Proposed AD for Cessna 172, 182, 206, 207, 210.

This forum has been developed to discuss aviation related topics.

Moderators: sky's the limit, sepia, Sulako, lilfssister, North Shore, I WAS Birddog

Post Reply
J31
Rank (9)
Rank (9)
Posts: 1234
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2004 7:21 am

Proposed AD for Cessna 172, 182, 206, 207, 210.

Post by J31 »

Cracks in the forward cabin doorpost could cost up to $3000 to repair.

https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2018-0 ... -01923.pdf
---------- ADS -----------
 
CpnCrunch
Rank 11
Rank 11
Posts: 4016
Joined: Mon Feb 08, 2010 9:38 am

Re: Proposed AD for Cessna 172, 182, 206, 207, 210.

Post by CpnCrunch »

It will only require repair if cracks are found, and I think I'd prefer to know about the cracks and have them repaired. Otherwise it will just add some time to the annual inspection.

I am wondering if doing it annually is perhaps overkill. It seems unlikely that if the plane is flying < 1000hrs per year that you'd suddenly end up with cracks if it has been ok for the past 40 years. Perhaps it should be something like once every 1000hrs or every 5 years whichever comes sooner.
---------- ADS -----------
 
geneticistx
Rank 3
Rank 3
Posts: 174
Joined: Sat Oct 22, 2016 6:07 pm

Re: Proposed AD for Cessna 172, 182, 206, 207, 210.

Post by geneticistx »

i have an M
---------- ADS -----------
 
Chris M
Rank 5
Rank 5
Posts: 366
Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2013 8:41 am
Location: Toronto

Re: Proposed AD for Cessna 172, 182, 206, 207, 210.

Post by Chris M »

geneticistx wrote: Fri Feb 02, 2018 11:03 am i have an M
Likewise. Wonder what changed with the N model that would make it more susceptible to structural issues than the M. Other than 10 extra HP I don't know if there's much difference between the two.
---------- ADS -----------
 
User avatar
JasonE
Rank 8
Rank 8
Posts: 838
Joined: Sat Sep 06, 2014 8:26 pm

Re: Proposed AD for Cessna 172, 182, 206, 207, 210.

Post by JasonE »

That makes me feel a bit better about the proposed spar inspection AD on my Cherokee.....sigh. Bottom line is, we want to know what we are flying is safe.
---------- ADS -----------
 
"Carelessness and overconfidence are more dangerous than deliberately accepted risk." -Wilbur Wright
black hole
Rank 5
Rank 5
Posts: 370
Joined: Fri Jun 01, 2007 12:10 pm
Location: Ontario
Contact:

Re: Proposed AD for Cessna 172, 182, 206, 207, 210.

Post by black hole »

not C180/185?

BH
---------- ADS -----------
 
StudentPilot
Rank 3
Rank 3
Posts: 164
Joined: Sun Oct 29, 2006 5:02 pm

Re: Proposed AD for Cessna 172, 182, 206, 207, 210.

Post by StudentPilot »

Early (pre-N) 172s and early (pre-E) 182s are not listed in the AD.

Presumably those early 172s/182s and 180/185s (that have a common fuselage with early 182s) have a different structure than the models included in the AD which has not led to cracks (yet).

Not overly expensive and I will be happy to know that the struts on the Cessna I fly are solidly attached to the fuselage, although it is another reason to look for a 185...
---------- ADS -----------
 
Post Reply

Return to “General Comments”