Twin otter on the ice
Moderators: sky's the limit, sepia, Sulako, lilfssister, North Shore
Twin otter on the ice
Shepherds prayer" dear lord, please don't let me f$&@ up"
https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/north/ai ... -1.5065111
https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/north/ai ... -1.5065111
Re: Twin otter on the ice
Basically hit a pothole and bent a tie rod end. White snow on white ice, maybe a bright sunny day.... Definitely a "wait .... What happened?" Moment.
Seriously though from the report by the passengers it was a fairly gentle impact. I can see it doing some damage, but would figure you could swap out the damaged pieces in that case instead of trying to chopper the airframe out. Wonder what they actually broke?
Seriously though from the report by the passengers it was a fairly gentle impact. I can see it doing some damage, but would figure you could swap out the damaged pieces in that case instead of trying to chopper the airframe out. Wonder what they actually broke?
Re: Twin otter on the ice
It would beinteresting to know if it was sunny or flat light. That can make a big difference in whether you will see a drift(which is what the news story said they hit). Then there is the multitude of other factors that can lead to difficulties in ski operations.
Re: Twin otter on the ice
Absolutely. I was basically saying I can easily see how in the right (or rather wrong) conditions a drift could only be visible as you hit it basically. Just surprised it did enough damage that it was unflyable. Not like twin otters are known for being delicate.
Re: Twin otter on the ice
As said, "station 60". The structure at fuselage station 60, which is where the nosewheel strut is attached is not quite as rugged at the rest of the plane. Indeed, the strut is more robust than it's attachment, so you can break the nosewheel attachment, before you break the nosewheel. 'Same thing for C 172/C 182. Station 60 damage on Twin Otters is sadly common, and a lot of work to repair. It has been done on site, but a lot of things have to go right. Experienced Twin Otter operators (maintainers) know whether to attempt a local repair and ferry out or not.Not like twin otters are known for being delicate.
Re: Twin otter on the ice
Ah yes. Islander nosewheel was attached to a rather weak bulkhead. Strut was fine but bulkhead was bent untill the nosewheel was "retracted" on a fixed gear aircraft.
- Attachments
-
- FB_IMG_1553258272077.jpg (34.68 KiB) Viewed 4902 times
-
- Rank 8
- Posts: 840
- Joined: Mon Jan 31, 2005 4:12 pm
Re: Twin otter on the ice
I don't know any experienced Twin Otter operators that have abandoned our hired a heavy lift helicopter because of a station 60. Usually within 2 weeks its patched up enough to ferry it out.
I hate to say it but this is typical Military not having the experience to operate these aircraft.Not saying they shouldn't just saying flying circuits and strip to strip does not give you the experience for flat light on the snow .Let alone somewhere like the ocean our barren lands were hard drifts can be 3 feet high an dit will look flat.
I hate to say it but this is typical Military not having the experience to operate these aircraft.Not saying they shouldn't just saying flying circuits and strip to strip does not give you the experience for flat light on the snow .Let alone somewhere like the ocean our barren lands were hard drifts can be 3 feet high an dit will look flat.
Re: Twin otter on the ice
I think they know what they're doing with the twotters, they've had them for decades and were out working and training. They banged a machine up and can waste the money on a heavy lift to get it out whereas a private operator would just fix it as quickly and cheaply as possible. I don't agree with some of the military sops but our people are out year round and across the country.godsrcrazy wrote: ↑Fri Mar 22, 2019 10:37 am I don't know any experienced Twin Otter operators that have abandoned our hired a heavy lift helicopter because of a station 60. Usually within 2 weeks its patched up enough to ferry it out.
I hate to say it but this is typical Military not having the experience to operate these aircraft.Not saying they shouldn't just saying flying circuits and strip to strip does not give you the experience for flat light on the snow .Let alone somewhere like the ocean our barren lands were hard drifts can be 3 feet high an dit will look flat.
However, just like in the private sector, there are still a handful of "less skilled" pilots.
- Redneck_pilot86
- Rank (9)
- Posts: 1328
- Joined: Tue Feb 15, 2005 12:47 pm
- Location: between 60 and 70
Re: Twin otter on the ice
Having watched this twin otter struggle to depart from 3000', I expect a lot of their issues are from procedures getting in the way of operating the aircraft. Heck, it takes them 3 guys and 20 minutes just to get it running.
The only three things a wingman should ever say: 1. "Two's up" 2. "You're on fire" 3. "I'll take the fat one"
-
- Rank 8
- Posts: 898
- Joined: Fri Mar 05, 2010 10:16 pm
- Location: A sigma left of the top of the bell curve
Re: Twin otter on the ice
In your first paragraph you admit that "experienced" operators have accidents that result in station 60s frequently, but in your second paragraph you criticize the military for being so inexperienced that they had a station 60...godsrcrazy wrote: ↑Fri Mar 22, 2019 10:37 am I don't know any experienced Twin Otter operators that have abandoned our hired a heavy lift helicopter because of a station 60. Usually within 2 weeks its patched up enough to ferry it out.
I hate to say it but this is typical Military not having the experience to operate these aircraft.Not saying they shouldn't just saying flying circuits and strip to strip does not give you the experience for flat light on the snow .Let alone somewhere like the ocean our barren lands were hard drifts can be 3 feet high an dit will look flat.
-
- Rank (9)
- Posts: 1764
- Joined: Sat Feb 21, 2004 3:59 pm
Re: Twin otter on the ice
Yeah, a lot of these comments don't sound like they come from a knowledgeable place. Sunny days aren't the tough ones when ski flying, station 60s on twins aren't shocking, of all the things a twin otter can do ski flying is the one the military does know a thing or two about, and (assuming a 12500 mtow) 3000' should never be a struggle for a twin unless overloaded on floats, regardless of procedures.
Re: Twin otter on the ice
Sounds like a Station 60 to me. The one significant weakness to an otherwise extremely robust bush plane.
Not sure if it was a factor in this case but as others have mentioned, landing on unproven snow or ice in flat light is not without considerable risk. Overcast conditions make recognizing the size and contours of snow drifts incredibly difficult. One mitigating factor would be to conduct a ski drag (dragging the heals of the skis over the surface) to assess the solidity of the terrain, usually followed with a second pass to inspect ones tracks. Sometimes though the contrast is so poor even a ski drag is a risk in itself.
Another factor at play here would be the use of wheel skis. The utility of wheel skis is at the expense of durability. When flying wheel skis it is important to keep in mind that they do not enjoy the flex of the leaf springs on board skis. Wheel skis are more rigid and much heavier than boards. The increased weight coupled with the broader surface area imparts much more force on the poor nose strut. Drifts that board skis would normally cut through or absorb can be quite jarring on wheel skis.
So baby that nose gear, especially on wheel skis. That means proving the ground you're about to touch down on. And on landing keep the nose off the ground until the last.. possible.. moment. Once on the ground it's also a good idea to taxi the full length of your planned take off run. Station 60's also occur on takeoff when pilots (often with a heavy load) run beyond their landing roll into unproven ground.
Sometimes despite all your efforts you break something. Its part of flying in the North.
However, returning to the incident at hand I find it interesting that the CF had to employ a heavy lift heli to recover their aircraft. There just so happens to be a well known DHC6 operator in Inuvik with a brand new hangar and a full complement of engineers with plenty of experience in just this sort of thing. But that's the bureaucracy of the CF for you. I respect our members in uniform but their methods of operating in the Arctic is always slow and cumbersome.
Not sure if it was a factor in this case but as others have mentioned, landing on unproven snow or ice in flat light is not without considerable risk. Overcast conditions make recognizing the size and contours of snow drifts incredibly difficult. One mitigating factor would be to conduct a ski drag (dragging the heals of the skis over the surface) to assess the solidity of the terrain, usually followed with a second pass to inspect ones tracks. Sometimes though the contrast is so poor even a ski drag is a risk in itself.
Another factor at play here would be the use of wheel skis. The utility of wheel skis is at the expense of durability. When flying wheel skis it is important to keep in mind that they do not enjoy the flex of the leaf springs on board skis. Wheel skis are more rigid and much heavier than boards. The increased weight coupled with the broader surface area imparts much more force on the poor nose strut. Drifts that board skis would normally cut through or absorb can be quite jarring on wheel skis.
So baby that nose gear, especially on wheel skis. That means proving the ground you're about to touch down on. And on landing keep the nose off the ground until the last.. possible.. moment. Once on the ground it's also a good idea to taxi the full length of your planned take off run. Station 60's also occur on takeoff when pilots (often with a heavy load) run beyond their landing roll into unproven ground.
Sometimes despite all your efforts you break something. Its part of flying in the North.
However, returning to the incident at hand I find it interesting that the CF had to employ a heavy lift heli to recover their aircraft. There just so happens to be a well known DHC6 operator in Inuvik with a brand new hangar and a full complement of engineers with plenty of experience in just this sort of thing. But that's the bureaucracy of the CF for you. I respect our members in uniform but their methods of operating in the Arctic is always slow and cumbersome.
Re: Twin otter on the ice
Not to be unkind but the "Vampires" are not the creme de la creme of Canadian military aviation. Once upon a time they had a hard core group of t otter drivers but that has changed, main reason they stopped floats. They are low time and low experienced guys with little to none training for off strip or rugged conditions. Station 60 can and has happened to the best but the percentage of this happening is directly related to experience and training for those conditions.
I bumped into a young military t otter pilot in Eureka once who had never flown skies and was up there to do work on the sea ice. I told him the best thing he could do is track down the Bradley otter captain and get some pointers. He was just plain shit scared. I always wondered how the military could put a pilot in that situation.
I bumped into a young military t otter pilot in Eureka once who had never flown skies and was up there to do work on the sea ice. I told him the best thing he could do is track down the Bradley otter captain and get some pointers. He was just plain shit scared. I always wondered how the military could put a pilot in that situation.
Black air has no lift - extra fuel has no weight
http://www.blackair.ca
http://www.blackair.ca
-
- Rank 8
- Posts: 840
- Joined: Mon Jan 31, 2005 4:12 pm
Re: Twin otter on the ice
I will clarify my statement on experience. I am not just talking about pilots. I am mainly talking about the military experience to repair. As i said earlier this is a repair commercial operators would do in the field. They would not abandon the aircraft our hire a heavy lift aircraft. This is difference between having to make money our having the tax pay.Diadem wrote: ↑Fri Mar 22, 2019 9:51 pmIn your first paragraph you admit that "experienced" operators have accidents that result in station 60s frequently, but in your second paragraph you criticize the military for being so inexperienced that they had a station 60...godsrcrazy wrote: ↑Fri Mar 22, 2019 10:37 am I don't know any experienced Twin Otter operators that have abandoned our hired a heavy lift helicopter because of a station 60. Usually within 2 weeks its patched up enough to ferry it out.
I hate to say it but this is typical Military not having the experience to operate these aircraft.Not saying they shouldn't just saying flying circuits and strip to strip does not give you the experience for flat light on the snow .Let alone somewhere like the ocean our barren lands were hard drifts can be 3 feet high an dit will look flat.
As for pilot experience. It use to be a bit of a laugh watching the military twin otter on floats dock. They had their own dock on East Bay in Yellowknife. On any given docking there would be 2 people with head sets on the floats. They would start docking. A Ptarmigan Twin otter would land. Park between 2 of their company planes be tied up and off loading before these guys shut down.
Re: Twin otter on the ice
I've watched the Vampire float machine land on the East Bay, then Len land, tie up, borrow my truck, run over to Weaver's for some smokes, come back and pour a coffee before the 440 machine finally shut down. They must have had some pretty impressive oil temps some days... But it's not their fault, they just never had anyone to teach them, they never got to fly as much as the rest of us, and they were/are handicapped by things like having to wear a bone dome that you couldn't get through the pilot's window to see what was going on outside. While the rest of us were doing a thousand hours a year I doubt any of them got a hundred. They Station 60'd a Twin on sea ice? Does that really surprise anyone? Sh-t happens.godsrcrazy wrote: ↑Sat Mar 23, 2019 7:20 amI will clarify my statement on experience. I am not just talking about pilots. I am mainly talking about the military experience to repair. As i said earlier this is a repair commercial operators would do in the field. They would not abandon the aircraft our hire a heavy lift aircraft. This is difference between having to make money our having the tax pay.Diadem wrote: ↑Fri Mar 22, 2019 9:51 pmIn your first paragraph you admit that "experienced" operators have accidents that result in station 60s frequently, but in your second paragraph you criticize the military for being so inexperienced that they had a station 60...godsrcrazy wrote: ↑Fri Mar 22, 2019 10:37 am I don't know any experienced Twin Otter operators that have abandoned our hired a heavy lift helicopter because of a station 60. Usually within 2 weeks its patched up enough to ferry it out.
I hate to say it but this is typical Military not having the experience to operate these aircraft.Not saying they shouldn't just saying flying circuits and strip to strip does not give you the experience for flat light on the snow .Let alone somewhere like the ocean our barren lands were hard drifts can be 3 feet high an dit will look flat.
As for pilot experience. It use to be a bit of a laugh watching the military twin otter on floats dock. They had their own dock on East Bay in Yellowknife. On any given docking there would be 2 people with head sets on the floats. They would start docking. A Ptarmigan Twin otter would land. Park between 2 of their company planes be tied up and off loading before these guys shut down.
Re: Twin otter on the ice
No matter where you are there is someone more experienced. We used to cringe at the float operators when they showed up in the spring but by the end of the summer they were always up to speed. The MNR guys never seem to make it since they spend most of the summer sitting on alert. It's just a matter of doing it everyday. There is no short cut for experience and recent experience and local experience.
-
- Rank 6
- Posts: 437
- Joined: Tue Mar 16, 2004 6:46 am
Re: Twin otter on the ice
As stated, in a Twin Otter that runs on skis this (Station 60) is bound to happen at some point. Lake ice is bad enough, sea ice must be even more fun.
The Twin Otter's nose gear competes with a C180/185 for a poor design (main gear box is a square pop can) for an airplane flying on skis. Flying skis in in flat light is about as much fun as trying to snowmobile quickly across a lake in flat light. But a least I have the option to go slow in an Arctic Cat (at least I've heard it goes slow)
The Twin Otter's nose gear competes with a C180/185 for a poor design (main gear box is a square pop can) for an airplane flying on skis. Flying skis in in flat light is about as much fun as trying to snowmobile quickly across a lake in flat light. But a least I have the option to go slow in an Arctic Cat (at least I've heard it goes slow)
-
- Rank 10
- Posts: 2565
- Joined: Wed Mar 16, 2005 11:07 pm
- Location: Negative sequencial vortex
Re: Twin otter on the ice
I always found it relaxing to be asked to fly onto sea ice in flat light- because I wouldn't do it. There are certain times you can land somewhere unfamiliar in flat light... south of the tree-line you can be reasonably certain the snow will be fluffy enough that landing on it when you can't quite see it isn't going to hurt too bad. North of the tree-line, on wheel-skis, landing in a p,ace you haven't been to before and marked out for yourself is an idiotic thing to do in flat light. Doubly so on sea ice. If that's your habit, I give you 50/50 odds of completing a ski season without a station 60. The nosewheel might be the Otter's achilles heel, but I never broke one, and I flew them a fair few years, in all environments.
If I'd known I was going to live this long, I'd have taken better care of myself
Re: Twin otter on the ice
I remember that back in the day, 402 Squadron put their Twin Otters on wheel skis in the winter and floats in the summer. It's always seemed strange to me why they no longer do this - it's wheels year 'round. Supposed to be a Search and Rescue aircraft after all, but hey - what do I know?godsrcrazy wrote: ↑Fri Mar 22, 2019 10:37 am I don't know any experienced Twin Otter operators that have abandoned our hired a heavy lift helicopter because of a station 60. Usually within 2 weeks its patched up enough to ferry it out.
I hate to say it but this is typical Military not having the experience to operate these aircraft.Not saying they shouldn't just saying flying circuits and strip to strip does not give you the experience for flat light on the snow .Let alone somewhere like the ocean our barren lands were hard drifts can be 3 feet high an dit will look flat.