum
Topic: Renamed: "Rude controllers"/Protected airspace
Replies: 56
Views: 8099

it'sme : Good point - we do make mistakes. I couldn't imagine getting miffed at someone if I'd cleared someone to a decomissioned navaid though, but I'm sure it happened...
by NewtonCentre
Sun Sep 09, 2007 1:12 am
Forum: ATS Question Forum
Topic: Transponder in uncontrolled airspace
Replies: 36
Views: 8244

If you are given a discreet code by an FSS, then we don't see your data tag on our radar screens, so I don't really care if you keep your code or not. There have been times where I'm passing traffic and I notice that the aircraft involved (who I'm not talking to) has a discreet code. In this case, I...
by NewtonCentre
Sun Sep 09, 2007 12:57 am
Forum: ATS Question Forum
Topic: Squawk 1200 when you cancel IFR?
Replies: 10
Views: 7286

Keep your code please. The only time that I may ask a pilot to switch to 1200 is if they're near the border. If an aircraft is landing at an airport near the US border, and they've cancelled, it's an easy way for our cousins down south to know that it's a VFR aircraft approaching the border. Otherwi...
by NewtonCentre
Sun Sep 09, 2007 12:50 am
Forum: ATS Question Forum
Topic: Renamed: "Rude controllers"/Protected airspace
Replies: 56
Views: 8099

It's very likely the controller was having a check ride (QA) at the time. We get QAs at least twice a year. A supervisor sits behind us, transmisions are recorded on CDs and placed in our file, and a report is filled out that we have to sign. I get bad readbacks all the time from pilots, but it's a ...
by NewtonCentre
Sun Sep 09, 2007 12:37 am
Forum: ATS Question Forum
Topic: Flying the published missed when on a visual approach?
Replies: 7
Views: 2165

In the cases that I've seen, visual approaches are only issued in good VMC weather. This being the case, there is most likely what we call "auto overs" in effect with the tower in question. This means that as soon as the aircraft enters the control zone, the aircraft becomes towers control instead o...

Go to advanced search