No Commercial Single Engine Ops
Moderators: sky's the limit, sepia, Sulako, lilfssister, North Shore, I WAS Birddog
No Commercial Single Engine Ops
Sailed to Union Island in the Grenadines a couple of weeks ago. Had to walk to the airport to clear in. This sign was posted in the terminal.
Single Engine not approved for Commercial Carriers.
Single Engine not approved for Commercial Carriers.
- Attachments
-
- 20150909_090134.jpg (592.74 KiB) Viewed 2435 times
Re: No Commercial Single Engine Ops
The wording makes it sound like an attempt to educate the flying public to not fall for paying for dodgy chisel charter flights.
-
- Rank 7
- Posts: 505
- Joined: Wed Sep 23, 2015 8:28 pm
- Location: YKF
Re: No Commercial Single Engine Ops
What's wrong with chartering something like a PC-12?GyvAir wrote:The wording makes it sound like an attempt to educate the flying public to not fall for paying for dodgy chisel charter flights.
Re: No Commercial Single Engine Ops
Nothing wrong with chartering a PC-12, providing that it is commercially operated in accordance with local regulations.Cessna 180 wrote:What's wrong with chartering something like a PC-12?GyvAir wrote:The wording makes it sound like an attempt to educate the flying public to not fall for paying for dodgy chisel charter flights.
"Chisel charter" refers to operating a non-commercially registered and maintained aircraft in a commerical manner. Doing so bypasses all the checks and balances in place that commerial operators have to abide by to ensure a standard of safety is maintained - along with the related expenses. Hence, the undercutting 'chisel' label.
- Redneck_pilot86
- Rank (9)
- Posts: 1329
- Joined: Tue Feb 15, 2005 12:47 pm
- Location: between 60 and 70
Re: No Commercial Single Engine Ops
I could be off base here, but isn't an ops spec required to carry passengers SE in Canada? That would mean that it is essentially illegal to operate a commercial passenger service in a single engine airplane, without having the exemption in place.
The only three things a wingman should ever say: 1. "Two's up" 2. "You're on fire" 3. "I'll take the fat one"
Re: No Commercial Single Engine Ops
No. You need an OC to operate a commercial air service. But day VFR air taxi service in piston singles isn't unusual. And all flight training units can carry out sightseeing flights, again day VFR.
Single engine IFR operations is limited in practice to aircraft with a PT-6 turbine engine, because those are the only ones with a sufficiently high MTBF.
Single engine IFR operations is limited in practice to aircraft with a PT-6 turbine engine, because those are the only ones with a sufficiently high MTBF.
DId you hear the one about the jurisprudence fetishist? He got off on a technicality.
- Redneck_pilot86
- Rank (9)
- Posts: 1329
- Joined: Tue Feb 15, 2005 12:47 pm
- Location: between 60 and 70
Re: No Commercial Single Engine Ops
Just had a look, the ops spec (040) that I was thinking of only concerns passengers on board during aerial work (CAR 702.16)photofly wrote:No. You need an OC to operate a commercial air service. But day VFR air taxi service in piston singles isn't unusual. And all flight training units can carry out sightseeing flights, again day VFR.
Single engine IFR operations is limited in practice to aircraft with a PT-6 turbine engine, because those are the only ones with a sufficiently high MTBF.
So commercial ops from a to b are fine, but sightseeing, patrol, etc does not allow passengers on board without the ops spec in place.
The only three things a wingman should ever say: 1. "Two's up" 2. "You're on fire" 3. "I'll take the fat one"
-
- Rank (9)
- Posts: 1645
- Joined: Thu Mar 04, 2004 9:59 pm
- Location: The Best Coast
Re: No Commercial Single Engine Ops
Lots of countries prohibit se commercial ops. Some also prohibit night VFR.
Re: No Commercial Single Engine Ops
GyvAir wrote:"Chisel charter" refers to operating a non-commercially registered and maintained aircraft in a commerical manner. Doing so bypasses all the checks and balances in place that commerial operators have to abide by to ensure a standard of safety is maintained - along with the related expenses. Hence, the undercutting 'chisel' label.
Kinda like Uber?
Re: No Commercial Single Engine Ops
https://www.skyuber.comDonald wrote:GyvAir wrote:"Chisel charter" refers to operating a non-commercially registered and maintained aircraft in a commerical manner. Doing so bypasses all the checks and balances in place that commerial operators have to abide by to ensure a standard of safety is maintained - along with the related expenses. Hence, the undercutting 'chisel' label.
Kinda like Uber?
Just googled it up for the fun of it... Seems someone has come up with that idea.
As Wallypilot said...
Single Engine commercial ops is not approved in all countries..
-
- Rank 11
- Posts: 4581
- Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2004 2:33 am
- Location: YYC 230 degree radial at about 10 DME
Re: No Commercial Single Engine Ops
So a nation of islands, prohibits commercial single engined float planes? a Twin otter only country? Seems counter intuitive no?