Interesting Article on Bombardier and the CSeries

This forum has been developed to discuss aviation related topics.

Moderators: sky's the limit, sepia, Sulako, lilfssister, North Shore, I WAS Birddog

Post Reply
User avatar
jpilot77
Rank 7
Rank 7
Posts: 684
Joined: Sun Aug 03, 2008 5:11 pm
Location: North of YMX

Interesting Article on Bombardier and the CSeries

Post by jpilot77 »

Pretty good read. The URL feature isn't working at the moment though.

http://business.financialpost.com/news/ ... ries-dream
---------- ADS -----------
 
Welcome to Redneck Airlines. We might not get you there but we'll get you close!
North Shore
Rank Moderator
Rank Moderator
Posts: 5602
Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2004 3:47 pm
Location: Straight outta Dundarave...

Re: Interesting Article on Bombardier and the CSeries

Post by North Shore »

Theres a bit at the end about a replacement for the Aurora...is this even being talked about? Those in the know (Spokes, Rockie, Aux Bat, Big Pistons...) is the C100 a fit for the job?
---------- ADS -----------
 
Say, what's that mountain goat doing up here in the mist?
Happiness is V1 at Thompson!
Ass, Licence, Job. In that order.
ScudRunner
Rank 11
Rank 11
Posts: 3239
Joined: Tue Jun 08, 2004 11:58 am

Re: Interesting Article on Bombardier and the CSeries

Post by ScudRunner »

Well I heard they where looking at the P-8 Poseidon (Boeing 737) C-Series might be a nice made in Canada solution and a way the Liberals can funnel more cash to friends and family in Quebec.
---------- ADS -----------
 
North Shore
Rank Moderator
Rank Moderator
Posts: 5602
Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2004 3:47 pm
Location: Straight outta Dundarave...

Re: Interesting Article on Bombardier and the CSeries

Post by North Shore »

Well, assuming the product is of similar quality, I'd rather see my tax money stay within the country than go to strangers without....but doubtless some politician somewhere will get a new deck out of the deal, and has already signed a 'free trade' agreement saying that we cant be biased towards Canadian companies :roll:
---------- ADS -----------
 
Say, what's that mountain goat doing up here in the mist?
Happiness is V1 at Thompson!
Ass, Licence, Job. In that order.
Rockie
Top Poster
Top Poster
Posts: 8433
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 7:10 am

Re: Interesting Article on Bombardier and the CSeries

Post by Rockie »

No clue. But the P-8 itself seems to me to be a misuse. Jets, even turbofans are not as efficient as turboprops at low altitude which translates into time on station. For a tactical jet that's a factor but not as much as raw power, speed and maneuverability. In an ASW platform it's a major consideration.

Just my uninformed opinion though.

Note: Oldtimers used to tell me the old Argus used to take off out of Greenwood for Portugal - and could hold Greenwood as the alternate. Now that's endurance...
---------- ADS -----------
 
fish4life
Rank 10
Rank 10
Posts: 2414
Joined: Sun Jun 27, 2010 6:32 am

Re: Interesting Article on Bombardier and the CSeries

Post by fish4life »

Q400 or ATR 72 would probably do the trick nicely.
---------- ADS -----------
 
Mach1
Rank 7
Rank 7
Posts: 719
Joined: Wed Mar 03, 2004 9:04 am

Re: Interesting Article on Bombardier and the CSeries

Post by Mach1 »

fish4life wrote:Q400 or ATR 72 would probably do the trick nicely.
Are you joking? Only 2 engines over the frigid waters of northern Canada? Unacceptable. We need new Aurora's. That way we save on the training since the pilots and crews are already trained on Aurora's and, it's a type we already know for maintenance and munitions loads.

Seriously. You can't have 2 engines over Canada, the country is huge and cold. :smt040

I may have been exposed to the F-35 thread one (or more) times too many. I will now try to remove my tongue from my cheek.
---------- ADS -----------
 
I'm going to knock this up a notch with my spice weasle. Bam!
watermeth
Rank 4
Rank 4
Posts: 204
Joined: Tue Nov 01, 2011 3:32 pm

Re: Interesting Article on Bombardier and the CSeries

Post by watermeth »

Chairman beaudouin is said to resign.
---------- ADS -----------
 
Post Reply

Return to “General Comments”