* AvCanada's Home Page * Photo Gallery * Directory * Topsites *Weather *Enter Chat * Media Kit
It is currently Wed Jun 19, 2013 5:21 am



All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is chatting

Who is chatting
Enter Chat




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 36 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Keystone Air
PostPosted: Tue Oct 02, 2012 4:31 am 
Offline
Rank 2
Rank 2

Joined: Wed Apr 14, 2010 2:37 am
Posts: 61
Taking into account the history of the air operator in recent years, the news now is that all their flights are two crew, specifically for the Navajo. Can anyone confirm this? To the Keystone guys out there, how is the operation nowadays? It seems as though they are moving more towards a safety attitude? Would anyone here take the direct entry Co-pilot job on the navajo if it was offered to you, specifically to all you 200 hr guys, instead of working the ramp for 2+ years at Sunwest or Wabusk Air for a cojo spot on the Navajo?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Keystone Air
PostPosted: Tue Oct 02, 2012 5:16 am 
Offline
Rank 4
Rank 4
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2011 11:52 pm
Posts: 264
Location: Global Hobo
I'd rather take 50 grit sandpaper to my private parts then get into one of their airplanes... So yes I'd take 2+ years on the ramp.

E


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Keystone Air
PostPosted: Tue Oct 02, 2012 6:37 am 
Offline
Rank 2
Rank 2

Joined: Wed Apr 14, 2010 2:37 am
Posts: 61
esp803 wrote:
I'd rather take 50 grit sandpaper to my private parts then get into one of their airplanes... So yes I'd take 2+ years on the ramp.

E

I heard that the maintenance at Keystone is pretty good as of now. A buddy of mine who worked at the Esso in Winnipeg said they keep their planes in pretty good shape. Another buddy of mine is captain on the Navajo and said things have improved substantially.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Keystone Air
PostPosted: Tue Oct 02, 2012 4:36 pm 
Offline
Rank 1
Rank 1

Joined: Sat Jan 16, 2010 10:24 pm
Posts: 28
Quote:
Would anyone here take the direct entry Co-pilot job on the navajo if it was offered to you, specifically to all you 200 hr guys, instead of working the ramp for 2+ years at Sunwest or Wabusk Air for a cojo spot on the Navajo?


No.

They're not moving towards a "safety attitude". They stuck an extra guy in the 'Ho because the media after the last crash focused on the fact there was only one pilot on board.

And your direct entry co-pilot job comes with direct entry ramping for half the month anyway. So if you want to get treated like crap on a ramp I suggest you pick a company that's dangling a better carrot than right seat Navajo.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Keystone Air
PostPosted: Tue Oct 02, 2012 6:40 pm 
Offline
Rank 2
Rank 2

Joined: Wed Apr 14, 2010 2:37 am
Posts: 61
Doesnt Sunwest do half ramp half Navajo FO also?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Keystone Air
PostPosted: Tue Oct 02, 2012 9:46 pm 
Offline
Rank Moderator
Rank Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 23, 2004 5:29 pm
Posts: 3598
Location: The Frozen North
No, to the original poster.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Keystone Air
PostPosted: Tue Oct 02, 2012 10:47 pm 
Offline
Rank 2
Rank 2

Joined: Wed Apr 14, 2010 2:37 am
Posts: 61
Two of my buddies work the ramp there and state that its 2 weeks flying and two weeks ramp..


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Keystone Air
PostPosted: Wed Oct 03, 2012 2:42 pm 
Offline
Rank (9)
Rank (9)
User avatar

Joined: Tue Feb 24, 2004 8:54 pm
Posts: 1421
Location: Reality!
Gee WJ733 you seem to have a rebuttal for every comment and have stated you have friends that work there. Why don't you just ask them?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Keystone Air
PostPosted: Wed Oct 03, 2012 7:38 pm 
Offline
Rank 2
Rank 2

Joined: Wed Apr 14, 2010 2:37 am
Posts: 61
Thanks for bringing that up, but I did ask them after my second last post. Nonetheless, with a couple operators out there offering FO spots on the navajo, what, in your opinion singles out Keystone to be at a lower level than others that offer Navajo FO/ramp spots like sunwest and Wabusk, looking at the present and future? Lots immediately say "never in a million years". Ignoring the past, looking at the future, is Keystone really still that bad of a place for a first job in comparison to other companies?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Keystone Air
PostPosted: Wed Oct 03, 2012 10:35 pm 
Online
Rank (9)
Rank (9)
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 12, 2009 2:24 am
Posts: 1408
It's been less than a year since their LATEST accident, how can you know if they have actually cleaned up their act? Seems like you are just trying to justify yourself in applying there and not getting the answers you want.

As CL pointed out, you have a rebuttal to all the points of your friends who work there. Maybe they don't know any better or different or think that abuse of pilots is "just part of the job" or perhaps, they dont want to look like idiots to someone looking up to them. Chalk me up as a guy that would quit aviation and work in a Chinese sweat shop before I would work for them.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Keystone Air
PostPosted: Thu Oct 04, 2012 12:08 am 
Offline
Rank 4
Rank 4
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2011 11:52 pm
Posts: 264
Location: Global Hobo
WJ733 wrote:
I heard that the maintenance at Keystone is pretty good as of now


Nothing to do with maintenance, more corporate culture and a history of shady operations. I know nothing about their maintenance, but even the best maintained bird in the world don't fly without fuel.

WJ733 wrote:
what, in your opinion singles out Keystone to be at a lower level than others that offer Navajo FO/ramp spots like sunwest and Wabusk


2000C1087 : The a/c appears to have impacted terrain with very little forward movement. The fuselage is intact and the occupants were able to exit the a/c on their own. The pilot was able to assist Emergency Services personnel by using a cell phone and providing directions based on sounds. The area where the a/c came to rest is completely enclosed by dense bush and trees and is not visible from a city street, about 300 meters to the north

2002C0623: KEE 208, a PA-31 Navajo with a pilot and six passengers, was arriving at Winnipeg International Airport after an IFR flight from Gunisao Lake, MB. The pilot reportedly was high on the ILS approach to Runway 13 and elected to overshoot. At some time during the missed approach, the pilot advised that he was having an engine problem and ATC provided him with vectors to land on Runway 25. The pilot shortly after, further advised ATC that the second engine had quit. Witnesses on the ground report hearing an engine backfiring as the Navajo passed overhead. The a/c descended into the northwest residential/industrial area of the city and hit the top of a city transit bus, knocked down a traffic light at the intersection of Logan and McPhillips Streets, struck a large delivery truck, then struck a smaller delivery van and impacted a paved street. The a/c came to rest on its left side on top of the left wing about 150 feet west of the intersection. The right wing and engine departed the a/c during the accident sequence. The 7 occupants were injured, with varying degrees of severity and all are in hospital. There were no injuries to anyone on the ground, although the two delivery vehicles struck on the ground were seriously damaged. The bus was only slightly damaged. Weather at the time of the occurrence was between 300 and 400 feet overcast. Four investigators from the TSB are on site. A Minister's Observer from System Safety has been assigned.

2012O0076: The Keystone Air Service Ltd. Piper PA-31-350 aircraft (C-GOSU, operating as flight KEE213) was on an IFR flight from Winnipeg (JARIA) (CYWG) to North Spirit Lake Airport (CKQ3). NAV CANADA staff at Winnipeg ACC advised that J.R.C.C. Trenton staff had reported picking up a 406MHz ELT signal from C-GOSU in the vicinity of North Spirit Lake. At 1620Z, J.R.C.C. Trenton staff confirmed that the aircraft had crashed on North Spirit Lake (accident location 52º30'08"N 092º59'56.1"W). A local rescue party was on the scene. Four fatalities were reported and one survivor was taken to hospital. Transport Canada has appointed a Minister's Observer.

These in top of a general "I'm invincible" attitude to me shows a shady operator to stay away from, I stand by my original thoughts, and the thoughts i expressed in the last Keystone thread which was removed.

E


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Keystone Air
PostPosted: Thu Oct 04, 2012 4:18 am 
Offline
Rank 2
Rank 2

Joined: Wed Apr 14, 2010 2:37 am
Posts: 61
I'm not sure why all the posts refer to the past, since what I am asking is precisely the present and future work place that Keystone would be offering new guys. And to answer an assumption, no I am not applying there since I already work at a different company and am merely expressing interest why, as soon as the company Keystone is brought up in conversation, everyone seems to shut it down right away. Yes there were crashes, but you cannot just focus your attention and use that as an excuse to not consider them as a potential future workplace. I'm not familiar about the past of this forum concerning Keystone, but from what I gather, many of you seem to dislike the company on every level. Would your view change if Keystone manages to clean up and fly safely without Incidences or Accidents within the next five years? Lets just say they would, do you think then, they could build a reputation strong enough to attract interested pilots as much as other companies in the region? Thoughts?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Keystone Air
PostPosted: Thu Oct 04, 2012 5:22 am 
Online
Rank (9)
Rank (9)
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 12, 2009 2:24 am
Posts: 1408
Wow! So when did you acquire the crystal ball? The past (and they a brutal one to be polite) is ALL you have to go on. Company culture doesn't change overnight!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Keystone Air
PostPosted: Thu Oct 04, 2012 8:27 am 
Offline
Rank 4
Rank 4
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2011 11:52 pm
Posts: 264
Location: Global Hobo
You are right, I am being unfair in using the companies past and assuming that they will not changed.... Well based on no accidents today, you can safely assume they will never have another accident.

If you were to take an typical day of flying at any company and use that to foresee the future then every company operating today should not have an accident in the future. If however you look at the history of a company and see that the same types of accidents have occurred time and time again, you can assume the trend will continue... But hey maybe my logic is heavily flawed here....

You asked for an opinion on a company, and from what I have read you have gotten response from some very experienced people in our field (I'm not including myself in that category). You have reject 100% of the feedback. Why bother asking if you already know the answer.

E


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Keystone Air
PostPosted: Thu Oct 04, 2012 12:43 pm 
Offline
Rank (9)
Rank (9)

Joined: Wed Feb 18, 2004 4:36 pm
Posts: 1351
Location: NWT
WJ733 wrote:
I'm not sure why all the posts refer to the past


This is simply because the "past" hasnt changed at all. Same owner, same company culture. The new "FOs" on their PA31 are window dressing at best. Nothing has changed because nothing at the top of this company has changed. What else can we base our opinions on other than past performance? Im with the majority on this one. You are not getting the replies you wanted to justify your working there...so now you question us and our motives? My only motive is to keep young and inexperienced pilots FAR away from this type of company and its culture. Our 703 op ran 31 years accident free, flogging around in PA31s all day everyday. We didnt kill anyone or crash on a regular basis (or at all). Keystones past is simply a reflection of its future. Until ownership changes, nothing at Keystone will either.

Take the ramp job!!

Fly safe all.
FTB


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Keystone Air
PostPosted: Thu Oct 04, 2012 3:29 pm 
Offline
Top Poster
Top Poster

Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2004 2:28 pm
Posts: 8699
I'd rather be dipped in honey, and tied naked over a colony of red ants.
I'd rather be caught in a leather bar wearing my latest assless chaps.
I'd rather wake up beside Camilla Parker Bowles.
You just HAVE to be, a) retarded. b) a complete moron. c) Faaking with us.
If you think the "corporate culture" at Keystone is going to change WITHOUT completely flushing the "toilet" of ALL the turds presently floating in it....you're a DREAMER!

You, you may say
I'm a dreamer, but I'm not the only one
I hope some day you'll join us
And the world will be as one


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Keystone Air
PostPosted: Thu Oct 04, 2012 8:58 pm 
Offline
Rank 11
Rank 11
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 09, 2005 8:26 pm
Posts: 4050
Location: On Borrowed Wings
looks like you caught quite a few sucker fish while trolling :rolleyes:

'A shit leopard doesnt change its spots'


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Keystone Air
PostPosted: Fri Oct 05, 2012 12:01 am 
Offline
Rank 2
Rank 2

Joined: Wed Apr 14, 2010 2:37 am
Posts: 61
The Corporate Culture term comes up quite a bit, could any of you elaborate on why the Culture isnt too good at Keystone? Im just trying to understand the history, besides the crashes, of why the "corporate culture" isnt too great. I saw an add on Avcanada the other week(now deleted) that they were looking for FOs for their Navajos and heard stuff about the company and was merely wondering if any new guys would be willing to apply, and all the responses I got were negative about the company. If I could get some insight of why that is, besides the crash history, I would understand some of your anger towards them. I am still fairly new to aviation so I would like to know as I dont know anyone in the company. And again, no I dont work there nor have a I applied to answer your assumption for the second time.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Keystone Air
PostPosted: Fri Oct 05, 2012 12:12 am 
Offline
Rank (9)
Rank (9)

Joined: Wed Feb 18, 2004 4:36 pm
Posts: 1351
Location: NWT
WJ733 wrote:
The Corporate Culture term comes up quite a bit, could any of you elaborate on why the Culture isnt too good at Keystone?


When "senior management" not only supports but also encourages sacrificing fuel for a revenue seat, that creates a certain unsafe culture. Shit flows downhill.

*Edit for addition of link*
WJ733 you seem sincere. Read this 20 page thread regarding a recent Keystone accident... and it should educate you a bit on why so many of us have "anger issues" when it comes to this particular company. People died that shouldnt have.

viewtopic.php?f=118&t=78853


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Keystone Air
PostPosted: Fri Oct 05, 2012 12:22 am 
Online
Rank (9)
Rank (9)
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 12, 2009 2:24 am
Posts: 1408
Shouldn't crash history be enough to prove the point? 2 fatal crashes in what 2 years with VERY preventable causes due to "company culture"! How can that in itself not be enough for you? Do you not have any self worth? How many other 703 ops have had that record and continue to operate?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Keystone Air
PostPosted: Fri Oct 05, 2012 1:12 am 
Online
Rank 4
Rank 4
User avatar

Joined: Sun Dec 21, 2008 1:24 pm
Posts: 226
Location: YUL
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Keystone Air
PostPosted: Fri Oct 05, 2012 1:29 am 
Offline
Top Poster
Top Poster

Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2004 2:28 pm
Posts: 8699
JMACK wrote:
Image


Either that, or he's denser than a stump!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Keystone Air
PostPosted: Fri Oct 05, 2012 4:48 am 
Offline
Rank (9)
Rank (9)

Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2004 4:34 pm
Posts: 1529
Location: Canada
Is the wait for the Metro at Perimeter getting too long for you?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Keystone Air
PostPosted: Fri Oct 05, 2012 6:43 am 
Offline
Rank 2
Rank 2

Joined: Wed Apr 14, 2010 2:37 am
Posts: 61
Recently, First Air 737 Crashed and had fatalities up in Resolute Bay, Arctic Sunwest Twin Otter on final in Yellowknife water base and had fatalities, Air Tindi C208 crashed and had fatalities. Is there anyone bashing these guys for what happened in their airlines? Do you think their "corporate culture" is bad too? I have only seen mourning about these crashes. I'm not excusing Keystones pilots' action of any kind, but I don't see any negativity going on at other airlines who have had casualties in the past due to accidents that "didn't have to happen". I would hope that Keystone would have learned from their mistakes by now, otherwise TC would have shut them down permanently. Obviously they did something to prove to TC that has kept them afloat. I'm not sure why all of you take my original question with so much disgust. If you cant answer my question without saying "They crashed and killed people, that's enough to bash them" sort of comments, then I'm gonna arrest my case since I'm getting nowhere with this thread. :wink:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Keystone Air
PostPosted: Fri Oct 05, 2012 8:22 am 
Online
Rank (9)
Rank (9)
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 12, 2009 2:24 am
Posts: 1408
Doc, I'm afraid denser than a stump is the culprit. WJ733, I suggest you read the mentioned accident threads and any other threads associated to those companies involved and you will see why your statements are so ridiculous. You are coming across as being foolishly ignorant and uninformed. Don't be lazy, take a couple of hour and do some reading. It's all been discussed before. If you have any reading comprehension whatsoever your answers will become clear very quickly!


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 36 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next


All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Cap'n Tripps and 19 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group

 
For questions/comments please send them to
webmaster@avcanada.ca


AvCanada Topsites List
AVIATION TOP 100 - www.avitop.com Avitop.com

While the administrators and moderators of this  forum will attempt to remove or edit any generally objectionable material as  quickly as possible, it is impossible to review every message. If you feel a  topic or post is inappropriate email us at support@avcanada.ca .  By reading these forums you acknowledge that  all posts made to these forums express the views and opinions of the author and  not the administrators, moderators or webmaster (except for posts by these  people) and hence will not be held liable. This website is not responsible or liable in any way for any false or misleading messages or job ads placed at our site.   

Use AvCanada's information at your own risk!

We reserve the right to remove any messages that we deem unacceptable.
  When you post a message, your IP is logged and may be provided to concerned parties where unethical or illegal  behavior is apparent. All rights reserved.