"opting out" an expensive option

This forum has been developed to discuss aviation related topics.

Moderators: Sulako, lilfssister, North Shore, sky's the limit, sepia, I WAS Birddog

grimey
Rank 10
Rank 10
Posts: 2979
Joined: Fri Mar 11, 2005 1:01 am
Location: somewhere drunk

Re: "opting out" an expensive option

Post by grimey »

niss wrote: That's true if you are flying TO israel on El Al but if you want to access the ticket counter for any airline out of Ben Gurion you get the same treatment. Everyone flying out of Israel gets the same security.
And how many guards do they have doing the interviews? We can't get qualified people to run an x-ray scanner, we're not going to find tens of thousands of guys to ask the same sorts of profiling questions over and over, with the knowledge and skills to do so intelligently. Israel can because they are (correctly) insanely paranoid about attacks against them, and so there's a motivation, and there's a large amount of pride in who they are, so there's a great deal of knowledge about their country. Israeli citizens see their security as a valuable public service. We see ours as a nuisance.

We can certainly take some things away from their security model, but implementing it completely just isn't an option.
---------- ADS -----------
 
no sig because apparently quoting people in context is offensive to them.
ogc
Rank 5
Rank 5
Posts: 317
Joined: Tue Sep 15, 2009 11:52 am

Re: "opting out" an expensive option

Post by ogc »

istp wrote:Or another option is to just go back to pre-9/11 level security.

There were a few hijackings where people died, sure, but statistically it was safer than driving and you'd have a better chance of winning the 6/49 than getting killed by a terrorist.

How quickly we forget the good old days of freedom.

-istp :roll:
Another interesting statistic is the increase in traffic deaths in the year following 9/11.

The way the researchers put it, a lot of people elected to drive instead of fly and as a result fatal traffic collisions increased by some 1600 people between 09/2001 and 09/2002. About half the amount that was actually killed in the 9/11 attack.

The odds are actually astounding, for example, even if a plane was hijacked once a week for a year, and you traveled by air, once a month for that year the odds are still 1 in 135,000.

Compared to 1 in 6000 for driving.
---------- ADS -----------
 
Changes in Latitudes
Rank 10
Rank 10
Posts: 2396
Joined: Sat Jan 26, 2008 8:47 am
Location: The weather is here, I wish you were beautiful.

Re: "opting out" an expensive option

Post by Changes in Latitudes »

"Awww cripes, just take it"

Image
---------- ADS -----------
 
Changes in Latitudes
Rank 10
Rank 10
Posts: 2396
Joined: Sat Jan 26, 2008 8:47 am
Location: The weather is here, I wish you were beautiful.

Re: "opting out" an expensive option

Post by Changes in Latitudes »

The nice part is, they'll sign off your CAT 1 medical on your way through!!
Image
---------- ADS -----------
 
Spokes
Rank (9)
Rank (9)
Posts: 1057
Joined: Mon Apr 17, 2006 9:22 pm
Location: Toronto, On

Re: "opting out" an expensive option

Post by Spokes »

grimey wrote:
niss wrote: That's true if you are flying TO israel on El Al but if you want to access the ticket counter for any airline out of Ben Gurion you get the same treatment. Everyone flying out of Israel gets the same security.
And how many guards do they have doing the interviews? We can't get qualified people to run an x-ray scanner, we're not going to find tens of thousands of guys to ask the same sorts of profiling questions over and over, with the knowledge and skills to do so intelligently. Israel can because they are (correctly) insanely paranoid about attacks against them, and so there's a motivation, and there's a large amount of pride in who they are, so there's a great deal of knowledge about their country. Israeli citizens see their security as a valuable public service. We see ours as a nuisance.

We can certainly take some things away from their security model, but implementing it completely just isn't an option.
So, just flew out of Ben G a couple weeks ago on Lufthanasa. Here is the drill.

First: no everyone does not get the same treatment. There was one gentleman who's discussion I overheard a bit. He was from the west bank area, and had considerable more security procedures to endure.

As for me, besides taking a long time (and being a bit sick at the time) it was pretty straight forward.

1. Security started outside the terminal. We passed through a checkpoint in the rental car. 2 or 3 guys there with M16's (or some such thing). A quick glance inside the car, and they waved us through.
2. Inside the terminal, find Lufthansa get in line to xray luggage. This was a crazy slow line. It seemed to take forever. While in this line, a young lady in a security uniform interviews passengers. Business or please? Business. What business? Training IAI. Do you have a formal invitation? yes- here. After a short consultation with a co-worker? supervisor? everything is in order. Then: Passport? Here. Thankyou- next.
3. X-ray luggage. Finally. On bag does not look so good- go to another desk. Young uniformed lady at this desk looked at x-ray. Do you have any Dead Sea products? Yes. Did you buy them, or are they a gift? I bought them. Ok, go ahead.
4. Check in at lufthansa. Bags gone boarding pass in hand.
5. Personal screening next. x-ray carry on, take out laptop etc. No grope. No naked xray machine. Also no taking off steel toed boots. You simply stand on a little machine with foot outlines. Light is green- go ahead. Done. very painless
6. Passport control. short line, show passport. passport stamped next. no fuss at all.
7. one last checkpoint- a bit of a bottleneck exit to ensure passport is stamped with an exiting stamp. then at the gate.

Done- through. I am told there are plenty of plain cloths security types wandering about, but I could not pick them out. No reason to think I could I suppose. They seemed (to me) to rely more on passenger profiling than technological gizmo's. I certainly did like not having to take off work boots for a change. They seem to have mastered this security thing with pissing a lot of people off. At least for an operation of their size.
---------- ADS -----------
 
Wahunga!
User avatar
AirFrame
Rank 10
Rank 10
Posts: 2610
Joined: Sun Oct 11, 2009 10:27 pm
Location: Sidney, BC
Contact:

Re: "opting out" an expensive option

Post by AirFrame »

grimey wrote:And how many guards do they have doing the interviews? We can't get qualified people to run an x-ray scanner, we're not going to find tens of thousands of guys to ask the same sorts of profiling questions over and over, with the knowledge and skills to do so intelligently.
I guess you haven't seen YVR's customs and immigration lineup after a flight lands from HKG. Everyone gets a brief interview. No reason it couldn't happen on the way in, too.
---------- ADS -----------
 
grimey
Rank 10
Rank 10
Posts: 2979
Joined: Fri Mar 11, 2005 1:01 am
Location: somewhere drunk

Re: "opting out" an expensive option

Post by grimey »

AirFrame wrote:
grimey wrote:And how many guards do they have doing the interviews? We can't get qualified people to run an x-ray scanner, we're not going to find tens of thousands of guys to ask the same sorts of profiling questions over and over, with the knowledge and skills to do so intelligently.
I guess you haven't seen YVR's customs and immigration lineup after a flight lands from HKG. Everyone gets a brief interview. No reason it couldn't happen on the way in, too.
So flights into one airport, from one destination. How does this indicate that you have enough staff to do it on all outbound flights, to all destinations? Keep in mind that you still need to staff inbound customs.
---------- ADS -----------
 
no sig because apparently quoting people in context is offensive to them.
User avatar
V1 Rotate
Rank 5
Rank 5
Posts: 377
Joined: Sat Oct 01, 2005 9:01 pm
Location: Fragrant Harbour

Re: "opting out" an expensive option

Post by V1 Rotate »

A little more fuel for the fire:


http://www.dailymail.co.uk/travel/artic ... ds-newsxml

FML
---------- ADS -----------
 
"I have control!"
Post Reply

Return to “General Comments”