Attitude Indicator vs Artificial Horizon

This forum has been developed to discuss aviation related topics.

Moderators: sky's the limit, sepia, Sulako, lilfssister, North Shore, I WAS Birddog

User avatar
PT6-114A
Rank 5
Rank 5
Posts: 371
Joined: Wed Feb 18, 2004 8:06 am
Location: I love the south

Re: Attitude Indicator vs Artificial Horizon

Post by PT6-114A »

I was told some long time ago that the term “artificial horizon” was not correct as you can’t see yaw hence forth call it an “Attitude indicator” seemed to make sense to me.
---------- ADS -----------
 
digits_
Top Poster
Top Poster
Posts: 5970
Joined: Mon Feb 14, 2011 2:26 am

Re: Attitude Indicator vs Artificial Horizon

Post by digits_ »

PT6-114A wrote: Tue Sep 28, 2021 5:13 pm I was told some long time ago that the term “artificial horizon” was not correct as you can’t see yaw hence forth call it an “Attitude indicator” seemed to make sense to me.
How would one see yaw on a real horizon?
---------- ADS -----------
 
As an AvCanada discussion grows longer:
-the probability of 'entitlement' being mentioned, approaches 1
-one will be accused of using bad airmanship
Thair81
Rank 2
Rank 2
Posts: 62
Joined: Mon Aug 01, 2005 4:53 pm

Re: Attitude Indicator vs Artificial Horizon

Post by Thair81 »

15 years after I asked the question initially and the debate has started up again. Impressive. Glad the old question can still generate a bit of thought and discussion.

This has got to be some sort of record for this “esteemed” message board.
---------- ADS -----------
 
User avatar
‘Bob’
Rank 7
Rank 7
Posts: 723
Joined: Fri Apr 23, 2021 10:19 am

Re: Attitude Indicator vs Artificial Horizon

Post by ‘Bob’ »

digits_ wrote: Tue Sep 28, 2021 5:15 pm
PT6-114A wrote: Tue Sep 28, 2021 5:13 pm I was told some long time ago that the term “artificial horizon” was not correct as you can’t see yaw hence forth call it an “Attitude indicator” seemed to make sense to me.
How would one see yaw on a real horizon?
By looking at the terrain features moving sideways.

But maybe they didn’t have synthetic vision a long time ago.
---------- ADS -----------
 
TELL THOMPSON WE’RE COMIN’ IN HOT!!

http://www.subgenius.com/bigfist/answer ... _FAQ_.html
digits_
Top Poster
Top Poster
Posts: 5970
Joined: Mon Feb 14, 2011 2:26 am

Re: Attitude Indicator vs Artificial Horizon

Post by digits_ »

‘Bob’ wrote: Thu Sep 30, 2021 12:30 am
digits_ wrote: Tue Sep 28, 2021 5:15 pm
PT6-114A wrote: Tue Sep 28, 2021 5:13 pm I was told some long time ago that the term “artificial horizon” was not correct as you can’t see yaw hence forth call it an “Attitude indicator” seemed to make sense to me.
How would one see yaw on a real horizon?
By looking at the terrain features moving sideways.

But maybe they didn’t have synthetic vision a long time ago.
That could be a crosswind as well.
---------- ADS -----------
 
As an AvCanada discussion grows longer:
-the probability of 'entitlement' being mentioned, approaches 1
-one will be accused of using bad airmanship
User avatar
‘Bob’
Rank 7
Rank 7
Posts: 723
Joined: Fri Apr 23, 2021 10:19 am

Re: Attitude Indicator vs Artificial Horizon

Post by ‘Bob’ »

Would have to be one hell of a crosswind. They generally make things move at oblique angles to the horizon, not parallel to it.
---------- ADS -----------
 
TELL THOMPSON WE’RE COMIN’ IN HOT!!

http://www.subgenius.com/bigfist/answer ... _FAQ_.html
penguinair
Rank 0
Rank 0
Posts: 1
Joined: Sat Feb 03, 2024 11:21 am

Re: Attitude Indicator vs Artificial Horizon

Post by penguinair »

I had the same questions based on the Buddy Holly plane crash story...After a lot of searching, I finally found a website and youtube video explaining the clear differences that we have all "heard tell" about. In short, it is the opposite visual cues provided by the Sperry Attitude Gyro vs the Conventional Gyro...

https://aviation.stackexchange.com/ques ... pside-down

...and the YouTube video that the link above references...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dhwCHNoezts
---------- ADS -----------
 
CaptDukeNukem
Rank (9)
Rank (9)
Posts: 1166
Joined: Sun Oct 16, 2022 9:33 am

Re: Attitude Indicator vs Artificial Horizon

Post by CaptDukeNukem »

Does it show your position relative to the horizon? If yes; you’re in business
---------- ADS -----------
 
Big Pistons Forever
Top Poster
Top Poster
Posts: 5869
Joined: Wed Feb 18, 2004 7:17 pm
Location: West Coast

Re: Attitude Indicator vs Artificial Horizon

Post by Big Pistons Forever »

The only thing I care about is whether it has a roll pointer or sky pointer.

The original Chinese AI in my Nanchang has color coding opposite to what Western units have. The blue is on the bottom and the brown is on the top. I have never been able to find an explanation as to why this is. Anybody got any ideas ?
---------- ADS -----------
 
Posthumane
Rank 7
Rank 7
Posts: 649
Joined: Sat May 09, 2009 6:16 pm

Re: Attitude Indicator vs Artificial Horizon

Post by Posthumane »

BPF, a Nanchang pilot told me it's because the AI they use is a "fixed ball in space" design similar to the Sperry attitude gyro. In the Sperry, a pitch up would cause the airplane wings to move down to the blue side of the fixed ball, and when pitching down the wings would move up to the brown side. Is this how the Nanchang one works too?
---------- ADS -----------
 
"People who say it cannot be done should not interrupt those who are doing it." -George Bernard Shaw
bodyflyer2
Rank 1
Rank 1
Posts: 29
Joined: Mon Dec 05, 2016 4:05 pm

Re: Attitude Indicator vs Artificial Horizon

Post by bodyflyer2 »

Let's be careful here about what we're talking about. If I got this right - and I'm a bit new at this:

In general, an AI and AH indicate in the same manner when it comes to pitch and roll.
The thing about "they work opposite in pitch" only applies to very specific odd instruments that are no longer common. Such as that Sperry instrument mentioned in the Buddy Holly crash stuff, or perhaps the old Russian instruments.


So we can have an AI in a climbing bank:
Screenshot 2024-02-11 at 15-22-23 Title Watch Your Attitude A Complete Guide to Aircraft Attitude Indicators.png
Screenshot 2024-02-11 at 15-22-23 Title Watch Your Attitude A Complete Guide to Aircraft Attitude Indicators.png (132.36 KiB) Viewed 385 times
Or an electronic EFIS that works the same way in a climb:
Screenshot 2024-02-11 at 15-22-41 Electronic Flight Instrument System (EFIS) SKYbrary Aviation Safety.png
Screenshot 2024-02-11 at 15-22-41 Electronic Flight Instrument System (EFIS) SKYbrary Aviation Safety.png (338.87 KiB) Viewed 385 times
And finally, a climbing bank for an old Gyro Horizon or Artificial Horizon ..... versus the Sperry F3 "Attitude Gyro" in particular, of the Buddy Holly crash era, which is different:
2024-02-11_152505.png
2024-02-11_152505.png (776.22 KiB) Viewed 385 times
(That's out of the youtube video Penguinair posted about the Buddy Holly crash in 1959.)

I don't know what other instruments used, but the Sperry F3 certainly pops up as being unusual when one googles it.

I'm being a bit pedantic here with all the pic as I wanted to be clear to myself too, that I've got this stuff straight! Comments of course welcome.
---------- ADS -----------
 
rigpiggy
Rank 10
Rank 10
Posts: 2861
Joined: Sun Jan 16, 2005 7:17 pm
Location: west to east and west again

Re: Attitude Indicator vs Artificial Horizon

Post by rigpiggy »

I remember a few years back some company had a rebuild that would pa int the blue/Brown on the old AH's TC caused quite a kerfuffle in not allowing it. Legal vs safe tw!ts
---------- ADS -----------
 
Post Reply

Return to “General Comments”