photofly wrote: ↑Fri Jul 24, 2020 8:40 pm
Legislation does not exist in a vacuum, and should be interpreted in a purposive way. What is the purpose of this exemption? It is to allow airlines and the transport industry, considered to be
so vital to the functioning of the nation that strict and universal quarantine rules should be exempted, to function in way that it could no longer do if those people operating that industry had to quarantine on entering Canada. The transport industry is without any doubt not affected by private aircraft owners having to quarantine. There seems to me to be little doubt that if a forum where professional expertise in interpreting laws is exercised ever had to examine this issue, it would decide exemption does not apply.
If we assume the goal of the legislation is to prevent COVID spread, yet to allow certain activities as you mentioned, then why would the legislator care *who* performs the action?
The situation here is that an airplane/good needs to be transported from place A to place B. This is allowed, the only question is, does the pilot flying from A to B need to quarantine upon arrival in B, correct?
If the government is ok with pilot P travelling across the border multiple times a day, who is interacting with multiple people, yet does not have to quarantine? Why then would the government not be ok with pilot Q doing the exact same thing, but only once?
You might think then that it is logical that only airline pilots or freight pilots are allowed to do this, as they need to transport hundreds of people and thousands of pounds of goods. Yet the legislator also allows pilots from private jets to be exempt. Often only carrying one person and personal luggage. Why can that pilot fly across the border without quarantine, yet if he were to do the same thing in his own personal airplane, he couldn't? What about owner/operators flying their own jet around under a management AOC?
I don't think it is a sure thing that it would be ruled that the OP needs to quarantine upon return into Canada.
photofly wrote: ↑Fri Jul 24, 2020 8:40 pm
There is no more overriding reason to exempt someone from quarantine on fetching their private aircraft from a foreign country than there is to exempt them from fetching their private car, or their pet ocelot.
The quote:
Persons in the trade or transportation sector who are important for the movement of goods or people, including truck drivers and crew members on any aircraft, shipping vessel or train, and that cross the border while performing their duties or for the purpose of performing their duties
Does not specify the drivers of cars. If you own a personal boat or a personal semi which you drive yourself, then you would qualify for this exemption. An ocelot owner is not included in there, unless he also happens to be flying his own airplane.
photofly wrote: ↑Fri Jul 24, 2020 8:40 pm
If you honestly think that fetching a private aircraft is deserving of quarantine exemption, you are not treating the quarantine rules with the seriousness the government does.
I don't, but I also don't think the exemption should be in place for private jets. If the rules allow one, the other should be allowed as well.
Either way, what I think is deserving doesn't really matter. It is the legislator who specified "crew members on any aircraft". They could have specified "commercially" or "airline" or a min weight etc.