Electrickery

This forum has been developed to discuss maintenance topics in Canada.

Moderators: sky's the limit, sepia, Sulako, North Shore

Post Reply
NeverBlue
Rank 8
Rank 8
Posts: 907
Joined: Mon Feb 04, 2008 12:53 pm

Re: Electrickery.

Post by NeverBlue »

in an appropriate thread
And I guess you decide what's appropriate and what's not?...because??

Please...this is the Internet....

Appropriate??...really?? Discussing aircraft electricity?

Wow...
---------- ADS -----------
 
NeverBlue
Rank 8
Rank 8
Posts: 907
Joined: Mon Feb 04, 2008 12:53 pm

Re: Electrickery.

Post by NeverBlue »

It's too much to read DAR...
---------- ADS -----------
 
User avatar
PilotDAR
Rank 11
Rank 11
Posts: 4053
Joined: Sun Sep 30, 2012 6:46 pm
Location: Near CNJ4 Orillia, Ontario

Re: Electrickery.

Post by PilotDAR »

Appropriate??...really?? Discussing aircraft electricity?

Wow...
In an thread about aircraft electricity, I do think that discussing aircraft electricity is appropriate!
---------- ADS -----------
 
NeverBlue
Rank 8
Rank 8
Posts: 907
Joined: Mon Feb 04, 2008 12:53 pm

Re: Electrickery.

Post by NeverBlue »

 Transport Canada staff will respect more the use of a TC procedure, when it correctly employed - that helps everyone
What world do you live in?

Obviously not my region...
---------- ADS -----------
 
User avatar
PilotDAR
Rank 11
Rank 11
Posts: 4053
Joined: Sun Sep 30, 2012 6:46 pm
Location: Near CNJ4 Orillia, Ontario

Re: Electrickery.

Post by PilotDAR »

What world do you live in?

Obviously not my region...
Some things just work out naturally.....
---------- ADS -----------
 
GyvAir
Rank (9)
Rank (9)
Posts: 1804
Joined: Mon Mar 12, 2012 7:09 pm

Re: Electrickery.

Post by GyvAir »

Can I jump in here with a question about the actual topic?

While I agree with the gist of Neverblue’s assertion here about electrical loads needing to be considered, I do disagree with his interpretation of what is a specific, clear and concise question:
“Does the modification or repair alter an electrical generation device, or the electrical distribution system between the generating source and either its primary distribution bus, or any other bus designated as an essential bus?”
It would alter none of the items mentioned. However, yes, the handheld GPS installation would add a load to the system.

So, with regards to determining minor or major and what the certification requirements are in a scenario such as the hand held GPS installation that hoptwoit outlined, what is the standard or regulation that spells out the requirements for completing an electrical load analysis? 571 Appendix A doesn't address it.

I think it’s within the realm of reason to make an educated determination that, in the absence of other high load additions and modifications, a hand held GPS or a digital clock on its own isn’t going to push any generation or distribution system over the edge. Where though is the line drawn as far as having to do a full blown assessment of the electrical loads and of the generation and distribution system when installing something like this?
What if the customer simply wanted a second post light installed adjacent to an instrument? Can one simply be spliced in, or do we need to add that 40 milliamps to the calculation?
---------- ADS -----------
 
torquey401
Rank 3
Rank 3
Posts: 168
Joined: Thu Feb 28, 2008 5:56 pm

Re: Electrickery.

Post by torquey401 »

AC43.13 11-35 & 11-36.doc
(12 KiB) Downloaded 41 times
Attached is some relevant information on this subject from "Acceptable Methods, Techniques and Practices".

Interesting discussion so far.
---------- ADS -----------
 
User avatar
PilotDAR
Rank 11
Rank 11
Posts: 4053
Joined: Sun Sep 30, 2012 6:46 pm
Location: Near CNJ4 Orillia, Ontario

Re: Electrickery.

Post by PilotDAR »

The reference to do an ELA is found in AC43.13-1B, Paragraph 11-37, though it is brief. Cessna's maintenance manuals provide reasonable data. If you want a really thorough reference, I like this Australian AC:

https://www.casa.gov.au/sites/g/files/n ... 021c38.pdf

Your decision as to when you must do one will probably be based in your level of comfort in possibly having to explain to TC one day why you chose not to! Your reasoning might be good, and acceptable to TC, after the discussion. Perhaps it was easier to do and record the analysis! The fact that we might completely agree that there is a threshold below which it does not matter, still may not satisfy TC....
---------- ADS -----------
 
North Shore
Rank Moderator
Rank Moderator
Posts: 5602
Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2004 3:47 pm
Location: Straight outta Dundarave...

Re: Electrickery.

Post by North Shore »

Gentlemen ( & Ladies?):

I split the thread on G-meters as it was drifting into a discussion of electrical systems. The opening post in this thread, by NeverBlue, was the logical starting point for that split. NeverBlue had nothing to do with creating the split; further, the title of this thread: 'Electrickery', was my name choice, not NB's.

My apologies for any confusion this has created.

North Shore.
---------- ADS -----------
 
Say, what's that mountain goat doing up here in the mist?
Happiness is V1 at Thompson!
Ass, Licence, Job. In that order.
NeverBlue
Rank 8
Rank 8
Posts: 907
Joined: Mon Feb 04, 2008 12:53 pm

Re: Electrickery

Post by NeverBlue »

Quote:
(7) alter an electrical generation device, or the electrical distribution system between the generating source and either its primary distribution bus, or any other bus designated as an essential bus?

Information Note:

The electrical distribution system includes its associated control devices, and all its protection devices.


...just wondering how you answered no to this question?
THAT WAS THREAD DRIFT?????

:smt040

...and (7) says everything I need to know about what's major and what's not from an 'E' point of view.

It's not 5 paragraphs long attempting to explain it...with some sort of demented thought process.

CAR's is very clear to me...who has been doing avionics mods for over 25 years.

Never has it been acceptable to install anything directly off of the essential bus on a certified aircraft without approved data.

Imagine...someone could install 3 panel mounted radios off the essential bus and sign it out as a minor mod because they felt it was "within their level of comfort" that it's not going to affect anything really....
:shock:
---------- ADS -----------
 
User avatar
PilotDAR
Rank 11
Rank 11
Posts: 4053
Joined: Sun Sep 30, 2012 6:46 pm
Location: Near CNJ4 Orillia, Ontario

Re: Electrickery

Post by PilotDAR »

THAT WAS THREAD DRIFT?????
In a thread about G meter installation, which is entirely non electrical.... Yes. Probably the G meter OP gave up and left the thread out of frustration.

As the CARs are clear to you, excellent, apply them as you see appropriate to the work you do. As I said, you work in your world, I'll work in mine. I don't sign for avionics installations in certified aircraft.
---------- ADS -----------
 
User avatar
Strega
Rank (9)
Rank (9)
Posts: 1767
Joined: Sun Oct 02, 2005 8:44 am
Location: NWO

Re: Electrickery

Post by Strega »

Different rules for different people.
---------- ADS -----------
 
Rule books are paper - they will not cushion a sudden meeting of stone and metal.
— Ernest K. Gann, 'Fate is the Hunter.
torquey401
Rank 3
Rank 3
Posts: 168
Joined: Thu Feb 28, 2008 5:56 pm

Re: Electrickery

Post by torquey401 »

Different strokes for different folks I guess. Good discussion none the less.
---------- ADS -----------
 
NeverBlue
Rank 8
Rank 8
Posts: 907
Joined: Mon Feb 04, 2008 12:53 pm

Re: Electrickery

Post by NeverBlue »

It doesn't matter if you delete my posts NS.

They have been recorded...
Your pattern is clear.
---------- ADS -----------
 
GyvAir
Rank (9)
Rank (9)
Posts: 1804
Joined: Mon Mar 12, 2012 7:09 pm

Re: Electrickery

Post by GyvAir »

NeverBlue wrote:It doesn't matter if you delete my posts NS.

They have been recorded...
Your pattern is clear.
Are you going to sue? I'm not sure I want to participate here if I'm at risk of being subpoenaed as a witness.
---------- ADS -----------
 
GyvAir
Rank (9)
Rank (9)
Posts: 1804
Joined: Mon Mar 12, 2012 7:09 pm

Re: Electrickery

Post by GyvAir »

On the actual topic again:

“Does the modification or repair:
(8) reduce the storage capacity of the primary battery?”

Is this a backwards way of saying

‘Does the modification or repair increase the total anticipated load placed on the battery in the event of a power generation failure?’

or are they actually talking about installing a battery of lesser capacity?
---------- ADS -----------
 
User avatar
PilotDAR
Rank 11
Rank 11
Posts: 4053
Joined: Sun Sep 30, 2012 6:46 pm
Location: Near CNJ4 Orillia, Ontario

Re: Electrickery

Post by PilotDAR »

I think its a very awkward way of saying that it's a major mod if you are not still assuring the requirement for 30 minute run time on the battery, for the basic plane's systems.
---------- ADS -----------
 
NeverBlue
Rank 8
Rank 8
Posts: 907
Joined: Mon Feb 04, 2008 12:53 pm

Re: Electrickery

Post by NeverBlue »

Exactly right...which is why you can't simply hook something up to your primary...or in the case of many GA aircraft...the only bus.
---------- ADS -----------
 
GyvAir
Rank (9)
Rank (9)
Posts: 1804
Joined: Mon Mar 12, 2012 7:09 pm

Re: Electrickery

Post by GyvAir »

Thanks for the references, torquey401 and PilotDAR.

43.13-1B gives criteria on determining if a change in weight and/or balance resulting from a modification or repair is negligible or not.

Is anybody aware of any such criteria given for determining that a change in electrical load could be legally considered to be negligible?

I’m not going to lose a minute of sleep over the post lights I’ve added, or other similar low milliamp increasing mods I’ve been involved with where no ELA was performed. However, it would be nice to have a nice black and white line, rather than the apparent all-or-nothing situation that exists where, as PilotDAR points out, you may find yourself having to make a case to a TC inspector who doesn’t necessarily see things the same as you do.
---------- ADS -----------
 
DonutHole
Rank 8
Rank 8
Posts: 752
Joined: Thu Sep 13, 2012 7:36 pm

Re: Electrickery

Post by DonutHole »

7) alter an electrical generation device, or the electrical distribution system between the generating source and either its primary distribution bus, or any other bus designated as an essential bus?
Why would they reference physical locations if they were actually talking about the load on the generation device? This seem to be a standard that is only talking about where you can take power for a minor mod, not how much overall current you would be drawing if everything was turned on... that would read differently no? By not mentioning the impact on the capacity of the generating source they have eliminated it from consideration, otherwise there would be direct mention of 'current' 'voltage' or 'capacity'

If you read that and took a few amps off the main buss after the feed connection, how could somebody tell you you are wrong if you pointed back to that statement?

Blue isn't reading it literally, is reading it theoretically and adding his thought to make the text make sense. If you read it literally, if u don't alter the feed line between the generator and the buss, then you're golden. If you add a bunch of words tt don't exist in the CARS then you end up where blue is taking us.
---------- ADS -----------
 
Post Reply

Return to “Maintenance”