Low Px altitude correction on Appraoch

This forum has been developed to discuss aviation related topics.

Moderators: sky's the limit, sepia, Sulako, lilfssister, North Shore, I WAS Birddog

Post Reply
FOD_Vacuum
Rank 4
Rank 4
Posts: 294
Joined: Wed Oct 02, 2013 8:54 am

Low Px altitude correction on Appraoch

Post by FOD_Vacuum »

Just want some input on a dead end we have about this topic. It is not every day that you get unusually low pressure (below 29.00') but as some of you in Manitoba may have experienced yesterday, our pressure was fairly "low being in the high 28.xx" being the lowest we had all night.

When I asked my copilot if he knew anything about the altitude correction formula in extreme low px setting, he gave me a blank look and said he had never heard of it. I do remember seeing this somewhere that if the px is below 29.00 or 28.00, I can't remember which one, it is advisable to add 10 feet to your DH or MDA for every .01' below that value. I think I saw it in a book but can't remembr which one as it was many years ago.

Does anyone know if this is an actual thing? Thanks!

(Edited 28.10 to high 28.xx**)
---------- ADS -----------
 
Last edited by FOD_Vacuum on Sun Oct 08, 2017 4:09 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Sidebar
Rank 7
Rank 7
Posts: 521
Joined: Sat May 09, 2009 4:26 pm
Location: Winterpeg

Re: Low Px altitude correction on Appraoch

Post by Sidebar »

I think I saw in a book that if you can't set the altimeter, you shouldn't be flying an approach.
---------- ADS -----------
 
photofly
Top Poster
Top Poster
Posts: 11306
Joined: Tue Jan 18, 2011 4:47 pm
Location: Hangry and crankypated

Re: Low Px altitude correction on Appraoch

Post by photofly »

Which airport in Manitoba, yesterday?

As long as you can set the correct altimeter setting you shouldn't have to adjust any heights because of pressure. (That's what the altimeter setting does). Altimeters are usually adjustable down to 28.00". CAR571 Appendix B suggests altimeters have to be tested on a setting of 28.10".

More in this thread:
viewtopic.php?t=68591

AIP CANADA (ICAO) ENR has a section on operations where the altimeter setting exceeds 31.00" but it's silent about settings below 28.00".
https://www.navcanada.ca/EN/products-an ... nr_eng.pdf
---------- ADS -----------
 
DId you hear the one about the jurisprudence fetishist? He got off on a technicality.
Ki-ll
Rank 4
Rank 4
Posts: 290
Joined: Tue Oct 02, 2007 12:16 pm

Re: Low Px altitude correction on Appraoch

Post by Ki-ll »

There is guidance in CAP Gen for operations when altimeter setting is above 31.00, but not when below 28.00.
---------- ADS -----------
 
User avatar
confusedalot
Rank 8
Rank 8
Posts: 959
Joined: Fri Jul 03, 2009 9:08 pm
Location: location, location, is what matters

Re: Low Px altitude correction on Appraoch

Post by confusedalot »

Count me in as one who has never thought about correcting DA or MDA for a low altimeter setting. (after 39 years)

However, I suppose that it could be easily done on a circular CR-3 or CR-5 slide rule by doing the true altitude determination. That is, if anybody on this board actually remembers the jepp circular slide rule :lol:

Suspect that the true versus indicated altitude difference would be negligible.
---------- ADS -----------
 
Attempting to understand the world. I have not succeeded.

veni, vidi,...... vici non fecit.

:?
User avatar
oldtimer
Rank 10
Rank 10
Posts: 2296
Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2004 7:04 pm
Location: Calgary

Re: Low Px altitude correction on Appraoch

Post by oldtimer »

Having been in both situations where the altimeter setting is below 29.00 and again when it was above 31.xx, there is no adjustment to the MDA/DH required. If the setting is at 28.99 or lower but within the range of their instruments, ATC/FSS will say the altimeter setting twice. If you can set it, you can use it. If the altimeter setting is far enough above 31.xx and the setting is greater than what FSS's Kollsman altimeter can indicate and therefore FSS cannot accurately read the altimeter setting, the procedures to be used are in the CAP Gen as someone noted. Basically standard altimeter setting is used for cruise and an ILS approach may be required for approach and landing. When it happened to me many years ago, ATC could not get an accurate altimeter setting because the Kollsman setting was off the scale. FSS had a much broader range in their instruments but precautions were in place. Environment Canada's mercury barometers had a larger scale and was considered more accurate but I do believe caution dictated the procedures in CAP Gen were required. Basically once visually above the MOCA/MEA, flight levels were used. When it happened to me, I was in Fort Chip and altimeter was above FSS's scale but the Edmonton altimeter setting was within range of their instruments so we could get an accurate altimeter setting for approach and landing but at Fort Chip, we had set our altimeters to field elevation and climb visually to the flight levels. Because I was in a Cheyenne, it was no problem but if I had to land in YMM, I would have had to do an ILS. Since this was the very first time this problem had ever surfaced, this was the quick fix. At FL190, there was a 2000 foot difference between the altimeter setting and FL190. From there, we had to apply the temperature correction for landing because it was cold enough to freeze the balls off a brass monkey.
---------- ADS -----------
 
The average pilot, despite the somewhat swaggering exterior, is very much capable of such feelings as love, affection, intimacy and caring.
These feelings just don't involve anyone else.
User avatar
Beefitarian
Top Poster
Top Poster
Posts: 6605
Joined: Wed Dec 01, 2010 10:53 am
Location: A couple of meters away from others.

Re: Low Px altitude correction on Appraoch

Post by Beefitarian »

I know it's not tough to extrapolate you must mean pressure but.

Doesn't Px stand for passenger?
---------- ADS -----------
 
Post Reply

Return to “General Comments”