Gregg Saretsky is the modern Frank Lorenzo

Discuss topics relating to Westjet.

Moderators: sky's the limit, sepia, Sulako, lilfssister, North Shore, I WAS Birddog

The Hammer
Rank 6
Rank 6
Posts: 437
Joined: Tue Mar 16, 2004 6:46 am

Re: Gregg Saretsky is the modern Frank Lorenzo

Post by The Hammer »

Mixing up the crews keeps morale lower and prevents the pilot group and FA group from forming any kind of organization. It's not an accident.

I love how WestJet circled the wagons and protected Captain M with the FA becoming the "problem". Do you think that would happen today with the #metoo" movement?
---------- ADS -----------
 
Fanblade
Rank (9)
Rank (9)
Posts: 1693
Joined: Mon Mar 28, 2011 8:50 pm

Re: Gregg Saretsky is the modern Frank Lorenzo

Post by Fanblade »

Legacy wrote: Mon Feb 12, 2018 5:26 pm Myself and probably 90% of the company can't wait for this guy to be gone for good. Always easier to destroy than to create and he had proven this time and time again.
I’m not trying to defend Saretsky but he was hired by the WJ BOD to take WJ in a different direction. He is just the face of change. If it was not him it would be someone else.

The BOD’s primary focus is shareholder valuations whether we are willing to admit it or not. If the company doesn’t grow, the share price doesn’t grow. So the company MUST grow.

Prior to Saretsky’s arrival WJ was approaching the end of what they could do with a 737. The end of growth. Remember when Sean Durphy was taking WJ in the direction of a code share with a Southwest as growth? A code share that would have limited WJ to just Southwest? Very limited further growth.

Saretsky’s plan. Code share with everyone. Why not, unless you have a Star partner you don’t have connections in Canada.

Create a feeder to increase code share and feed to mainline and eventually WB expansion.

Huge growth. Although Saretsky may be the face of the change and conflict, it is really the BOD that has made the decision to go in the direction it has.

That’s the thing we must remember. It’s not our business. It’s the BOD’s to run. If they want to change it, it is thier right to do so. Resisting change will not work. That just ends in a steam roller and acrimony.

The face of leadership will come and go. Each face will have a different agenda. Some you will like. Some you will hate.


The only say we get is what we are willing to sell our services for.

Do not take your eye off the ball on the one thing we have a say on. They want you to through either love or threat. Ignore the clatter.

Eye on the ball.
---------- ADS -----------
 
User avatar
infiniteregulus
Rank 4
Rank 4
Posts: 231
Joined: Sat Apr 18, 2015 3:46 am

Re: Gregg Saretsky is the modern Frank Lorenzo

Post by infiniteregulus »

Do keep in mind that flight crew comprise a very small percentage of a passenger's ticket. We're talking a matter of a few dollars at most. So to reduce one's salary by 50% is equivalent to reducing a passenger's airline ticket by $1-2 (crew seniority dependant obviously). So for them to say this new airline hinges on the price tag of crew is complete BS. Seriously, do the math for yourselves. That difference equates to savings for them to make profits elsewhere. Don't give in to this brainwashing! I agree - eye on the ball!
---------- ADS -----------
 
Greenbastard
Rank 1
Rank 1
Posts: 19
Joined: Sat Jan 13, 2018 5:33 am

Re: Gregg Saretsky is the modern Frank Lorenzo

Post by Greenbastard »

“ Keep your eye on the ball”
Moving tails from from one part of the company to another part. Then make less revenue ( although lower casm), does not equate to growth. This internal airline within an Airline has poor track record in North America. Airlines typically grow by adding more tails and seats ( larger planes ) and/or increase revenue per seat. Airlines are always (like any business) are constantly looking to lower costs.
---------- ADS -----------
 
Fanblade
Rank (9)
Rank (9)
Posts: 1693
Joined: Mon Mar 28, 2011 8:50 pm

Re: Gregg Saretsky is the modern Frank Lorenzo

Post by Fanblade »

Greenbastard wrote: Wed Feb 21, 2018 11:33 am “ Keep your eye on the ball”
Moving tails from from one part of the company to another part. Then make less revenue ( although lower casm), does not equate to growth. This internal airline within an Airline has poor track record in North America. Airlines typically grow by adding more tails and seats ( larger planes ) and/or increase revenue per seat. Airlines are always (like any business) are constantly looking to lower costs.
It is growth for WJ if those tails are replaced with Max’s. Maybe not for you, but certainly from the shareholders perspective.

But it doesn’t matter. Don’t get caught up in the distraction. Growth, airline within an airline. Doesn’t matter. They will do what they will do. It may work. It might not. Ultimately it is thier company and we have no say or control. We as pilots feel like we own something within our companies. We take great pride in them. We are loyal to them. We give our entire careers to them. That attachment is emotional and is easy fodder to be USED against us.

The only important statement you made was the last one. And it was a great one because it has its eye on the ball.
---------- ADS -----------
 
FL410AV8R
Rank 3
Rank 3
Posts: 124
Joined: Thu Jan 25, 2018 8:56 pm

Re: Gregg Saretsky is the modern Frank Lorenzo

Post by FL410AV8R »

Greenbastard wrote: Wed Feb 21, 2018 11:33 am “ Keep your eye on the ball”
Moving tails from from one part of the company to another part. Then make less revenue ( although lower casm), does not equate to growth. This internal airline within an Airline has poor track record in North America. Airlines typically grow by adding more tails and seats ( larger planes ) and/or increase revenue per seat. Airlines are always (like any business) are constantly looking to lower costs.
I agree G, airline history is littered with the remnants of the airline within an airline model. I am stupefied that WJ management thinks that they are somehow smarter than everyone else and can somehow pull this off especially given the looming shortage of qualified airline pilots coming up through our broken industry.

Air Canada Tango a low-cost no-frills service offered by Air Canada that operated from 2001 to 2004 also, Zip from 2002 to 2004
Delta Express a low-cost subsidiary of Delta from 1996 until 2003 that preceded Song.
MetroJet a low-cost subsidiary of US Airways that operated from 1998 until 2001
Shuttle by United a low-cost subsidiary of United that operated from 1994 until 2001 and preceded Ted
Song a low-cost subsidiary of Delta that operated from 2003 until 2006 that replaced Delta Express
---------- ADS -----------
 
mbav8r
Rank 10
Rank 10
Posts: 2325
Joined: Sun Jul 02, 2006 8:11 am
Location: Manitoba

Re: Gregg Saretsky is the modern Frank Lorenzo

Post by mbav8r »

Keeping with the theme of keeping your eyes on the ball, airline within an airline has a purpose, drive wages lower, in that respect most have probably been successful!
---------- ADS -----------
 
Fanblade
Rank (9)
Rank (9)
Posts: 1693
Joined: Mon Mar 28, 2011 8:50 pm

Re: Gregg Saretsky is the modern Frank Lorenzo

Post by Fanblade »

infiniteregulus wrote: Wed Feb 21, 2018 10:32 am Do keep in mind that flight crew comprise a very small percentage of a passenger's ticket. We're talking a matter of a few dollars at most. So to reduce one's salary by 50% is equivalent to reducing a passenger's airline ticket by $1-2 (crew seniority dependant obviously). So for them to say this new airline hinges on the price tag of crew is complete BS. Seriously, do the math for yourselves. That difference equates to savings for them to make profits elsewhere. Don't give in to this brainwashing! I agree - eye on the ball!
It’s not just about the initial cost savings. It’s about slowing down cost creep overall. Once Swoop is implemented the plan is for you to spend a decade of bargaining focused on fixing swoop rather than gains at WJ. Look no further than the amount of effort put in by ACPA to fix Rouge.

Secondly although you are correct about your assertion that pilot unit cost overall is small. The problem is that your numbers in and of itself paint a misleading picture. If your costs are peanuts, why then are you a target?

For one, most of an airlines costs are fixed. If you strip out fixed cost your unit cost sky rockets. Moreover your costs are the second highest unit cost in the entire employee group. Take your wages per hour and divide it by the amount of seats behind you to get a cost/seat hour. Do the same for FA’s and divide by 50 seats to come up with thier cost per seat hour.

Interesting exercise isn’t it.

Your two groups make all other employees cost/seat hour look like peanuts. That’s why they aren’t trying to out source their jobs at Swoop or Encore.

Your representation can’t spin it this way for you because it plays into management. But make no mistake about it. Your a target. As a bonus if they get you, they also get the FA’s.

ACPA realized a while ago. For your own good detach yourself from the FA’s.

Eye on the ball
---------- ADS -----------
 
BE20 Driver
Rank 7
Rank 7
Posts: 571
Joined: Mon May 17, 2010 12:58 pm

Re: Gregg Saretsky is the modern Frank Lorenzo

Post by BE20 Driver »

I don't have any issues with change. I don't think the majority of my colleagues do either. The issue with Gregg and the BOD is change management. How they treat the employees says a lot about Gregg and the BOD. You can still implement change and be respectful of your employees. These things are not mutually exclusive. Personally, I think that we missed an opportunity to have everyone rowing in the same direction and because of it we are setting up a decade of labour strife. Think AC vs Canadian 15 years ago. The damage that is being done is going to take a very long time to get over.
---------- ADS -----------
 
Legacy
Rank 7
Rank 7
Posts: 539
Joined: Tue Jan 04, 2005 9:05 pm

Re: Gregg Saretsky is the modern Frank Lorenzo

Post by Legacy »

All I know is this sounds extremely familiar

https://www.cio.com/article/2447004/car ... -boss.html
---------- ADS -----------
 
Realitychex
Rank 6
Rank 6
Posts: 493
Joined: Sat Dec 23, 2006 2:37 pm

Re: Gregg Saretsky is the modern Frank Lorenzo

Post by Realitychex »

You are in la la land if you don't think there's an opportunity for a ULCC in Canada.

Is it as big an opportunity as the opportunity WJ had to exploit a void in 1996? Probably not. But it's there and WJ needs to absolutely dominate and control it in order to protect the larger franchise. Take a quick look at what jetsgo did to WJ over an 18 month window and thank your lucky stars it was run by Mike the White and not someone who knew what they were doing.

Remember what happened to Canadian when they wouldn't / couldn't protect their back door from 1996 to late 1999?

Be very thankful none of the current crop of ULCC wannabees that have been floating around the market for 5 years have gotten their poop in a group. If a WJ 2.0 started tomorrow, led by some bright, energetic guys, like WJ 1.0 22 years ago, WJ pilots would have a hell of a lot more things to worry about than figuring out how to give WJ the flexibility to operate a dozen tails to be able to protect pilots, (and others) long term career prospects by operating Swoop, with legitimate, no BS, low costs.

WJ ALPA leader need to ensure that they selfishly protect WJ ALPA pilots first, and THEN ALPA pilots second. ALPA could give a tinkers cuss what happens to WJ pilots in the long run as WJ pilots represent a miniscule % of their overall membership.

ALPA would like to see every ULCC / new entrant disappear to ensure status quo amongst their largest pilot groups. It's never going to happen. Stubbornly posturing as if it will is the height of arrogance. And to believe that someone out there won't come up with a business plan and the right people to do it correctly is complete foolishness. AC, CP, C3, Royal others thought the same thing in 1996. All declared bankruptcy and 3/4 failed.

More than most, pilots should be more than familiar with the term "stay ahead of the power curve".

8)
---------- ADS -----------
 
tbaylx
Rank (9)
Rank (9)
Posts: 1193
Joined: Fri Jun 25, 2004 6:30 pm

Re: Gregg Saretsky is the modern Frank Lorenzo

Post by tbaylx »

Realitychex wrote: Tue Feb 27, 2018 10:48 am You are in la la land if you don't think there's an opportunity for a ULCC in Canada.

Is it as big an opportunity as the opportunity WJ had to exploit a void in 1996? Probably not. But it's there and WJ needs to absolutely dominate and control it in order to protect the larger franchise. Take a quick look at what jetsgo did to WJ over an 18 month window and thank your lucky stars it was run by Mike the White and not someone who knew what they were doing.

Remember what happened to Canadian when they wouldn't / couldn't protect their back door from 1996 to late 1999?

Be very thankful none of the current crop of ULCC wannabees that have been floating around the market for 5 years have gotten their poop in a group. If a WJ 2.0 started tomorrow, led by some bright, energetic guys, like WJ 1.0 22 years ago, WJ pilots would have a hell of a lot more things to worry about than figuring out how to give WJ the flexibility to operate a dozen tails to be able to protect pilots, (and others) long term career prospects by operating Swoop, with legitimate, no BS, low costs.

WJ ALPA leader need to ensure that they selfishly protect WJ ALPA pilots first, and THEN ALPA pilots second. ALPA could give a tinkers cuss what happens to WJ pilots in the long run as WJ pilots represent a miniscule % of their overall membership.

ALPA would like to see every ULCC / new entrant disappear to ensure status quo amongst their largest pilot groups. It's never going to happen. Stubbornly posturing as if it will is the height of arrogance. And to believe that someone out there won't come up with a business plan and the right people to do it correctly is complete foolishness. AC, CP, C3, Royal others thought the same thing in 1996. All declared bankruptcy and 3/4 failed.

More than most, pilots should be more than familiar with the term "stay ahead of the power curve".

8)
This...might be a day where you look back and realize management may just have saved a few jobs at mainline with Swoop.
---------- ADS -----------
 
AvifiskAlly
Rank 2
Rank 2
Posts: 96
Joined: Mon Jan 29, 2018 5:42 pm

Re: Gregg Saretsky is the modern Frank Lorenzo

Post by AvifiskAlly »

tbaylx wrote: Tue Feb 27, 2018 12:59 pm
Realitychex wrote: Tue Feb 27, 2018 10:48 am You are in la la land if you don't think there's an opportunity for a ULCC in Canada.

Is it as big an opportunity as the opportunity WJ had to exploit a void in 1996? Probably not. But it's there and WJ needs to absolutely dominate and control it in order to protect the larger franchise. Take a quick look at what jetsgo did to WJ over an 18 month window and thank your lucky stars it was run by Mike the White and not someone who knew what they were doing.

Remember what happened to Canadian when they wouldn't / couldn't protect their back door from 1996 to late 1999?

Be very thankful none of the current crop of ULCC wannabees that have been floating around the market for 5 years have gotten their poop in a group. If a WJ 2.0 started tomorrow, led by some bright, energetic guys, like WJ 1.0 22 years ago, WJ pilots would have a hell of a lot more things to worry about than figuring out how to give WJ the flexibility to operate a dozen tails to be able to protect pilots, (and others) long term career prospects by operating Swoop, with legitimate, no BS, low costs.

WJ ALPA leader need to ensure that they selfishly protect WJ ALPA pilots first, and THEN ALPA pilots second. ALPA could give a tinkers cuss what happens to WJ pilots in the long run as WJ pilots represent a miniscule % of their overall membership.

ALPA would like to see every ULCC / new entrant disappear to ensure status quo amongst their largest pilot groups. It's never going to happen. Stubbornly posturing as if it will is the height of arrogance. And to believe that someone out there won't come up with a business plan and the right people to do it correctly is complete foolishness. AC, CP, C3, Royal others thought the same thing in 1996. All declared bankruptcy and 3/4 failed.

More than most, pilots should be more than familiar with the term "stay ahead of the power curve".

8)
This...might be a day where you look back and realize management may just have saved a few jobs at mainline with Swoop.
:supz: :supz: :prayer: :prayer:
---------- ADS -----------
 
User avatar
saltypilot
Rank 2
Rank 2
Posts: 50
Joined: Sat Jun 26, 2004 7:56 am

Re: Gregg Saretsky is the modern Frank Lorenzo

Post by saltypilot »

Realitychex wrote: Tue Feb 27, 2018 10:48 am You are in la la land if you don't think there's an opportunity for a ULCC in Canada.

Is it as big an opportunity as the opportunity WJ had to exploit a void in 1996? Probably not. But it's there and WJ needs to absolutely dominate and control it in order to protect the larger franchise. Take a quick look at what jetsgo did to WJ over an 18 month window and thank your lucky stars it was run by Mike the White and not someone who knew what they were doing.

Remember what happened to Canadian when they wouldn't / couldn't protect their back door from 1996 to late 1999?

Be very thankful none of the current crop of ULCC wannabees that have been floating around the market for 5 years have gotten their poop in a group. If a WJ 2.0 started tomorrow, led by some bright, energetic guys, like WJ 1.0 22 years ago, WJ pilots would have a hell of a lot more things to worry about than figuring out how to give WJ the flexibility to operate a dozen tails to be able to protect pilots, (and others) long term career prospects by operating Swoop, with legitimate, no BS, low costs.

WJ ALPA leader need to ensure that they selfishly protect WJ ALPA pilots first, and THEN ALPA pilots second. ALPA could give a tinkers cuss what happens to WJ pilots in the long run as WJ pilots represent a miniscule % of their overall membership.

ALPA would like to see every ULCC / new entrant disappear to ensure status quo amongst their largest pilot groups. It's never going to happen. Stubbornly posturing as if it will is the height of arrogance. And to believe that someone out there won't come up with a business plan and the right people to do it correctly is complete foolishness. AC, CP, C3, Royal others thought the same thing in 1996. All declared bankruptcy and 3/4 failed.

More than most, pilots should be more than familiar with the term "stay ahead of the power curve".

8)
It’s as simple as this boys & girls... Westjet flying by Westjet pilots at Westjet rates and Westjet working conditions.

The majority aren’t saying no...they’re saying no, not for those wages & working conditions. Westjet pilots WILL protect the flanks using whatever colours and fee for service scheme the executive cook up...AS LONG AS... yes you guessed it. Same wages. Same working conditions.

The majority are also no saying no to others applying. They are saying, some not so eloquently, “Please wait until we have signed an agreement with our company...the end result is it will be better for everyone that way”. Rising tides raising all ships and all that.

If the lower ticket prices & projected profits hinge on pilots taking the haircut so that everyone else may gain then that is a flawed business plan friends.

This is a greasy game of divide & conquer being played right now that the majority want no part of.

Our profession need not be defiled any further.

Respect yourselves. Respect your fellow aviators.

Stand fast, be patient, and be united.
---------- ADS -----------
 
moe
Rank 4
Rank 4
Posts: 250
Joined: Fri Feb 20, 2004 3:20 pm

Re: Gregg Saretsky is the modern Frank Lorenzo

Post by moe »

this ^^^^
---------- ADS -----------
 
tbaylx
Rank (9)
Rank (9)
Posts: 1193
Joined: Fri Jun 25, 2004 6:30 pm

Re: Gregg Saretsky is the modern Frank Lorenzo

Post by tbaylx »

So anyone taking your advice and not applying now so that wages can be on par will slot in as a DEC at $120K a year? Nope, he'd end up right seat on a Q for $40K a year.

Not much incentive for a DEC candidate looking to come home from overseas to wait for ALPA to try and argue common employer.

I get where ALPA is coming from but I wouldn't be vilifying anyone that wants a shot at a startup DEC spot. Like it or not Swoop is the best paying 705 DEC job in the country at the moment, and on par with other 737 operators (Sunwing, Transat, Flair, First Air, Canadian North)
---------- ADS -----------
 
Legacy
Rank 7
Rank 7
Posts: 539
Joined: Tue Jan 04, 2005 9:05 pm

Re: Gregg Saretsky is the modern Frank Lorenzo

Post by Legacy »

tbaylx wrote: Tue Feb 27, 2018 4:00 pm So anyone taking your advice and not applying now so that wages can be on par will slot in as a DEC at $120K a year? Nope, he'd end up right seat on a Q for $40K a year.

Not much incentive for a DEC candidate looking to come home from overseas to wait for ALPA to try and argue common employer.

I get where ALPA is coming from but I wouldn't be vilifying anyone that wants a shot at a startup DEC spot. Like it or not Swoop is the best paying 705 DEC job in the country at the moment, and on par with other 737 operators (Sunwing, Transat, Flair, First Air, Canadian North)
Yeah good god cause why on earth would anyone want to be patient and wait for better working conditions for anyone in this industry. I bet all your above mentioned pilot groups hopes Swoop pilots get a lot better pay so they can go to the negotiation table next round in their contract. Some of these happy with status quo pilots completely destroy this industry and its future. Do you honestly think a 130,000 salary over a 110,000 salary is going to be the make it or break it of Swoop? That’s a yearly 2.4 mill difference. I bet you any money Swoop pays way less than 2.4 million in fuel compared to any of these start up companies since they will be paying the price/litre what WJ pays.
---------- ADS -----------
 
Benwa
Rank 8
Rank 8
Posts: 850
Joined: Sun Feb 15, 2004 8:28 pm
Location: CYQB

Re: Gregg Saretsky is the modern Frank Lorenzo

Post by Benwa »

Where will that DEC job get you once we get the WJ Pilot List thing figured out as per our contract? Direct Entry FO.

Don't leave your current job just yet.
---------- ADS -----------
 
--In his wrapup remarks, the FAA chief said, "If you think the safety bar is set too high, then your
standards are set too low."
tbaylx
Rank (9)
Rank (9)
Posts: 1193
Joined: Fri Jun 25, 2004 6:30 pm

Re: Gregg Saretsky is the modern Frank Lorenzo

Post by tbaylx »

You guys have a lot more faith in the CIRB than I do.

Just sayin it might not be mainline wages but they are inline with every other 737 operator and I don't hear too many people complaining about those wages. Best of luck to you guys.
---------- ADS -----------
 
jjj
Rank 7
Rank 7
Posts: 746
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2004 12:53 am

Re: Gregg Saretsky is the modern Frank Lorenzo

Post by jjj »

tbaylx wrote: Tue Feb 27, 2018 4:00 pm So anyone taking your advice and not applying now so that wages can be on par will slot in as a DEC at $120K a year? Nope, he'd end up right seat on a Q for $40K a year.

Not much incentive for a DEC candidate looking to come home from overseas to wait for ALPA to try and argue common employer.

I get where ALPA is coming from but I wouldn't be vilifying anyone that wants a shot at a startup DEC spot. Like it or not Swoop is the best paying 705 DEC job in the country at the moment, and on par with other 737 operators (Sunwing, Transat, Flair, First Air, Canadian North)
I frankly don’t give a rat’s ass for the poor unfortunate expat who wants to come home with his pockets lined with cash. I do care about the First Officers that have already put in several years of service and don’t want the goal posts moved once again.

I’m sorry if that means a returning ex pat may only have a fair spot at the bottom of our list in recognition of his time served under WestJet and it’s affiliates.

I think the poor unfortunate expat will have a fair shot at retirement unlike the FOs around here if SWOOP gets out of the barn the way triple G wants it.
---------- ADS -----------
 
Post Reply

Return to “WestJet”