Didn't they have to create it in time for the Osprey? There was also someone (recently) trying to make a homebuilt with four two-stroke engines, but it never got off the ground, so to speak.

Apollo wrote:...Just don't do anything suspicious

Or they might send some of these guys after you, whoever they are:
viewtopic.php?f=54&t=65575

http://www.cyow.ca/

ATC feed.

http://www.tc.gc.ca/aviation/applicatio ... RCRAFT.TXT
GNXB 3 BELL TEXTRON - CAN 412 46488 2010-01-25 NAYLOR CONRAD J

Brewguy wrote: Sounds very 'cloak & daggar'.

Seems rather excessive for just "ground training support" . They don't want Canadians to know that they actually try to keep their skills up?

I believe the word I'm looking for is... Anyway...

Or proficiency in general:
http://news.globaltv.com/Passengers+dan ... story.html

Well I figured I was going to get some odd responses.

Are you being serious? Wouldn't they use a non-flight worthy plane for that?

I know Nav Canada has some jets that they use for nav-aid testing, but what does Transport Canada use their Citations and King Airs for?

I found the answer right after I posted. (100 yrs of aviation)

I was going to ask what they would possibly need a GA float plane for, but now I'm not sure what kind of answers I would get...

What is the logo on near the tail? IOO? What does that stand for?

http://www.jetphotos.net/photolink.php?id=6620820