Where does it go John? When it comes to pass that the one list and flow can live on as it does today, will you challenge it, just to try and prove that your "efforts" here weren't wasted? (I think you would fail in any challenge though, anyway).China_CAAC_Exam wrote: ↑Sat Nov 17, 2018 8:18 amhurtin' albertan. I admit it could happen. That said, something happening in January is not indicative that the matter is closed. If ALPA has violated its own rules, well, if you've read even a few of my posts, you know where that issue goes.hurtin'albertan wrote: ↑Fri Nov 16, 2018 12:27 pmIt will be SO SWEET to see you proven wrong on this come the new year. All that bandwidth and wasted time when you could have been practicing your german or jumping off things...China_CAAC_Exam wrote: ↑Wed Nov 14, 2018 10:10 am Diadem, you said:
Based on your own comments, there is not currently a seniority list available, and that you're waiting on Mr Kaplan to make a determination about the state of such a list; yet, in the quote above, you seem to be implying that the list is formalized and available to the MEC, and that they had to create the LOU to counter the dropping of Encore pilots. I think your reasoning is rather weak and specious, and that you're really reaching with this one. Since the contract is still in arbitration, there's no reason to assume that the list has already been set in stone; if the MECs make a unified proposal to WestJet management that they maintain the list, and management agrees, the arbitrator should accept that, seeing as every party wants the same outcome.
I think there is now reason.
Are you so anti-alpa/anti-union that you would attempt to cause chaos and destruction (on a real scale, not just via internet trolling) just to prove a point and stroke your own narcissism? This is the root of the issue, isn't it? Feeding John's ego?