

Moderators: sky's the limit, sepia, Sulako, lilfssister, North Shore
Why is that?daedalusx wrote:Anyone who's instructed at CYHU or worked ATC there knows it was only a question of time ...
Busy airport and especially since they closed Mascouche CSK3 airport. And add Chinese students with less than functionnal english.MrWings wrote:Why is that?daedalusx wrote:Anyone who's instructed at CYHU or worked ATC there knows it was only a question of time ...
Easy to judge. We have 0 details. As a controller myself I can say the situation is never as clear cut as the tape sounds. I know the person involved and don't believe it responsible to judge at this point in time.CpnCrunch wrote:I can imagine that happening at an FSS, but Towers are normally a little more assertive. I would have expected something along the lines of: "GOI, turn right immediately heading 330 due to conflicting traffic" pretty quickly.URC wrote:From the LiveATC archive.
00:46 (min:sec) on the archive, C-GPNP, also a C-152, checks on and is cleared to join a left downwind runway 24L not below 1,600 feet.
04:54, C-FGOI cleared for takeoff runway 24L left turn eastbound not above 1,100 feet.
07:27, Tower calling PNP, "Papa November Papa make sure you maintain 1,600 feet traffic ten o'clock one mile ah Cessna eastbound 1,100 feet". No response.
07:39, Tower repeats call to PNP to maintain 1,600 feet, transmission partially blocked by other aircraft. No response.
07:55, unknown transmission ? Instructor ?
07:56, Tower, "Papa November Papa are you listening ?" No response.
08:08, Tower calls PNP again and asks "are you listening ?" No response.
08:48, Different Tower controller takes over.
This.Gilles Hudicourt wrote:The same way we don't pass judgement on pilot actions before having all the facts (if at all), respectfully, you don't have all the facts to make such a statement on the tower controller......CpnCrunch wrote: I can imagine that happening at an FSS, but Towers are normally a little more assertive. I would have expected something along the lines of: "GOI, turn right immediately heading 330 due to conflicting traffic" pretty quickly.
Yes, you're absolutely right. Deleted. I'd suggest you and Braun do the same.Gilles Hudicourt wrote:The same way we don't pass judgement on pilot actions before having all the facts (if at all), respectfully, you don't have all the facts to make such a statement on the tower controller......CpnCrunch wrote: I can imagine that happening at an FSS, but Towers are normally a little more assertive. I would have expected something along the lines of: "GOI, turn right immediately heading 330 due to conflicting traffic" pretty quickly.
the puppy mill model does run a higher risk but flight training has become a cut throat industryOld Dog Flying wrote:It is only a matter of time before it happens again out here in the Fraser Valley with all the off shore flying schools operating in our airspace and clowns not understanding anything more than "cleared to land "or "cleared for take-off". And now with the instructors at these schools teaching in their own language, there is even less Engrish being spoken.
But $100.00 gets them an Engrish proficiency pass...BULL..
"It is only a matter of time" is the scariest phrase in aviation. TC better heed these warnings.Old Dog Flying wrote:It is only a matter of time before it happens again out here in the Fraser Valley
Instead of whining about the TSB on every post, why don't you direct your frustrations to your local mp and minister space cadet.RatherBeFlying wrote:In two years or so, TSB will issue the report with the mode C radar tracks. We will then know who did or did not comply with ATC instructions.
Had the accident happened forty miles south, the NTSB would be releasing radar tracks in a few weeks.
Qu'on garde les champignons dans l'ombre...