Porter and the CSeries

Discuss topics relating to airlines.

Moderators: sky's the limit, sepia, Sulako, North Shore

Splash
Rank 3
Rank 3
Posts: 138
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2013 5:23 pm

Porter and the CSeries

Post by Splash »

I don't know what to make of this news story other than to say it's a very risky move on the part of Porter.

http://business.financialpost.com/2013/ ... er-planes/
---------- ADS -----------
 
User avatar
confusedalot
Rank 8
Rank 8
Posts: 959
Joined: Fri Jul 03, 2009 9:08 pm
Location: location, location, is what matters

Re: Porter and the CSeries

Post by confusedalot »

wow.

Everything is possible. It will be interesting to see the political maneuvering surrounding the island airport thing, if that's the way they want to go that is.
---------- ADS -----------
 
User avatar
slowstream
Rank 7
Rank 7
Posts: 553
Joined: Sun Jun 06, 2004 9:15 am
Location: Canada

Re: Porter and the CSeries

Post by slowstream »

I don't know, they've built a growing customer base; this seems like a logical next step and growth.

Aside from that it will be great to see the first airline in Canada to bring on the new C series which I believe will be proven to be a very competitive a/c.
---------- ADS -----------
 
photofly
Top Poster
Top Poster
Posts: 11306
Joined: Tue Jan 18, 2011 4:47 pm
Location: Hangry and crankypated

Re: Porter and the CSeries

Post by photofly »

confusedalot wrote:wow.

Everything is possible. It will be interesting to see the political maneuvering surrounding the island airport thing, if that's the way they want to go that is.
But under the terms of Tripartite Agreement, the only jet aircraft traffic allowed at the Island airport is for MEDEVAC flights. Pamela McDonald, Toronto Port Authority spokeswoman, said those rules will remain in effect for the duration of the agreement and there are no plans to seek amendments at this time.
---------- ADS -----------
 
Splash
Rank 3
Rank 3
Posts: 138
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2013 5:23 pm

Re: Porter and the CSeries

Post by Splash »

photofly wrote:
confusedalot wrote:wow.

Everything is possible. It will be interesting to see the political maneuvering surrounding the island airport thing, if that's the way they want to go that is.
But under the terms of Tripartite Agreement, the only jet aircraft traffic allowed at the Island airport is for MEDEVAC flights. Pamela McDonald, Toronto Port Authority spokeswoman, said those rules will remain in effect for the duration of the agreement and there are no plans to seek amendments at this time.
We all know that politics makes for strange bedfellows.
---------- ADS -----------
 
justwork
Rank 6
Rank 6
Posts: 481
Joined: Thu Jan 06, 2011 7:59 am
Location: East Coast

Re: Porter and the CSeries

Post by justwork »

This is great news. Canadian company flying exclusively Canadian planes. I'm really curious to see the actual performance numbers of the CSeries and the new purepower engines. Go Bombardier and Go Porter.
---------- ADS -----------
 
countryhick
Rank 4
Rank 4
Posts: 248
Joined: Sun Sep 28, 2008 9:12 am
Location: Down in Butlertown

Re: Porter and the CSeries

Post by countryhick »

Have you heard of Jazz?

Good for Porter, hope it works for them!!
---------- ADS -----------
 
777LR
Rank 2
Rank 2
Posts: 66
Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2012 11:59 am

Re: Porter and the CSeries

Post by 777LR »

Hopefully the pay will come with it...
---------- ADS -----------
 
User avatar
Flywest
Rank 2
Rank 2
Posts: 82
Joined: Sun May 15, 2005 1:19 pm

Re: Porter and the CSeries

Post by Flywest »

I fear this may be a case of history repeating itself.

This reminds reminds me an awful lot of Wardair's expansion plans in the late '80s.

I hate to say it but, I think Bean's assessment of the situation over on the AEForum is unfortunately the most likely scenario.
---------- ADS -----------
 
User avatar
aileron
Rank 5
Rank 5
Posts: 394
Joined: Sun Feb 15, 2004 11:53 pm

Re: Porter and the CSeries

Post by aileron »

Flywest wrote:I fear this may be a case of history repeating itself.

This reminds reminds me an awful lot of Wardair's expansion plans in the late '80s.

I hate to say it but, I think Bean's assessment of the situation over on the AEForum is unfortunately the most likely scenario.
I would expect no less from TheBean, AKA Reality Chex...

8)
---------- ADS -----------
 
User avatar
Flywest
Rank 2
Rank 2
Posts: 82
Joined: Sun May 15, 2005 1:19 pm

Re: Porter and the CSeries

Post by Flywest »

Me neither, however; I think he's right.
---------- ADS -----------
 
wallypilot
Rank (9)
Rank (9)
Posts: 1645
Joined: Thu Mar 04, 2004 9:59 pm
Location: The Best Coast

Re: Porter and the CSeries

Post by wallypilot »

confusedalot wrote:wow.

Everything is possible. It will be interesting to see the political maneuvering surrounding the island airport thing, if that's the way they want to go that is.
what's the noise signature on something similar? if the pure power noise levels will be anything like modern bizjets, there shouldn't be much case to keep then new jets out of the island.
---------- ADS -----------
 
skyler
Rank 1
Rank 1
Posts: 30
Joined: Tue Nov 14, 2006 5:58 pm
Location: Toronto, Canada
Contact:

Re: Porter and the CSeries

Post by skyler »

The loudest on the Island is probably Ornge, followed by the Q. I think the definition of noise for Toronto Island residents depends on what they might need (medivac late at night), and everything else. Condo owners along the lake is another issue and seem to have more clout than island residents (boring airshows now), though employees that live there say the streetcars make more noise then aircraft landing at YTZ.

Besides military, not sure what the largest aircraft, or loudest, is to land on YTZ.
---------- ADS -----------
 
photofly
Top Poster
Top Poster
Posts: 11306
Joined: Tue Jan 18, 2011 4:47 pm
Location: Hangry and crankypated

Re: Porter and the CSeries

Post by photofly »

The loudest thing on the Island by a factor of several is Robert Deluce's own 185 on floats, and he well knows it. It's deafening, even from the mainland ferry dock.

http://www.wingsmagazine.com/content/view/5048/38/
Robert Deluce wrote:The Q400 is remarkably quiet – the little Cessna I occasionally fly from here is 10 times noisier.
.-up is the Piaggio Avanti.
---------- ADS -----------
 
skyler
Rank 1
Rank 1
Posts: 30
Joined: Tue Nov 14, 2006 5:58 pm
Location: Toronto, Canada
Contact:

Re: Porter and the CSeries

Post by skyler »

photofly wrote:The loudest thing on the Island by a factor of several is Robert Deluce's own 185 on floats, and he well knows it. It's deafening, even from the mainland ferry dock.

http://www.wingsmagazine.com/content/view/5048/38/
Robert Deluce wrote:The Q400 is remarkably quiet – the little Cessna I occasionally fly from here is 10 times noisier.
.-up is the Piaggio Avanti.
The Piaggio is loud, but there is another that is worse. Not sure what aircraft but it reminds me of an A7 (for us military types) with props...a vacuum cleaner on steroids. A regular at the Island and just painful even with the ear protectors.

The medivac jet is barely noticed, unless we happen to actually see it.
---------- ADS -----------
 
User avatar
cdnpilot77
Rank 10
Rank 10
Posts: 2467
Joined: Thu Jun 11, 2009 6:24 pm

Re: Porter and the CSeries

Post by cdnpilot77 »

skyler wrote:
photofly wrote:The loudest thing on the Island by a factor of several is Robert Deluce's own 185 on floats, and he well knows it. It's deafening, even from the mainland ferry dock.

http://www.wingsmagazine.com/content/view/5048/38/
Robert Deluce wrote:The Q400 is remarkably quiet – the little Cessna I occasionally fly from here is 10 times noisier.
.-up is the Piaggio Avanti.
The Piaggio is loud, but there is another that is worse. Not sure what aircraft but it reminds me of an A7 (for us military types) with props...a vacuum cleaner on steroids. A regular at the Island and just painful even with the ear protectors.

The medivac jet is barely noticed, unless we happen to actually see it.
MU-2?
---------- ADS -----------
 
photofly
Top Poster
Top Poster
Posts: 11306
Joined: Tue Jan 18, 2011 4:47 pm
Location: Hangry and crankypated

Re: Porter and the CSeries

Post by photofly »

I think it might be.
---------- ADS -----------
 
skyler
Rank 1
Rank 1
Posts: 30
Joined: Tue Nov 14, 2006 5:58 pm
Location: Toronto, Canada
Contact:

Re: Porter and the CSeries

Post by skyler »

Thank you yes...the MU-2. GA is not my strong point. I work Ramp not FBO.
---------- ADS -----------
 
User avatar
Takeoff OK
Rank 4
Rank 4
Posts: 268
Joined: Wed Jun 09, 2010 12:21 am

Re: Porter and the CSeries

Post by Takeoff OK »

Don't see how this is possible at YTZ.

The Landing Distance req'd at MLW is quoted at 4400'. Add to that the 60% factor and you're looking at 7333'. Throw some rain on there and you're now looking at 8433' to be legal to dispatch to the island.

This is a publicity stunt.

Or, they have no intention of operating them in/out of YTZ.
---------- ADS -----------
 
Morav
Rank 4
Rank 4
Posts: 209
Joined: Mon Jan 15, 2007 12:19 pm
Location: earth

Re: Porter and the CSeries

Post by Morav »

Takeoff OK wrote:Don't see how this is possible at YTZ.

The Landing Distance req'd at MLW is quoted at 4400'. Add to that the 60% factor and you're looking at 7333'. Throw some rain on there and you're now looking at 8433' to be legal to dispatch to the island.

This is a publicity stunt.

Or, they have no intention of operating them in/out of YTZ.
FYI, it's fine so long as your alternate airport meets the dispatch factored landing distance requirments.
---------- ADS -----------
 
Post Reply

Return to “General Airline Industry Comments”