Bearskin FO Pay
Posted: Sat Dec 17, 2016 12:08 am
Anyone know what's the pay like for First Officers at Bearskin? There was a post that mentioned $29,600 per year, just wondering if that's accurate.
Thanks!
Thanks!
http://www.avcanada.ca/forums2/
100% FO turnover from Jan 2015 to Jan 2016. That's over 20 'kids'. You know as well as I do, no one this day and age knows that "give you my word" actually means "give you my word". However I do agree, you don't need to put up 10K. But if you you have any decent time, upgrade will be in a year or less....Illya Kuryakin wrote:Things are moving kids. You don't need to put 10 large up front for jobs anymore. Don't.
Illya
If you don't have numbers, then please, do tell how we are screwing over the "young". Oh you've been here 6 months, well please take 15,000k from my salary. Here I'll give you some of my days off too. You know what, take my wife. You've earned it. Also how is it a miserable work environment for a couple years? Does it magically get better? Funny story, every pilot, 25 years in or 1 month in, works in the same environment under the same conditions. Why do you continuously post when you don't have a clue??goingnowherefast wrote:From the rumours I've heard, it's a pretty miserable working environment for the first couple years. Union contract is very top heavy and screws the "young". Management mentality is to not even try and retain new hires. Nobody is expecting them to stay, just a "when you leave, this is the financial contract".
Unfortunately I don't know any actual numbers to answer the original question.
You find out by talking to their pilots and asking "How's things at Bearskin?" If multiple pilots go on the same rant about top heavy union contracts and the high seniority guys getting all the perks, then it starts to build a picture.Maynard wrote:If you don't have numbers, then please, do tell how we are screwing over the "young".
Again, Seniority. Top 5 guys bid their 6 weeks vacation over the whole year, bid all the good schedules, etc. Leaves the September vacation slots to go on holidays with your school age kids. Overnighting on weekends when your wife is off work. 10 year captains get a fat paycheck, 1st year FOs are bonded to their poverty salary. Also, last I heard it was a 10k bond, not "15,000k".Maynard wrote:Oh you've been here 6 months, well please take 15,000k from my salary. Here I'll give you some of my days off too. You know what, take my wife. You've earned it. Also how is it a miserable work environment for a couple years? Does it magically get better? Funny story, every pilot, 25 years in or 1 month in, works in the same environment under the same conditions.
Actually that is my first post in this thread. I was actually expecting more helpful responses from others but with the lack thereof, I offered what little I know.Maynard wrote:Why do you continuously post when you don't have a clue??
It's gone beyond "I give you my word.." and you know t. It's the industry. Plain and simple. The days of enslvement in a Metro are coming to a much needed end. Trying to tie pilots to a bond when they can go fly a Q is just not going to work anymore. It's now (and it always has been) the cost of doing business.Maynard wrote:100% FO turnover from Jan 2015 to Jan 2016. That's over 20 'kids'. You know as well as I do, no one this day and age knows that "give you my word" actually means "give you my word". However I do agree, you don't need to put up 10K. But if you you have any decent time, upgrade will be in a year or less....Illya Kuryakin wrote:Things are moving kids. You don't need to put 10 large up front for jobs anymore. Don't.
Illya
I would work there if they didn't ask me for money AND if they paid properly. $29K a year is not a lot more than minimum wage.sstaurus wrote:It's true there are a lot of lifers there, which is why a lot of people don't stick around very long. But to say that's because the company sucks is just ignorant. It's still a great place for experience and has top notch maintenance. The contract has great work rules, but any seniority system favours the old timers.
I think they'd do themselves a favour by changing to a promissory note for training, but then they'd be chasing down pilot after pilot as they all take off after 3 months. That bond doesn't even cover the cost of training an initial. What can you do when every pilot is salivating over shiny airliners at the moment...
Ok, so flying a twin engine, pressurized aircraft all over the province in crap weather is not worth as much as being VFR in a circuit pattern. WTF.Ex99guy wrote: For the record, in this day and age a couple hundred hours on a metro won't advance your career that much. As much as it pains me to say this, if you're desperate to burn money spend the 10 G's on an instructor rating. At least you'll have something to show for it, like a fancy new sticker for your ADB.
Was there ever a "give you my word"? Bonds seem to be a mutual understanding that people likely won't be staying the duration with a specified financial agreement. Like buying out of a cell phone contract, if you will. If they actually wanted FO retention, the WAWCON would be better.Illya Kuryakin wrote:It's gone beyond "I give you my word.." and you know t. It's the industry. Plain and simple. The days of enslvement in a Metro are coming to a much needed end. Trying to tie pilots to a bond when they can go fly a Q is just not going to work anymore. It's now (and it always has been) the cost of doing business.Maynard wrote:100% FO turnover from Jan 2015 to Jan 2016. That's over 20 'kids'. You know as well as I do, no one this day and age knows that "give you my word" actually means "give you my word". However I do agree, you don't need to put up 10K. But if you you have any decent time, upgrade will be in a year or less....Illya Kuryakin wrote:Things are moving kids. You don't need to put 10 large up front for jobs anymore. Don't.
Illya
Illya
Really?? Like a Dash 8-100 is a career position?? Give me a break. A new FO at Jazz makes 37,000/yr, that's 8k more than JV. Compare expenses in YYZ vs YQT. Maybe you should keep your arrogant, ignorant ass in PQ. C'est l'hopital qui se moque de la charité.Jean-Pierre wrote:$29k/year and you have to give them $10k up front. Stay clear. It's an old boy club that turned a metro position that should probably never be a career position into one.
NO THEY WOULDN'T!! People just don't get it. You could offer every FO 15 days off and 80k starting salary. Guess what, they will still go back to Southern Ontario to fly a shiny Q400 because its a step to the 787 at AC. Its all about the end goal. Flying a 747 for 10,000$ a year will still beat flying a metro for 100,000$ a year. I asked it in the last thread, show me a 704 operator who has better WAWCON than Bearskin. Crickets. Please, show me, put me in my place.goingnowherefast wrote:Was there ever a "give you my word"? Bonds seem to be a mutual understanding that people likely won't be staying the duration with a specified financial agreement. Like buying out of a cell phone contract, if you will. If they actually wanted FO retention, the WAWCON would be better.Illya Kuryakin wrote:It's gone beyond "I give you my word.." and you know t. It's the industry. Plain and simple. The days of enslvement in a Metro are coming to a much needed end. Trying to tie pilots to a bond when they can go fly a Q is just not going to work anymore. It's now (and it always has been) the cost of doing business.Maynard wrote:
100% FO turnover from Jan 2015 to Jan 2016. That's over 20 'kids'. You know as well as I do, no one this day and age knows that "give you my word" actually means "give you my word". However I do agree, you don't need to put up 10K. But if you you have any decent time, upgrade will be in a year or less....
Illya