Search found 6 matches
- Sun Oct 27, 2013 12:19 pm
- Forum: WestJet
- Topic: WJE Flow through
- Replies: 94
- Views: 41299
Re: WJE Flow through
Not trying to sound... well I don't know, but this sounds like anybody who's got lots of 705 PIC time on several types or so is really put in a bad spot here. Looks next to impossible to go to mainline direct. I never got a mention for direct entry captain and now seem way too over qualified for a Q...
- Fri Jan 20, 2012 1:46 pm
- Forum: Air Canada
- Topic: PFO letter: The Actual wording (good vs bad)
- Replies: 19
- Views: 7570
Re: PFO letter: The Actual wording (good vs bad)
Well mine said:
All applicants are welcome to re-apply in 6 months. We encourage you to keep your online application up-to-date...
We appreciate the time you took to meet with us... We wish you much sucess in your future endeavors and career.
Seems to say both.
All applicants are welcome to re-apply in 6 months. We encourage you to keep your online application up-to-date...
We appreciate the time you took to meet with us... We wish you much sucess in your future endeavors and career.
Seems to say both.
- Fri Jan 13, 2012 10:00 pm
- Forum: Air Canada
- Topic: PFO letter: The Actual wording (good vs bad)
- Replies: 19
- Views: 7570
PFO letter: The Actual wording (good vs bad)
Would somebody be able to give me an actual wording for the whole good vs bad PFO letter from AC? I've seen so many statements that are contradictory and one guy made a this or that statement when I have seen both of the phrases.
- Wed Dec 07, 2011 2:49 pm
- Forum: General Comments
- Topic: PAL members
- Replies: 37
- Views: 7218
Re: PAL members
Need access!! Please!
- Sat Nov 05, 2011 7:12 pm
- Forum: Flight Training
- Topic: Use of strobe lights
- Replies: 29
- Views: 3917
Re: Use of strobe lights
Just to add. Any time you are on a runway, and that means anytime you're crossing one on your way to the runway you intend to take off of.
- Tue Nov 01, 2011 7:10 am
- Forum: General Comments
- Topic: PAL members
- Replies: 37
- Views: 7218
Re: PAL members
Hmmm interesting...