Choppermech1986 wrote:I hope you're aware of the gift you have Henri! Wonderful read.

+1

Beautiful! Makes all the wasted hours of trolling AvCanada worth while!

CARS 605.33 (2) Subject to section 605.34, no person shall conduct a take-off in a multi-engined turbine-powered aircraft that is configured for six or more passenger seats and for which two pilots are required by the aircraft type certificate or by the subpart under which the aircraft is operated, ...

You and I know that no company could use and abuse their workers like those who use rampies do. No 'normal' person would work his ass off and kiss other's asses and put in the long hours that rampies do for what they pay pilot wannabes. Only someone who wants to fly would put up with that crap. You...

Now, there's the crux of the whole problem. "poor attitude, and work ethic...." are subjective. That, simply translated, means somebody doesn't like you . Pure and simple. You want a pilot? Hire a pilot. You want a ramp person? Hire a ramp person. The very fact that this particular company never us...

Why are there so many clowns on AvCanada that feel the need to bash good companies for no reason?????

Looproll????

Does anyone know anything about these guys? Chief Pilot? What theyre flying? Any info would be greatly appreciated. PM me if you like. Thanks.

280TT! Sounds like youre about ready for that Captains ride on the 1900 alright!

Ahhhh the never ending battle of the training bond! All that we (pilots) ever hear about training bonds is that employers "don't like training bonds" and that they wouldn't have them if pilots hadn't brought them upon themselves. Why is it always the pilots that are to blame? If operators didn't hir...