PC12 logbook time
Moderators: sky's the limit, sepia, Sulako, North Shore
PC12 logbook time
Hi everyone, simply to have a few different .
Last edited by Flyca30 on Fri Jan 18, 2019 6:00 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Re: PC12 logbook time
Depends. Is the bond up front? 2 years is a long time, a PPC is only good for 1 (and you're probably only getting a PCC) will your upgrade to captain be within those two years? (and does that come with a second bond?) What kind of hours are you expecting to fly? (a small corporate/ charter at 2-400 a year or a busy charter etc. At 800+?). Is the pay decent?
Pc-12 time seems to be as good as multi these days for the regionals though
Pc-12 time seems to be as good as multi these days for the regionals though
Re: PC12 logbook time
No it isn’t upfront, the amount is prorated from the initial training/
Last edited by Flyca30 on Fri Jan 18, 2019 6:01 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Re: PC12 logbook time
Then that actually sounds like a sweet gig. I'd wager that your pc-12 (likely newer model full efis/ glass?) Time probably looked better upon than my equivalent Navajo time (steam, unpressurized, piston) your planes operation is closer to an "airliner" than mine. Especially with 1 year to captain you'll have your ATPL signed off in 2 and be a great candidate to go straight to at least jazz/ porter if not even Sunwing/ Transat/ AC
Re: PC12 logbook time
I never felt comfortable over the rocks, or water in a navajo. I felt less so in the -12"pax only"
-
- Top Poster
- Posts: 8132
- Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2008 12:25 pm
- Location: Winterfell...
Re: PC12 logbook time
A twin engine aircraft gives you twice the chances of having an engine failure.
For a 40 year old clapped out Ho vs a modern PT6 powered aircraft with an extra FCU it’s more like four or five to one.
A Navajo on one engine is probably about as likely to keep you above mountains or make landfall as a PC-12 is on none.
But multi PIC is king. My day VFR Cessna 337 time counted for a lot more than another pilot’s PC-12 time per the customer contract requirements. Go figure.
For a 40 year old clapped out Ho vs a modern PT6 powered aircraft with an extra FCU it’s more like four or five to one.
A Navajo on one engine is probably about as likely to keep you above mountains or make landfall as a PC-12 is on none.
But multi PIC is king. My day VFR Cessna 337 time counted for a lot more than another pilot’s PC-12 time per the customer contract requirements. Go figure.
Geez did I say that....? Or just think it....?
-
- Rank (9)
- Posts: 1764
- Joined: Sat Feb 21, 2004 3:59 pm
Re: PC12 logbook time
And if an engine failure does happen, what's the probability of maintaining altitude in a twin versus single?iflyforpie wrote: ↑Mon Feb 04, 2019 8:08 pm A twin engine aircraft gives you twice the chances of having an engine failure.