Tories cloud transparency by thwarting laws

This forum is for non aviation related topics, political debate, random thoughts, and everything else that just doesn't seem to fit in the normal forums. ALL FORUM RULES STILL APPLY.

Moderators: sky's the limit, sepia, Sulako, lilfssister, North Shore

Locked
CD
Rank 10
Rank 10
Posts: 2731
Joined: Thu Feb 19, 2004 5:13 pm
Location: Canada

Tories cloud transparency by thwarting laws

Post by CD »

Tories cloud transparency by thwarting laws

THE HAMILTON SPECTATOR
James Travers- OPINION
December 13, 2007

No matter what he says today, Martin Brian Mulroney, Canada's 18th prime minister, can't change two realities. One is that the careful reconstruction of his reputation is in ruins, knocked flat by the wrecking ball of Karlheinz Schreiber's cash-stuffed envelopes. The other is that his government and its Liberal successor both failed the critical sniff test.

Those facts of almost current federal political life offer starkly contrasting insights into how this capital has, and has not, changed. Mercifully, electoral reform is dragging into the past the grasping Ottawa Mulroney comes here to explain today, the Ottawa of party bagmen and greasy contracts. Less happily, the accountability that decades ago should have made an open book of Air Canada's $1.8-billion Airbus purchase is as elusive and illusory as ever.

It's not just that the Conservative campaign commitment to shine daylight into dark corners is less than promised. It's also that liability is fluid, flowing from ministers to mandarins as the situation and politics demand.

Stephen Harper's decision to resume Chalk River medical isotope production is one of two current examples. In effectively taking the advice of operators over the regulator, the prime minister is weighing the small possibility of catastrophe against the larger interest of patients even as he gambles with public confidence in vital safeguards. What's troubling is politicians neutering a nuclear watchdog. What's marginally more reassuring is that there's no ambiguity: Harper is clearly accountable for a problematic policy option with potentially devastating political consequences.

As the buck-passing after the Vancouver airport Taser horror demonstrates, that's not standard Ottawa operating procedure. Turning the principle of ministerial accountability on its head, this government is keeping Public Safety Minister Stockwell Day out of the spotlight while pushing into it Alain Jolicouer, a theoretically nameless, faceless civil servant.

That's been an accelerating trend since the Mulroney years when a bureaucrat was publicly tarred for the 1991 comedy of errors that saw Mohammed al-Mashat, a Saddam Hussein apologist, leap the immigration queue. More than convenient for ministers, the practice of footloose blame adds to the mystery of where, if anywhere, the buck stops here. And that, of course, is not coincidental.

In resisting meaningful lobbying reform Conservatives are continuing the ruling party tradition of clouding transparency by thwarting, among other things, access to information laws. Add those obstructions to parliamentary committees that have lost the capacity and perhaps the will to protect the public purse and the ground is nicely prepped for scandal.

Mulroney administrations staggered from one embarrassment to another, contributing significantly to high public distrust and the prime minister's record low popularity. Jean Chr tien dipsy-doodled around his share, finally leaving behind the sponsorship mess that tripped Paul Martin.

Years later questions remain unanswered about tens of millions of dollars in Airbus commissions and the political direction of a scheme that benefited the Liberal party and its closest Quebec friends.

No question, the Ottawa Mulroney returns to today is in important ways a better place than it was when be got out of town just ahead of wrathful voters. But it's not consistently accountable and remains as opaque -- and with the same proximity to evil odours -- as a bathroom window.
---------- ADS -----------
 
User avatar
Dust Devil
Rank 11
Rank 11
Posts: 4027
Joined: Fri Jun 24, 2005 10:55 am
Location: Riderville

Post by Dust Devil »

did the opposition not support this? I heard that these backup pumps are meant to come into play in the event of a seismic catastrophe which could occur once every 50,000 years. Seems like a calculated risk to me.
---------- ADS -----------
 
Locked

Return to “The Water Cooler”