787 Pilots

Discuss topics relating to Westjet.

Moderators: sky's the limit, sepia, Sulako, lilfssister, North Shore, I WAS Birddog

Tango Niner
Rank 0
Rank 0
Posts: 12
Joined: Tue Apr 10, 2018 4:59 pm

Re: 787 Pilots

Post by Tango Niner »

complexintentions wrote: Tue Jun 18, 2019 7:04 am Oh, and guys, you don't need to tell every Shannon and London controller you're CPDLC every time you check in, they know. :mrgreen:
Thank you! This one's a personal pet peeve.
The only people that you need to say "CPDLC" to are non-radar guys (i.e. oceanic. Shanwick, Gander Radio etc)
If they have you on radar, they already know.
Rant over! That felt good :D
---------- ADS -----------
 
ahramin
Rank Moderator
Rank Moderator
Posts: 6310
Joined: Tue Feb 17, 2004 5:21 pm
Location: Vancouver

Re: 787 Pilots

Post by ahramin »

That's funny Tango Niner since there is no requirement to tell Gander or Shanwick radio that you are CPDLC since they already know.

CPDLC isn't something that shows up on radar, it's something included in your flight plan.
---------- ADS -----------
 
altiplano
Top Poster
Top Poster
Posts: 5382
Joined: Sat Jan 22, 2005 2:24 pm

Re: 787 Pilots

Post by altiplano »

You used to have to say it with the oceanic check in... maybe 4 or 5 years ago it changed...
---------- ADS -----------
 
Legacy
Rank 7
Rank 7
Posts: 539
Joined: Tue Jan 04, 2005 9:05 pm

Re: 787 Pilots

Post by Legacy »

complexintentions wrote: Tue Jun 18, 2019 7:04 am
altiplano wrote: Mon Jun 17, 2019 8:10 pmI'm not saying it that way, it makes less sense than just a clear readback.

Reading it back the way you're supposed to IS the clearest way. No one really cares what you think about who's the "master of the English language" or what you "believe is superfluous" or other such irrelevant nonsense.

The redundancy is by design, to mitigate the increased risk of such a conditional clearance, hence the last word is repeated as the most important one - "BEHIND".

But hey, you be you.

Just another North American pilot everyone rolls their eyes at on the radio.

Oh, and guys, you don't need to tell every Shannon and London controller you're CPDLC every time you check in, they know. :mrgreen:
You think we don't roll eyes at some Europeans? Especially when they have engine fires on take off on the West coast and still elect to continue to the UK. Actually, we don't roll our eyes, we usually just say WTF!!!!!!?
---------- ADS -----------
 
PostmasterGeneral
Rank 8
Rank 8
Posts: 844
Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2009 3:50 pm

Re: 787 Pilots

Post by PostmasterGeneral »

altiplano wrote: Thu Jun 20, 2019 5:59 pm You used to have to say it with the oceanic check in... maybe 4 or 5 years ago it changed...
Then there’s always the one guy who insists on proper phraseology “charlie papa delta Lima charlie” :roll:
---------- ADS -----------
 
Tango Niner
Rank 0
Rank 0
Posts: 12
Joined: Tue Apr 10, 2018 4:59 pm

Re: 787 Pilots

Post by Tango Niner »

ahramin wrote: Thu Jun 20, 2019 4:49 pm That's funny Tango Niner since there is no requirement to tell Gander or Shanwick radio that you are CPDLC since they already know.

CPDLC isn't something that shows up on radar, it's something included in your flight plan.
Even less to say! Excellent! Thanks for the info Ahramin.
T9
---------- ADS -----------
 
iflyforpie
Top Poster
Top Poster
Posts: 8132
Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2008 12:25 pm
Location: Winterfell...

Re: 787 Pilots

Post by iflyforpie »

complexintentions wrote: Tue Jun 18, 2019 7:04 am Oh, and guys, you don't need to tell every Shannon and London controller you're CPDLC every time you check in, they know. :mrgreen:
I hear more Europeans and Asians say this than North Americans.
---------- ADS -----------
 
Geez did I say that....? Or just think it....?
Eric Janson
Rank (9)
Rank (9)
Posts: 1249
Joined: Thu Feb 08, 2007 10:44 am

Re: 787 Pilots

Post by Eric Janson »

Legacy wrote: Fri Jun 21, 2019 2:32 am You think we don't roll eyes at some Europeans? Especially when they have engine fires on take off on the West coast and still elect to continue to the UK. Actually, we don't roll our eyes, we usually just say WTF!!!!!!?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/British_A ... Flight_268

Engine was shut down after a surge. Not a fire.

There are no restrictions on 3 Engine flight with a 4 Engine aircraft - it's different than a twin. There is no requirement to land at the nearest suitable airport.

One variant of the Type I fly will actually fly further on 3 Engines. If you're not too heavy the aircraft will even maintain current altitude and speed.
---------- ADS -----------
 
Always fly a stable approach - it's the only stability you'll find in this business
Benwa
Rank 8
Rank 8
Posts: 850
Joined: Sun Feb 15, 2004 8:28 pm
Location: CYQB

Re: 787 Pilots

Post by Benwa »

ahramin wrote: Thu Jun 20, 2019 4:49 pm That's funny Tango Niner since there is no requirement to tell Gander or Shanwick radio that you are CPDLC since they already know.

CPDLC isn't something that shows up on radar, it's something included in your flight plan.
Yet 2 days ago... Shanwick came back with Confirm CPDLC ? So l will go back to bug others and just keep telling Shanwick and Gander Oceanic on initial contact that I'm CPDLC.
---------- ADS -----------
 
--In his wrapup remarks, the FAA chief said, "If you think the safety bar is set too high, then your
standards are set too low."
plausiblyannonymous
Rank 4
Rank 4
Posts: 206
Joined: Thu Feb 07, 2019 12:35 pm

Re: 787 Pilots

Post by plausiblyannonymous »

Eric Janson wrote: Sun Jun 30, 2019 9:22 pm
Legacy wrote: Fri Jun 21, 2019 2:32 am You think we don't roll eyes at some Europeans? Especially when they have engine fires on take off on the West coast and still elect to continue to the UK. Actually, we don't roll our eyes, we usually just say WTF!!!!!!?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/British_A ... Flight_268

Engine was shut down after a surge. Not a fire.

There are no restrictions on 3 Engine flight with a 4 Engine aircraft - it's different than a twin. There is no requirement to land at the nearest suitable airport.

One variant of the Type I fly will actually fly further on 3 Engines. If you're not too heavy the aircraft will even maintain current altitude and speed.
IIRC, the calculations and restrictions are based on a one-engine out scenario. With a twin, you're losing half of your thrust, whereas with a quad, you're only losing a quarter.
---------- ADS -----------
 
Tango Niner
Rank 0
Rank 0
Posts: 12
Joined: Tue Apr 10, 2018 4:59 pm

Re: 787 Pilots

Post by Tango Niner »

Benwa wrote: Wed Jul 03, 2019 9:06 pm
ahramin wrote: Thu Jun 20, 2019 4:49 pm That's funny Tango Niner since there is no requirement to tell Gander or Shanwick radio that you are CPDLC since they already know.

CPDLC isn't something that shows up on radar, it's something included in your flight plan.
Yet 2 days ago... Shanwick came back with Confirm CPDLC ? So l will go back to bug others and just keep telling Shanwick and Gander Oceanic on initial contact that I'm CPDLC.
With you there Benwa. The first time I *didn't* say CPDLC to an oceanic guy, he wanted confirmation of same.
---------- ADS -----------
 
yycflyguy
Rank 10
Rank 10
Posts: 2766
Joined: Tue Feb 24, 2004 9:18 am

Re: 787 Pilots

Post by yycflyguy »

Sometimes it's just fun to mess with Gander... the grumpiest controllers on the face of the planet!
---------- ADS -----------
 
garfield
Rank 4
Rank 4
Posts: 290
Joined: Wed Jan 08, 2014 5:35 pm

Re: 787 Pilots

Post by garfield »

Do you do the grooming after a 787 flight?
---------- ADS -----------
 
Warden
Rank 3
Rank 3
Posts: 120
Joined: Tue Jun 04, 2019 10:08 pm

Re: 787 Pilots

Post by Warden »

Grooming is over. It's done. On all aircraft unless you're a minion koolaide drinker try hard.
---------- ADS -----------
 
Post Reply

Return to “WestJet”