Multi Engine-Piston PIC

Got a hot employment or interview tip to help a fellow aviator find a job or looking for a little job advice place your posting here.

Moderators: sky's the limit, sepia, Sulako, North Shore

MikeLima
Rank 1
Rank 1
Posts: 16
Joined: Wed Apr 04, 2012 4:57 pm

Multi Engine-Piston PIC

Post by MikeLima »

Hi guys,

After a pause from flying I am looking forward to follow my passion.

I have 1500 TT with 1000 Multi-Turbine experience (King Air) in northern operations, multi-crew environment (mostly medevac and charters, gravel runways up north).
I’ve got a couple of offers for right seat turbine but what I want (and need) is PIC time.

I am currently living in Eastern Canada but willing to move if necessary.
I am going to start knocking some doors for a Twin piston PIC job.

Any tips, ideas or thoughts are more than welcomed; feel free to pm if necessary.
Thanks a lot in advance for your time and fly safe.
Regards

MikeLima
---------- ADS -----------
 
esp803

Re: Multi Engine-Piston PIC

Post by esp803 »

Chase lifestyle, not metal.

Don't worry about the type of machine you are flying, pick the job that gives you the schedule, pay and location you want.

E
---------- ADS -----------
 
toelessjoe
Rank 5
Rank 5
Posts: 329
Joined: Fri Mar 13, 2009 12:54 pm

Re: Multi Engine-Piston PIC

Post by toelessjoe »

Pm me my friend.

- Toeless.
---------- ADS -----------
 
MikeLima
Rank 1
Rank 1
Posts: 16
Joined: Wed Apr 04, 2012 4:57 pm

Re: Multi Engine-Piston PIC

Post by MikeLima »

toelessjoe wrote:Pm me my friend.

- Toeless.
Toelessjoe

I did send you an email as requested however I haven’t heard from you yet.
Anyone else wants to contribute with some tips/ideas?

MikeLima
---------- ADS -----------
 
YYC the place to be
Rank 3
Rank 3
Posts: 172
Joined: Wed Apr 06, 2005 8:43 am
Location: Calgary Alberta Canada

Re: Multi Engine-Piston PIC

Post by YYC the place to be »

It is hard for an employer to hire you as a direct entry captain when you haven't been a captain before. I highly recommend you take a co pilot job, be patient and prove yourself to your employer. If your work ethic and skill are to that company’s standard then you make your move to an entry level Captain spot.

Good Luck
---------- ADS -----------
 
User avatar
rooster
Rank 4
Rank 4
Posts: 252
Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2010 3:02 am
Location: The flatlands

Re: Multi Engine-Piston PIC

Post by rooster »

YYC the place to be wrote:It is hard for an employer to hire you as a direct entry captain when you haven't been a captain before. I highly recommend you take a co pilot job, be patient and prove yourself to your employer. If your work ethic and skill are to that company’s standard then you make your move to an entry level Captain spot.

Good Luck

Bang on brutha!!

ML what makes you so righteous that you feel you are entitled to a left seat job on a multi with 1500TT? That's not a lot of time or experience. You SHOULD be taking a right seat job, until your comfortable with a companies operations, airplanes, routes, and until THEY are comfortable with YOU in the left seat. Companies aren't going to give you a direct entry left seat multi job without you having any prior operational command experience (1500 is SFA for DEC) and ESPECIALLY after 'pausing' from flying. There are pilots with as much as DOUBLE your time who are finally earning their 4th stripe. I doubt you're in the same echelon. Sorry champ, but you're still green. Go EARN that extra stripe with experience, not entitlement.
---------- ADS -----------
 
iflyforpie
Top Poster
Top Poster
Posts: 8132
Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2008 12:25 pm
Location: Winterfell...

Re: Multi Engine-Piston PIC

Post by iflyforpie »

Really? You need to be a copilot before you can fly a multi engined piston aircraft? I was flying one commercially at 300TT and don't have a single hour of cojo time in my logbook.

Flying a simple twin like a 337 or Islander VFR should be well within the skill level of a 200 hour wonder and a Navajo or a 402 IFR should be good for someone who's has some time under their belt and the required hours for SPIFR.

Lots of realistic opportunities for such in Canada? No. But nothing ventured nothing gained.
---------- ADS -----------
 
Slats
Rank 6
Rank 6
Posts: 478
Joined: Sun Feb 04, 2007 7:35 pm

Re: Multi Engine-Piston PIC

Post by Slats »

+1 to most of what pie said.

1500TT may not be much in the grand scheme of things, but it is more than enough to get you a Navajo captain job. Furthermore, I think you are smart to seek out PIC time. It is one of the keys to successful career progress in a non seniority environment. I know many piston and turbine twin captains who have a total of zero right seat time.

The only caveat that I would add to the previous post is that while Islanders are wonderful, simple, easy to fly aircraft, most of the ones that I am aware of in Canada do some pretty gnarly work that is in fact probably beyond the level of a 200 hour pilot or even a 1500 hour pilot with little PIC time and no bush experience.

I'm quite sure you could easily find a Navajo job. Best of luck.
---------- ADS -----------
 
Northern Flyer
Rank 6
Rank 6
Posts: 437
Joined: Sun Feb 15, 2004 8:40 pm

Re: Multi Engine-Piston PIC

Post by Northern Flyer »

esp803 wrote:Chase lifestyle, not metal.

Don't worry about the type of machine you are flying, pick the job that gives you the schedule, pay and location you want.

E

I don't really agree with this idea. Maybe later in your career but when you are starting out if you want PIC time go out and find it. When I was in a position where I hired people I would definatly consider some one with 1500 hrs and experiance in an IFR environment for a Navajo position as captain.
---------- ADS -----------
 
indieadventurer
Rank 5
Rank 5
Posts: 340
Joined: Fri Dec 05, 2008 7:59 am

Re: Multi Engine-Piston PIC

Post by indieadventurer »

rooster wrote:
YYC the place to be wrote:It is hard for an employer to hire you as a direct entry captain when you haven't been a captain before. I highly recommend you take a co pilot job, be patient and prove yourself to your employer. If your work ethic and skill are to that company’s standard then you make your move to an entry level Captain spot.

Good Luck

Bang on brutha!!

ML what makes you so righteous that you feel you are entitled to a left seat job on a multi with 1500TT? That's not a lot of time or experience. You SHOULD be taking a right seat job, until your comfortable with a companies operations, airplanes, routes, and until THEY are comfortable with YOU in the left seat. Companies aren't going to give you a direct entry left seat multi job without you having any prior operational command experience (1500 is SFA for DEC) and ESPECIALLY after 'pausing' from flying. There are pilots with as much as DOUBLE your time who are finally earning their 4th stripe. I doubt you're in the same echelon. Sorry champ, but you're still green. Go EARN that extra stripe with experience, not entitlement.
He's after a left seat in a light piston twin, not a King Air. 1500 TT with his background, yeah, he's got the experience for some jobs and a/c out there (C337, C310 PA31 etc...) and his post doesn't sound like he believes he's entitled to anything.
---------- ADS -----------
 
trey kule
Rank 11
Rank 11
Posts: 4763
Joined: Fri Aug 19, 2005 7:09 pm

Re: Multi Engine-Piston PIC

Post by trey kule »

To the OP...a bit different perspective.

1. It costs money to train a pilot for any type of twin work.and turn over is a problem...Companies are not there to help you out with your career wants and needs. Make certain you are willing to commit to a company for a period of time long enough to make the investment in your training. There is nothing wrong with career ambitions and plans, but it is the kiss of death in hiring if a company thinks you are just working for them for no other reason then you "need" some particular thing to move on to the next job..

2. This whole right seat mentality thing seems to be a modern concept where instead of gaining experience, one sort of jumps the cue to the right seat. Lots of pilots have found out the hard way that this is not a great career strategy.
Forget about mulit PIC time. Get any PIC time. Your right seat time may or may not be valuable depending on the company you got it with. Lots of young pilots will tell you how much they have learned and how valuable their right seat time was, but they sometimes dont really know the depth of it as they are simply doing self assessments.
The problem with direct entry into some of the twins is the direct entry Captains really cant fly, and have a terrible attitude as their logbooks show , as yours does, 1500 hours so they assume they are qualified....even if most of the 1500 hrs was spent simply following MacDonald style SOPs and having a Captain that would take over in an emergency.
I look at some of the SOPs for the smaller companies and the FOs are not allowed to land in strong winds, if the weather is below minimums plus 500 feet, or the Captain is to immediately take control in abnormal situations. They have been nothing more than assistants despite their claims to the contrary....then these same FO's think they should suddenly be able to slip into the left seat and do all that ..because...well, because it is a new company, and it you have 1500 hours of right seat time in a 1900D or a metro, well you surely can fly a simple Navajo... No clue that a navajo can actually turn into much more of a tigher than the 1900, and there will be no Captain to take over from them.
One of the questions that is asked in our interview with pilots with this background, is why they did not remain at their previous company and upgrade..The typical answer is because the previous company would not upgrade them without PIC time......so the interviewer may conclude that the pilot thinks that the new company has much lower standards for Captains, and much higher respect for the FO time than the previous company had..Give it some thought......or the pilot thinks that somehow right seat time is so valuable that the simple twins should be a shoo in to fly.

BTW.. As someone mentioned about the islander...Very easy to fly.. Very difficult to fly exceptionally well, and very expensive to maintain if flown by a pilot learning the ropes who does not respect it. And the type of work they do, as was also mentioned , is not what a typcial right seat FO will know much about.
---------- ADS -----------
 
iflyforpie
Top Poster
Top Poster
Posts: 8132
Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2008 12:25 pm
Location: Winterfell...

Re: Multi Engine-Piston PIC

Post by iflyforpie »

Slats wrote: The only caveat that I would add to the previous post is that while Islanders are wonderful, simple, easy to fly aircraft, most of the ones that I am aware of in Canada do some pretty gnarly work that is in fact probably beyond the level of a 200 hour pilot or even a 1500 hour pilot with little PIC time and no bush experience.
I was thinking more bag runs than bush stuff. 200 hour wonders wouldn't get on our 337 doing what we do with it either.
---------- ADS -----------
 
Northern Flyer
Rank 6
Rank 6
Posts: 437
Joined: Sun Feb 15, 2004 8:40 pm

Re: Multi Engine-Piston PIC

Post by Northern Flyer »

Just a question, who do you think is more qualified? A pilot with 1500 hours pic instructing in a 150, or a pilot with 1500 hours in the right seat of a light twin?

I personally would like someone with operational experiance. Some of you are making this flying out to be some super human feat. Imagine 300 hour military pilots landing fighters on an aircraft carrier, or flying complex aircraft over sea's. It's not rocket science, as long as said pilot has a good head on his or her shoulders and flys within their limits it will work out fine

To the original poster good luck with the job hunt, if your in the right place at the right time you will find what you are looking for. There are tonns of jobs available right now.
---------- ADS -----------
 
YYC the place to be
Rank 3
Rank 3
Posts: 172
Joined: Wed Apr 06, 2005 8:43 am
Location: Calgary Alberta Canada

Re: Multi Engine-Piston PIC

Post by YYC the place to be »

Let me clear something up from my last post.

1500 TT flying operationally is good time and an employer would have no problem moving someone to a Navajo captain seat with that kind of time. What I am trying to say is the employer doesn’t know you, they only have a snap shot from an interview and references you provided. That being said they would like to see someone prove themselves supervised by captains before they are put in command. If an employer has seen what you are doing and heard what you are doing from your captains for the last 1500 hrs then they have something to go on. Think of your FO job as an extension of your interview process.

Cheers.
---------- ADS -----------
 
MikeLima
Rank 1
Rank 1
Posts: 16
Joined: Wed Apr 04, 2012 4:57 pm

Re: Multi Engine-Piston PIC

Post by MikeLima »

Thanks for all the replies; my post is back to life!

No I don’t have any sense of entitlement, take in consideration that I am willing to leave a job with a salary that is at least twice the average Navajo captain salary, so I am willing to make personal and financial efforts to continue “chasing the dream”.

During my FO experience I was lucky enough to fly with great captains who didn’t see me as their assistant or their “flaps operator” as someone mentions here. They always looked at me as a “captain on training” the decisions weren’t made unilaterally; I was treated as a valuable crew member and yes they allowed me to land during rough conditions because according to them I was doing what I was supposed to do so it was no reason to take control. Those captains remain available to provide references if needed.

I am not trying to justify myself here, but in my almost 1000 hours of FO time I had the chance in numerous occasions to land in real black holes, to fly approaches to the minimums in short frozen runways in the middle of the night up north, to fuel a King Air at – 40c., etc
The above mentioned experience plus the advice of my mentors (captains I flew with) I believe will serves me well in a piston captain job. However, I am aware that I still have a LOT to learn. Good pilots are made of three good things: ATTITUDE, ATTITUDE and ATTITUDE, so remain humble and learn from those who are more experienced is the key.

Finally, someone mentioned here that I need PIC experience in order to get a PIC job, can someone explain me this? for me it doesn’t make any sense, how do you get PIC experience on the first place?

Why I am not flying right now?, it has a lots to do with family and personal reasons and the fact the company I used to fly does not longer exist.

Thanks for your comments, don’t forget the reason why I added this post, to get some tips with the goal to land a Multi-engine piston PIC job, it was not intended to create any debate.
Thanks to those who PM me, this post is not dead yet!
Best regards

MikeLima
---------- ADS -----------
 
+TSRAGR
Rank 1
Rank 1
Posts: 38
Joined: Wed Aug 18, 2010 6:34 pm

Re: Multi Engine-Piston PIC

Post by +TSRAGR »

Though always a valued crew member, the F.O. in a light twin is there to assist the Captain. The Captains job is to run the aircraft properly. It is an added bonus that you can learn from the Captain but training you is not part of their job. They are there to provide supervision.

Just sayin'.
---------- ADS -----------
 
Krimson
Rank 7
Rank 7
Posts: 585
Joined: Tue Apr 17, 2012 4:54 pm

Re: Multi Engine-Piston PIC

Post by Krimson »

+TSRAGR wrote:Though always a valued crew member, the F.O. in a light twin is there to assist the Captain. The Captains job is to run the aircraft properly. It is an added bonus that you can learn from the Captain but training you is not part of their job. They are there to provide supervision.

Just sayin'.
That would be a pretty bad captain in my books. The ones that make use of you are the ones that I want to fly with, who's to say who the better pilot. One has more experience, but the FO can usually still contribute. An FO position should be a learners permit to become captain, and the "sit down and shut up" captains should try and remember what it was like being an FO eager to learn and advance. (That's likely the problem though, they were treated the same, so instead remember how you wish to be treated and make the flight better for the whole crew.)
---------- ADS -----------
 
trey kule
Rank 11
Rank 11
Posts: 4763
Joined: Fri Aug 19, 2005 7:09 pm

Re: Multi Engine-Piston PIC

Post by trey kule »

Krimson, I sense you may be a little off on your understanding of why we have two crew in airplanes.

In the FTU, the two people are not crew members trying to work as one....there is an instructor and a student.
In a two crew plane there should be two functioning, qualified crew members. What you are suggesting is that not only should the Captain be the one crew member that is qualified, but they should further dilute their attention to instructing an FO. Do you really think that provides the best use of two crew members, both from an operational and a safety point of view?

Canada is very fortunate that there are enough qualified and experienced pilots, so that the FO's on the major carriers, for the most part, are qualified and experienced (there are some exceptions) The problem is at the smaller carriers and charter operators which, in many case actually operate in much more challanging envirorments, and with less experienced Captains. These operations need strong FO's ,not students in the right seat.

You have personalized, marginalized, and demonized Captains that dont subscribe to your idea that their job is to instruct when they should be operating as a fully functional crew. An FO is not a learner's permit in the sense that they need experience and instruction to do their job properly.

One of the critical components of two crews is the added level of safety introduced by the PNF monitoring and understanding the situation. Humans make errors. Captains are human. The second person should be providing the added level of safety. There are numerous examples where the Captain made an error, and due to the FO's inexpeience, the error was either not detected, or the seriousness of it not recognized resulting in some bad consequences.

And I have yet to see, in any company policy or SOPs the Captain's position described as a trainer. It is the exclusive realm of the new pilots to demand that without thinking about the flight operations , or really anything but their own career aspirations.
---------- ADS -----------
 
Last edited by trey kule on Mon Jun 18, 2012 7:39 pm, edited 1 time in total.
iflyforpie
Top Poster
Top Poster
Posts: 8132
Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2008 12:25 pm
Location: Winterfell...

Re: Multi Engine-Piston PIC

Post by iflyforpie »

+TSRAGR wrote:Though always a valued crew member, the F.O. in a light twin is there to assist the Captain. The Captains job is to run the aircraft properly. It is an added bonus that you can learn from the Captain but training you is not part of their job. They are there to provide supervision.

Just sayin'.
Yet one day, this F/O is going to upgrade to captain. They sure aren't going to be a safe or effective one without some passing of knowledge and experience...
---------- ADS -----------
 
trey kule
Rank 11
Rank 11
Posts: 4763
Joined: Fri Aug 19, 2005 7:09 pm

Re: Multi Engine-Piston PIC

Post by trey kule »

I think we are confusing some things here..An experienced pilot stepping into an FO position is obviously in need of some experience on type, and in the particular operations. And they learn that from experience.
That is much different than what I see some of the new pilots advocating. They want to become an FO without any command experience, or , in many case, very much experience at all (For example never acutally have flown in a cloud, used radar, or done a real approach close to minimums) They are looking to the Captains to literally teach them the basics. The situation is aggravated in complex heavy equiment because they are so automated, that the whole crew must be aware of degraded basic flight skills. A problem if you have had a few years to have them ingrained in you to start with.. A very serious problem if you have not had time and experience to have a decent foundation beforehand.

I used the radar example in particular..When the screen is pretty much all red and you are trying to figure out how to get through it is not the time to be explaining to your FO about recognition of hooks and fingers,...you are looking for resolutions to what could become a coffee spilling experience.

I realize I am wasting my time on the young and ambitious here who simply do not recognize what they dont understand, but hopefully cooler heads will in time prevail...The FAA has seen the light and made the necessary changes to force companies to fill the right seat with qualified and experienced people, and I expect TC will also move, though, if history is repeated it will take one or two rather spectacular and tragic accidents.

As to those who documented their experiences as Fo's one has only to ask if you think you are the general rule or the exception.
Just a question, who do you think is more qualified? A pilot with 1500 hours pic instructing in a 150, or a pilot with 1500 hours in the right seat of a light twin?
depends on whether one of them was from a visibile minority or female.... :smt040 (joking before anyone takes it seriously)
---------- ADS -----------
 
Last edited by trey kule on Mon Jun 18, 2012 7:36 pm, edited 2 times in total.
Post Reply

Return to “Employment Forum”