Ok got it. But is there any reference in the MOS to the grievance that ACPA had supposedly filed over the % of hours that CPA carriers were doing reference to mainline?

As previously stated, there is no let on scope

Just as I thought

Teacher,
Perhaps you can help me: Which part of ACPA’s scope clause on the CPA carriers is being compromised with this MOA?

Which part of ACPA’s scope clause on the CPA carriers is being compromised with this MOA?

“The language in both MOA’s are identical and it does not provide the company any relief with the respect to the CPA flying”

Ok so what is the scope let that RippleRock is talking about?

For the uninformed... the scope “let” you are referring to is what exactly?

I guess you guys don’t know the history of trying to get AIF waived for airline employees. NACC was approached pre pandemic to support a union/ airline employee initiative to get AIFs waived for airline employees(commuting/pass travel everywhere else in the world is basically free for airline employ...

Tell NACC that airline employees will throw their names and support behind the initiative if they agree to waive the airport improvement fees for airline employees going forward. It is outrageous that pilots and FAs currently pay the AIF and we all know that when travel does come back the AIF will b...

I know Jazz was no where near the max ratio before COVID and I know we have deferred delivery of some 900s until next year so I don’t think a grievance would have any merit

Planebored what the hell are you talking about? Jazz and/or Sky Regional are allowed under the ACPA scope to operate jets up to a maximum of 76 seats per frame. The CRJ900 and EMB175 operates at 76 seats so what the hell grievance are you talking about?

Who is JV?

Loon-a-tic, You clearly had your mind made up on this topic so I’m not sure why you even asked the question. As for the Thomas Cook debacle, you will never see that happen again since AC/Jazz signed a deal until 2035 so you can be sure as hell AC put language in the CPA to prevent that. Also in said...

The irony of this industry is that for the past 3 years(right up until Covid hit) all the attributes of hard work, pay your dues etc were thrown out the window. Seneca brats With rich parents and other entitled metrosexuals with 200 hrs got hired at Jazz etc and as soon as the ink was dry on their A...

Yhz-Yyt has been hammered since the opened the “Atlantic bubble” a week or so ago

Hi guys, curious what a 20 year plus 787 pilot is making now and if any had to drop down to a smaller airplane? I’m assuming the pilots are sharing the time so there are minimum layoffs . Thanks again Jazz pilots are on a trajectory to earn more than AC pilots over the next 5 years. Likewise I am a...

Let say one is talking about a dog’s bone. The ‘s indicates possession/ownership. If one replaces the word dog with “ it” , and one says “ it’s bone” , that is contrary to the rule that “it’s” is a contraction of the word “it” and “is” Also I purposely used “one” instead of “you” in the explanation ...

Unfortunately I think those salaries south of the border of which we have been so envious in the past couple of years may be in for a haircut. We might need to just try to hold on to what we have in Canada.

Its a change in name only. It's. When used as a contraction, as in, when short for "it is", or "it was", an apostrophe is needed. What a bizarre language English is. An apostrophe can be used to indicate possession or contraction and there is no rhyme or reason as to when or when not use it. Just h...

.