weather network vs Environment Canada
Moderators: lilfssister, North Shore, sky's the limit, sepia, Sulako, I WAS Birddog
-
ragbagflyer
- Rank 7

- Posts: 719
- Joined: Wed Feb 01, 2006 10:45 pm
- Location: Somewhere rocky or salty.
weather network vs Environment Canada
Does anybody know what accounts for the huge discrepancy between forecasts from these two forecast providers. The two five day forecasts for Whitehorse don't even remotely resemble one another. I assume they use the same satellite data in forecasting, and I know both of them take current observations from the Whitehorse airport. They might as well just say that the sun will rise and set on a given day and let the rest just happen.
Re: weather network vs Environment Canada
ragbagflyer wrote:
Does anybody know what accounts for the huge discrepancy between forecasts from these two forecast providers
I have a theory, it's called the "Rotating Dartboard Theory". They place "weather" segements on the wheel and spin it. Next they get a blindfolded person to throw a dart at this board. Wherever it hits is the weather forecast .... so if you see snow in July, you'll know why.
On another note, looking at these sites daily, I've come up with the conception that the Weather Network is usually the "optomistic" version while EC is often the "pessimistic" one. Now couple those two with Nav Canada's AWWS and finally decide for yourself which one is the most likely. As for the discrepancies, remember it's a forecast, it's an interpretation and prediction of what is likely to happen based on data available to the forecaster .... no one can call it 100% right of the time
Last edited by Grey_Wolf on Tue Dec 11, 2007 7:33 pm, edited 1 time in total.
"A good traveller has no fixed plan and is not intent on arriving." -Lao Tzu
-
freakonature
- Rank 5

- Posts: 310
- Joined: Sat Jun 16, 2007 9:36 pm
-
freakonature
- Rank 5

- Posts: 310
- Joined: Sat Jun 16, 2007 9:36 pm
Both use computer model data from more than one source. These models can often differ greatly and depending on how much (or how little) human input is used to tweak this data, a forecast can be produced that will prove in hindsight to be wildly inaccurate. The Weather Network's 14 day trend springs to mind. Its usefulness ends at letting you know what the date will be in 14 days.
Weather forecasting is very difficult (my better half worked in the UK Met Office for 15 years) but is there really a need to produce a 14 day forecast which you know is going to be 10% accurate at best? Concentrate on 2-3 days where your accuracy will be much higher and you'll gain a little respect from your customers.
My $0.02
Weather forecasting is very difficult (my better half worked in the UK Met Office for 15 years) but is there really a need to produce a 14 day forecast which you know is going to be 10% accurate at best? Concentrate on 2-3 days where your accuracy will be much higher and you'll gain a little respect from your customers.
My $0.02
Spot on.cossack wrote:Both use computer model data from more than one source. These models can often differ greatly and depending on how much (or how little) human input is used to tweak this data, a forecast can be produced that will prove in hindsight to be wildly inaccurate. The Weather Network's 14 day trend springs to mind. Its usefulness ends at letting you know what the date will be in 14 days.
Weather forecasting is very difficult (my better half worked in the UK Met Office for 15 years) but is there really a need to produce a 14 day forecast which you know is going to be 10% accurate at best? Concentrate on 2-3 days where your accuracy will be much higher and you'll gain a little respect from your customers.
My $0.02
Exactly. Some forecasts lean heavily towards one model over another...and some models depict certain variables better than others. So on any given day one model's guidance can lead you astray for a different set of reasons. The data is the same, the way it is interpolated and processed is different.
I remember MeteoMedia (Weather Channel's French language counterpart) stating they used data from EC but made their own forecasts.
The TAFs are afaik made by Environment Canada.
One piece of advice I've given is to keep a very close eye on the weather if there's a disagreement between EC's 5 day forecasts and the TAF.
Goodbye,
Louis
The TAFs are afaik made by Environment Canada.
One piece of advice I've given is to keep a very close eye on the weather if there's a disagreement between EC's 5 day forecasts and the TAF.
Goodbye,
Louis
Ask the old fella that's been flying out of the airport for 30 years. He'll tell you what day to plan your cross-country.
"FLY THE AIRPLANE"!
http://www.youtube.com/hazatude
http://www.youtube.com/hazatude




