American Airlines pilot arrested in Detroit

This forum has been developed to discuss aviation related topics.

Moderators: sky's the limit, sepia, Sulako, lilfssister, North Shore, I WAS Birddog

Post Reply
atphat
Rank 6
Rank 6
Posts: 462
Joined: Wed Feb 11, 2009 8:01 pm

American Airlines pilot arrested in Detroit

Post by atphat »

http://abcnews.go.com/US/american-airli ... d=37949289

Hope the link works.
Most surprisingly of all the FAA limit is 0.04?
Be careful on those layovers boys and girls.
---------- ADS -----------
 
comanchepilot
Rank 3
Rank 3
Posts: 111
Joined: Mon Mar 26, 2007 6:49 pm
Location: Ontario

Re: American Airlines pilot arrested in Detroit

Post by comanchepilot »

0.08 here isn't it? (of course respecting 8 hours, and "under the influence" clauses)
---------- ADS -----------
 
Retractable pilots do it with their gear up!
200hr Wonder
Rank 10
Rank 10
Posts: 2212
Joined: Tue Apr 26, 2005 1:52 pm
Location: CYVR
Contact:

Re: American Airlines pilot arrested in Detroit

Post by 200hr Wonder »

Not sure what the "limit" is here as there can be some BAC due to normal metabolic processes. If I recall the EU under JAA is 0.02 or so. The idea being you are sober, this is of course the point.

Also why many airlines WJ and AC for example have company policies of greater than 8 hours bottle to throttle.
---------- ADS -----------
 
Cheers,

200hr Wonder
User avatar
Nark
Rank 10
Rank 10
Posts: 2967
Joined: Thu Feb 19, 2004 6:59 pm
Location: LA

Re: American Airlines pilot arrested in Detroit

Post by Nark »

Most 121 carriers have a company imposed BAC of 0.02 and a 12 hour bottle to throttle limit.
The FAA inspectors for each airline, signed off on it, thus making it the law of the respective company land.

The irony of an AA pilot getting busted is thick...
---------- ADS -----------
 
Qui desiderat pacem, praeparet bellum
Semper Fidelis
“De inimico non loquaris male, sed cogites"-
Do not wish death for your enemy, plan it.
nbinont
Rank 3
Rank 3
Posts: 157
Joined: Wed Apr 25, 2012 6:54 pm

Re: American Airlines pilot arrested in Detroit

Post by nbinont »

CAR 602.03 No person shall act as a crew member of an aircraft
(a) within eight hours after consuming an alcoholic beverage;
(b) while under the influence of alcohol; or
(c) while using any drug that impairs the person’s faculties to the extent that the safety of the aircraft or of persons on board the aircraft is endangered in any way.

No explicit BAC limit for "under the influence" here in Canada - this can be interpreted strictly when a pilot appears to be under the influence: https://www.tc.gc.ca/eng/civilaviation/ ... 1-2911.htm
---------- ADS -----------
 
AvExpress
Rank 1
Rank 1
Posts: 42
Joined: Tue Oct 13, 2015 7:53 am

Re: American Airlines pilot arrested in Detroit

Post by AvExpress »

Nark wrote:Most 121 carriers have a company imposed BAC of 0.02 and a 12 hour bottle to throttle limit.
The FAA inspectors for each airline, signed off on it, thus making it the law of the respective company land.

The irony of an AA pilot getting busted is thick...

The irony is that fatigue is apparently ok. As we know fatigue has similar effects as being drunk (I forget off hand the numbers for say a full duty day). And there's been way more crashes due to fatigue. What I'm saying is it's a sin to have a BAC, and it's time TC and operators get off their arse and handle the next biggest sin and stop dragging the new duty rules.
---------- ADS -----------
 
stef
Rank 5
Rank 5
Posts: 316
Joined: Thu Mar 03, 2005 9:10 pm

Re: American Airlines pilot arrested in Detroit

Post by stef »

Interesting study I heard about recently measured simulator performance of pilots drunk vs hungover. Drunk pilots performed better. Something to consider for the young and dumb.
---------- ADS -----------
 
Cessna 180
Rank 7
Rank 7
Posts: 505
Joined: Wed Sep 23, 2015 8:28 pm
Location: YKF

Re: American Airlines pilot arrested in Detroit

Post by Cessna 180 »

nbinont wrote:CAR 602.03 No person shall act as a crew member of an aircraft
(a) within eight hours after consuming an alcoholic beverage;
(b) while under the influence of alcohol; or
(c) while using any drug that impairs the person’s faculties to the extent that the safety of the aircraft or of persons on board the aircraft is endangered in any way.

No explicit BAC limit for "under the influence" here in Canada - this can be interpreted strictly when a pilot appears to be under the influence: https://www.tc.gc.ca/eng/civilaviation/ ... 1-2911.htm
But the Criminal Code prohibits alcohol over .08.
253 (1) Every one commits an offence who operates a motor vehicle or vessel or operates or assists in the operation of an aircraft or of railway equipment or has the care or control of a motor vehicle, vessel, aircraft or railway equipment, whether it is in motion or not,

(a) while the person’s ability to operate the vehicle, vessel, aircraft or railway equipment is impaired by alcohol or a drug; or

(b) having consumed alcohol in such a quantity that the concentration in the person’s blood exceeds eighty milligrams of alcohol in one hundred millilitres of blood.

Marginal note:For greater certainty

(2) For greater certainty, the reference to impairment by alcohol or a drug in paragraph (1)(a) includes impairment by a combination of alcohol and a drug.
---------- ADS -----------
 
User avatar
Nark
Rank 10
Rank 10
Posts: 2967
Joined: Thu Feb 19, 2004 6:59 pm
Location: LA

Re: American Airlines pilot arrested in Detroit

Post by Nark »

AvExpress wrote:
Nark wrote:Most 121 carriers have a company imposed BAC of 0.02 and a 12 hour bottle to throttle limit.
The FAA inspectors for each airline, signed off on it, thus making it the law of the respective company land.

The irony of an AA pilot getting busted is thick...

The irony is that fatigue is apparently ok. As we know fatigue has similar effects as being drunk (I forget off hand the numbers for say a full duty day). And there's been way more crashes due to fatigue. What I'm saying is it's a sin to have a BAC, and it's time TC and operators get off their arse and handle the next biggest sin and stop dragging the new duty rules.
Sadly it took the death of 50 people in Buffalo to get action, regarding fatigue -flight/Duty time.
However it only counts if you fly passengers. The cargo guys don't have the same rules as us. (Fedex, UPS etc...)
---------- ADS -----------
 
Qui desiderat pacem, praeparet bellum
Semper Fidelis
“De inimico non loquaris male, sed cogites"-
Do not wish death for your enemy, plan it.
bobcaygeon
Rank 7
Rank 7
Posts: 683
Joined: Sat Mar 12, 2005 8:03 am

Re: American Airlines pilot arrested in Detroit

Post by bobcaygeon »

Nark wrote:
AvExpress wrote:
Nark wrote:Most 121 carriers have a company imposed BAC of 0.02 and a 12 hour bottle to throttle limit.
The FAA inspectors for each airline, signed off on it, thus making it the law of the respective company land.

The irony of an AA pilot getting busted is thick...

The irony is that fatigue is apparently ok. As we know fatigue has similar effects as being drunk (I forget off hand the numbers for say a full duty day). And there's been way more crashes due to fatigue. What I'm saying is it's a sin to have a BAC, and it's time TC and operators get off their arse and handle the next biggest sin and stop dragging the new duty rules.
Sadly it took the death of 50 people in Buffalo to get action, regarding fatigue -flight/Duty time.
However it only counts if you fly passengers. The cargo guys don't have the same rules as us. (Fedex, UPS etc...)
Buffalo could still happen today with new regs as the crew chose to report fatigued because they commuted/slept in the crew room prior to check in. It still happens here in Canada. Company policies can only minimize this risk on company premises/aircraft.
---------- ADS -----------
 
User avatar
Nark
Rank 10
Rank 10
Posts: 2967
Joined: Thu Feb 19, 2004 6:59 pm
Location: LA

Re: American Airlines pilot arrested in Detroit

Post by Nark »

Yes, point being though, the regs changed as a direct result of that crash.
Nevermind crews and medical studies for years saying fatigue is bad.

The shitty thing is the cargo guys, who could just as easily kill people on the ground (UPS in Birmingham comes to mind). But because it's just the pilots on board, no one in Congress cares. (Enough to pressure the FAA to include cargo dudes)
---------- ADS -----------
 
Qui desiderat pacem, praeparet bellum
Semper Fidelis
“De inimico non loquaris male, sed cogites"-
Do not wish death for your enemy, plan it.
Post Reply

Return to “General Comments”