A very capable aviator and a true gentleman died that day. Why don’t you find another thread to score cheap internet points......
Cold Lake Airshow - 2016
Moderators: sky's the limit, sepia, Sulako, lilfssister, North Shore
-
- Top Poster
- Posts: 5869
- Joined: Wed Feb 18, 2004 7:17 pm
- Location: West Coast
Re: Cold Lake Airshow - 2016
- rookiepilot
- Rank 11
- Posts: 4413
- Joined: Sat Apr 01, 2017 3:50 pm
Re: Cold Lake Airshow - 2016
You misunderstood, clearly, my sarcasm, and are directing your comment to the wrong person.Big Pistons Forever wrote: ↑Sun Jan 07, 2018 5:25 pmA very capable aviator and a true gentleman died that day. Why don’t you find another thread to score cheap internet points......
Perhaps my sarcasm was poorly communicated, and I therefore retract it.
BUT ---
These comments on downwinds and tailwinds were borderline amusing, but no longer for me and certainly not on fatal accidents. Enough already, and I just called these kind of comments out recently regarding another accident. They are also distracting from the real causes.
BPH if you read my comments I actually get really upset when people die, whether it be this gentlemen, student pilots or that horrible incident with the missing plane in the mountains.
This ought to be very clear, I trust.
NO --- I do not find fatal accidents amusing.
- rookiepilot
- Rank 11
- Posts: 4413
- Joined: Sat Apr 01, 2017 3:50 pm
Re: Cold Lake Airshow - 2016
I'm still waiting to hear exactly why a 9 knot downwind is relevant to this accident.
Please precisely and factually explain.
------------------
Please precisely and factually explain.
------------------
- rookiepilot
- Rank 11
- Posts: 4413
- Joined: Sat Apr 01, 2017 3:50 pm
Re: Cold Lake Airshow - 2016
BIG PISTONS.
I hope you are reading this thread:
http://www.avcanada.ca/forums2/viewtopi ... 8&t=121687
As I have said prior you have addressed your critique to the wrong person.
Get it straight next time and address the one clearly trolling.
I hope you are reading this thread:
http://www.avcanada.ca/forums2/viewtopi ... 8&t=121687
As I have said prior you have addressed your critique to the wrong person.
Get it straight next time and address the one clearly trolling.