* AvCanada's Home Page * Photo Gallery * Directory * Topsites *Weather *Enter Chat * Media Kit
It is currently Tue Jun 18, 2013 8:31 am



All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is chatting

Who is chatting
Enter Chat




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 53 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Sun May 13, 2012 5:02 am 
Offline
Rank 1
Rank 1

Joined: Tue Apr 03, 2007 12:35 am
Posts: 47
Location: Campbell River BC Canada
The first flight of the TRACE powered DHC-2 took place in Midland Texas today.
http://www.sealandaviation.com/blog-entry/trace-beaver-flying

The engine is a certified 600 HP V8 that has been installed in Air Tractors. It was originally called the Thunder Engine, then the Orenda. This is the new and improved version manufactured by TRACE Engines in Teaxs.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun May 13, 2012 8:17 am 
Online
Rank 4
Rank 4

Joined: Sun Dec 21, 2008 8:25 pm
Posts: 240
Location: in the bush
Sounds good... But she looks ugly and slightly short of breath at the pointy end...


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun May 13, 2012 4:34 pm 
Offline
Rank 1
Rank 1

Joined: Tue Apr 03, 2007 12:35 am
Posts: 47
Location: Campbell River BC Canada
It needs a paint scheme.
Here's a link to a promo video taken a few weeks ago:
http://youtu.be/Sx81g-ZV3yw


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun May 13, 2012 6:19 pm 
Offline
Rank (9)
Rank (9)
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 19, 2008 1:11 pm
Posts: 1016
Location: On top
Porbably the most expensive engine ever re-designed. If you only knew how many millions of dollars went into that White elephant!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon May 14, 2012 2:33 am 
Offline
Rank 8
Rank 8

Joined: Sat Sep 18, 2004 4:00 pm
Posts: 874
Location: South-East Asia
I wonder what the TBO is supposed to be? Wouldn't those look good on the Beech 18? Anybody have a weight comparison to the R985?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon May 14, 2012 5:01 am 
Offline
Rank 1
Rank 1

Joined: Tue Apr 03, 2007 12:35 am
Posts: 47
Location: Campbell River BC Canada
Presently the TBO is 1500 hours, and, based on trend monitoring with the EDM 930, it will be eligible for TBO extensions.
The installed weight is about 150 lbs heavier than an R985. A Beaver with a TRACE engine will be eligible for a gross weight increase to 6000 pounds.

I agree, they would look good on a Beech 18!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon May 14, 2012 7:18 am 
Offline
Rank (9)
Rank (9)

Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2004 7:28 pm
Posts: 1441
At 400K, I don't see too many people lining up to get it put on their Beaver.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon May 14, 2012 5:55 pm 
Offline
Rank 4
Rank 4

Joined: Sun Jun 21, 2009 2:13 am
Posts: 247
Is a good 985 that hard to find or get overhauled? Wouldn't a PT-6 upgrade be better spent money?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon May 14, 2012 6:16 pm 
Offline
Rank 1
Rank 1

Joined: Tue Apr 03, 2007 12:35 am
Posts: 47
Location: Campbell River BC Canada
At 10,000 feet at cruise we are getting a true airspeed of 190+ mph.
It performs like a Turbo-Beaver.
The install Price will be $325,000 USD including the EDM 950. And the customer gets to keep the old firewall forward which is worth $25,000 to $75,000.

We're excited.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon May 14, 2012 6:25 pm 
Offline
Rank 11
Rank 11
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 09, 2005 8:26 pm
Posts: 4050
Location: On Borrowed Wings
MapleFlag wrote:
Is a good 985 that hard to find or get overhauled? Wouldn't a PT-6 upgrade be better spent money?



Plenty of good 985s out there! Same with PT6s!

Personally I think that price is well beyond what any operator would spend and only some strange private owners might consider it. Plus it looks tragic in my opinion.

Good on you for going outside the norm and experimenting though. I hope it works out


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon May 14, 2012 7:33 pm 
Offline
Rank 7
Rank 7

Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2004 3:21 pm
Posts: 643
Good idea but it still burns 100LL and the supply of that fuel is under pressure to be eliminated. Not to mention 100LL is hard to find in more remote places. I think it needs to be able to run on auto gas to be successful.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon May 14, 2012 9:32 pm 
Offline
Rank 11
Rank 11
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 09, 2005 8:26 pm
Posts: 4050
Location: On Borrowed Wings
The beav with a 985 will run on 80/87 and Mogas..


*edited - damn you autocorrect


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon May 14, 2012 10:55 pm 
Offline
Rank 1
Rank 1

Joined: Tue Apr 03, 2007 12:35 am
Posts: 47
Location: Campbell River BC Canada
Quote:
Good idea but it still burns 100LL and the supply of that fuel is under pressure to be eliminated. Not to mention 100LL is hard to find in more remote places. I think it needs to be able to run on auto gas to be successful.

TRACE has a project underway to get approval for electronic ignition and injection systems. When these approvals are in place the engine can be run on Mogas. They should have the approvals by the end of this year. The electronic injection and ignition can be retrofitted onto the existing engines.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 15, 2012 1:33 am 
Offline
Rank 7
Rank 7

Joined: Sat Jan 08, 2005 2:58 pm
Posts: 625
This sounds like a pretty cool mod, if it works.

What has been done to reslove some of the reliability issues that existed with the engine when it was the Thunder/Orenda? I understand there were head warping issues, along with ignition system issues. One or both of the Orenda test aircraft have been converted to turbine because of the reliability issues ... or so I've heard. I would be concerened about trying to get 600 HP reliably out of less than 600 cubes. That is nearly drag racing pwer/cube territory. Will they really last - what is the highest time Trace running, and what kind of maintenance issues did it have getting there? If everything worked as promised, this would blow the doors off a turbine conversion, and be cheaper lb/mile than the 985.
I would be really interested to see one go in a 500 to 600 hr per season commercial operation ... watch the reliability and dispatch rate.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 15, 2012 2:05 am 
Offline
Rank 2
Rank 2

Joined: Tue Jan 12, 2010 3:16 pm
Posts: 63
What's the overhaul going to cost? And what will be involved in it? New engine, sleeves?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 15, 2012 3:46 am 
Offline
Rank (9)
Rank (9)

Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2004 7:28 pm
Posts: 1441
Flyingsafely, we got quoted $400K to be a launch customer for the install.. This of course was ridiculous and in my humble opinion you will have a really hard time finding people even at the $350K price point. That equals 10 overhauls on a 985... So, even for a real fanatic, they probably won't do it because they can not justify it and don't want to turn a great machine into something it's not. Let the Beaver (one of Canada's 10 greatest engineering accomplishments) stay the way it should be.. The Trace engine will turn the Beaver into something it was not designed to be. IMHO..


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 15, 2012 4:26 am 
Offline
Rank (9)
Rank (9)
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 19, 2008 1:11 pm
Posts: 1016
Location: On top
Hey Twotter.....+1


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 15, 2012 4:27 am 
Offline
Rank 8
Rank 8
User avatar

Joined: Sat Feb 04, 2006 12:30 pm
Posts: 953
Location: Sarnia, Ontario, Canada
I cringe every time I heard that gear chatter, the thing sounds like it is about to fall apart at idle! :shock:

From what I gather it is a good engine, but there are a lot of troubles with the accessories. Having said that...for the price, why wouldn't you go with a Walter or Pratt??


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 15, 2012 4:37 am 
Offline
Rank (9)
Rank (9)
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 19, 2008 1:11 pm
Posts: 1016
Location: On top
Please, please Trace. Would you PUULEASE give me the honor of forking over the discounted price of $400k to be a guinea pig on an engine that has had nothing but failures for the last 15 years. And especially on the most tried and true airplane ever made, eith one of the most reliasble engines built.

How did they ever come up with a TBO of 1,500 hr on an untried and proven engine? :roll:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 15, 2012 4:50 am 
Offline
Rank 11
Rank 11

Joined: Thu Feb 19, 2004 3:17 am
Posts: 3129
Location: West Coast
Yet another example of the triumph of hope over experience.

You see this in aviation all the time. Somebody who is convinced that after decades of failure....."this time it will be a success"


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 15, 2012 5:07 am 
Offline
Rank 1
Rank 1

Joined: Tue Apr 03, 2007 12:35 am
Posts: 47
Location: Campbell River BC Canada
Lost Lake, what failures?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 15, 2012 5:23 am 
Offline
Rank (9)
Rank (9)
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 19, 2008 1:11 pm
Posts: 1016
Location: On top
15 years of R&D failure!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 15, 2012 5:09 pm 
Offline
Rank 3
Rank 3

Joined: Sun Jun 21, 2009 5:02 am
Posts: 120
Can someone tell me what the cost to have the 985 changed over to a PT6 is?
Personally I think the beaver should only have a Pratt on her. How many -2 are still flying using the PZL engine? I know of one, and it's continuously up for sale....


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 15, 2012 8:36 pm 
Offline
Rank 1
Rank 1

Joined: Tue Apr 03, 2007 12:35 am
Posts: 47
Location: Campbell River BC Canada
Quote:
This sounds like a pretty cool mod, if it works.
What has been done to reslove some of the reliability issues that existed with the engine when it was the Thunder/Orenda? I understand there were head warping issues, along with ignition system issues. One or both of the Orenda test aircraft have been converted to turbine because of the reliability issues ... or so I've heard. I would be concerened about trying to get 600 HP reliably out of less than 600 cubes. That is nearly drag racing pwer/cube territory. Will they really last - what is the highest time Trace running, and what kind of maintenance issues did it have getting there? If everything worked as promised, this would blow the doors off a turbine conversion, and be cheaper lb/mile than the 985.
I would be really interested to see one go in a 500 to 600 hr per season commercial operation ... watch the reliability and dispatch rate.


Hornblower, Thanks for asking good questions! I asked the top guy at TRACE, David Czarnecki, to comment. He says:

"Most of the Orenda issues were simply from parts not built exactly to specifications. The design was not the primary issue but the execution of the manufacturing. This was the case with the majority of the components that had service bulletins issued. When the parts were manufactured to spec, tested and flown, the reliability is there.

Many people have no idea how many iterations of design many of the components went through between the Thunder Engine to Orenda and then ultimately to TRACE. At the time Orenda finally achieved type certification the design was solid. TRACE has continued to improve designs to try to extend the TBO and develop and certify a 750 horsepower model of the engine that is the same cubic inches as the current 600 horsepower model. Millions of dollars have been spent on engineering over the years to solve this technical aspect. At the end of the day, the TRACE engine is a refined evolution of both the Thunder and the Orenda engine programs in which the pedigree is good but the teething issues resolved.

As for the two of three aircraft that were converted back to turbines, they were all Otters. The primary reason for that was once Orenda shut the company down in 2003 the customer could no longer get spare parts to maintain the aircraft so they were effectively grounded. The only way to use the aircraft was to change powerplants. On the positive side, the third Otter had its Orenda engine overhauled and brought up to the latest TRACE specifications and will enter service this summer.

Quote:
That is nearly drag racing pwer/cube territory


As for 600hp from 495 cubic inches, you have to get out of thinking air cooled and compare to liquid cooled for horsepower per cubic inch. Air cooled has been roughly 1hp per 2cubic inches. Almost any production high performance automobile is pushing 1hp per cubic inch. Those aren't close to drag racing numbers. Plus the details for the TRACE are 600 horsepower for 5 minutes, then 500 horsepower for max continuous. The TRACE is also turbocharged so you get the power steady up to 20,000ft.


TRACE has accumulated about 1200 hours max on one aircraft; the longest aircraft being in service is an Air Tractor operating 200 to 250 hours a year. TRACE's goal in the last two years has been to aggressively go after high hour operators in the Ag market to build our reputation and hours flown. TRACE went from having 2 aircraft flying to 7 this year, with more deposits on the books for our Ag STCs. We are hoping to get Beaver operators who run 400 to 600 hours a year to use our product. We believe they will be impressed and prove the product for us. This is a working man's engine and needs to be reliable. It will be more cost effective (more profitable for the operator) than a turbine installation.


Beyond the Beaver, TRACE is preparing to develop another platform to STC: a Cessna Caravan for freight application. TRACE already has the 208B in their hanger in Midland and has begun the design of the conversion kit. TRACE has a high volume freight carrier who will rent the aircraft and compare it to their turbine fleet for dispatch rate and reliability. This conversion kit will utilize our 750 horsepower model engine which is being certified concurrently."


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 16, 2012 4:12 pm 
Offline
Rank 7
Rank 7
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2006 6:45 am
Posts: 536
Does the TRACE engine have a reversible prop?


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 53 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3  Next


All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group

 
For questions/comments please send them to
webmaster@avcanada.ca


AvCanada Topsites List
AVIATION TOP 100 - www.avitop.com Avitop.com

While the administrators and moderators of this  forum will attempt to remove or edit any generally objectionable material as  quickly as possible, it is impossible to review every message. If you feel a  topic or post is inappropriate email us at support@avcanada.ca .  By reading these forums you acknowledge that  all posts made to these forums express the views and opinions of the author and  not the administrators, moderators or webmaster (except for posts by these  people) and hence will not be held liable. This website is not responsible or liable in any way for any false or misleading messages or job ads placed at our site.   

Use AvCanada's information at your own risk!

We reserve the right to remove any messages that we deem unacceptable.
  When you post a message, your IP is logged and may be provided to concerned parties where unethical or illegal  behavior is apparent. All rights reserved.