Must be that high density Asian seating version..!Bacunayagua wrote:Considering it has an MTOW of well over 28 thousand pounds and a seat capacity of 38. I'd say it's definitely a transport category aircraft.
Search found 4 matches
- Sat Mar 18, 2017 7:22 pm
- Forum: Accidents, Incidents & Overdue Aircraft
- Topic: Cargo North (North Star Air) Crashes DC3 in PickleLake
- Replies: 141
- Views: 39797
Re: Cargo North (North Star Air) Crashes DC3 in PickleLake
- Sun Jun 07, 2015 12:15 pm
- Forum: General Comments
- Topic: New IFR validity rules.
- Replies: 16
- Views: 4350
Re: New IFR validity rules.
your quoted CAR,s is somewhat vague. It implies you need to write after 24 months.
I too am hearing no more rewrites if you have sucessfully passed it before
I read the quoted CARS,s to say that as well. There is no place that it mentions 48 months.
So where did the 48 months come from?
I too am hearing no more rewrites if you have sucessfully passed it before
I read the quoted CARS,s to say that as well. There is no place that it mentions 48 months.
So where did the 48 months come from?
- Sun Jun 07, 2015 12:10 pm
- Forum: General Comments
- Topic: New IFR validity rules.
- Replies: 16
- Views: 4350
Re: New IFR validity rules.
In the associated material that was sent to Pilot Examiners it definitely states that the INRAT is no longer reequired regardless of the length of inactivity. As far as not being stated in the advisory circular, that actually means it's not required since it is isn't stated as a requirement. The ad...
- Fri May 22, 2015 11:04 pm
- Forum: Accidents, Incidents & Overdue Aircraft
- Topic: Plane fighting fires near Cold Lake crashes
- Replies: 23
- Views: 11675
Re: Plane fighting fires near Cold Lake crashes
Did you read the story in your link. It answers your question.