Jets for Air Inuit

This forum has been developed to discuss aviation related topics.

Moderators: sky's the limit, sepia, Sulako, lilfssister, North Shore, I WAS Birddog

jjj
Rank 7
Rank 7
Posts: 746
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2004 12:53 am

Post by jjj »

Last number I heard was 47 million for '37 NG 700 series.
---------- ADS -----------
 
sanjet
Rank 8
Rank 8
Posts: 920
Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 8:54 am

Post by sanjet »

Goose757 wrote:
RNAV wrote:
sanjet wrote: What site would that be?

That's not from any site. That's from talking with people.
I think he meant which work site would that be. But I could be wrong.
Yes I was talking about work site.
---------- ADS -----------
 
RNAV
Rank 1
Rank 1
Posts: 18
Joined: Mon Apr 10, 2006 7:30 pm

Post by RNAV »

Sorry my bad-
Air Inuit operates Dash 8-400s on behalf of Hydro Quebec out of YUL. They go up the various stations around La Grande.. quite the operation.
Wondering if they might be upgrading to larger aircraft with the purchase of jets?
---------- ADS -----------
 
185/310
Rank 4
Rank 4
Posts: 216
Joined: Sun Jan 23, 2005 2:13 pm

Post by 185/310 »

Air Inuit has bought two 737-200's, I believe there planning to service communities on the east side of hudson bay area. The reason why companies like this purchase 200's is because they have no choice. They need them for gravel ops, and the ones they did purchase I believe are combi's.
---------- ADS -----------
 
twotter
Rank (9)
Rank (9)
Posts: 1480
Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2004 11:28 am

Post by twotter »

tincanflyer wrote:
W5 wrote:737-200 Combi's are very rare!
And Alaska Airlines' old -200C's can't be sold/re-sold anywhere in North America. :evil:

I have heard this too, and know that it is fact![/quote]

I'm kinda curious about this one. Why if they are certified in the US would they be not be allowed in Canada? Was it a one of certification? Was there some field approval that would not qualify in Canada? Sorry but curious..
---------- ADS -----------
 
User avatar
oldtimer
Rank 10
Rank 10
Posts: 2296
Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2004 7:04 pm
Location: Calgary

Post by oldtimer »

One thing has always made me wonder.
Initial start-up cost aside, large jets are the cheapest way to go if you have the traffic to support the capacity but a big thorn in the whole operation is the lack of suitable infastructure, namely a hard surfaced runway. If you have a bunch of freight and or people to move, airplanes are available, either purchase or lease, almost everywhere. Hundreds are parked in the desert.
But everyone is kind of stuck with the B737 - 200 or B727 with the gravel kit because of the available runways.
I now money is an issue but with all of the money various governments waste, maybe some of it could be siphoned off for northern runway development.
Having worked for roadbuilders, I know there are problems and issues with building and maintaining a hard surfaced road(runway) but all it will take is a large hockey sock full of (large denomination) money.
Do we, as Canadians, want to develope our northern resources or do we just want to turn out the lights and forget the whole deal.
What do the Russians do? I suppose it is beyond us to go look see. Maybe they have a solution.
Any thoughts?
---------- ADS -----------
 
The average pilot, despite the somewhat swaggering exterior, is very much capable of such feelings as love, affection, intimacy and caring.
These feelings just don't involve anyone else.
wingspan
Rank 4
Rank 4
Posts: 204
Joined: Wed Aug 10, 2005 10:04 am

Post by wingspan »

Anyone have info on conditions & pay?
Thanks,

Feel free to PM
---------- ADS -----------
 
Lommer
Rank 7
Rank 7
Posts: 686
Joined: Sun Aug 28, 2005 5:44 pm

Post by Lommer »

The Russians don't pave their runways. Several major airports in Russia still have (very large) gravel ruways. The Russians just build their planes like tanks, and they don't worry as much as us when they inevitably get damaged. Perhaps this just illustrates the need for a new-generation jet in the 727/737 capacity range that's capable of gravel ops. Maybe bombardier should re-tool its C-series jet to fill that role? Who better to tackle this than us Canadians? (Ok maybe the Russians could do it better but the West has already demonstrated a total unwillingness to even look at Russian machines).


I'm also interested in the Alaska Airlines -200C story. Twotter: I would suspect that the reason isn't certification, it's some sort of political BS business restriction on who Alaska can re-sell the planes to. Not sure, but the fact that it's a North America-wide ban doesn't point to some Canadian certification quirk.
---------- ADS -----------
 
DA900
Rank 7
Rank 7
Posts: 705
Joined: Fri Feb 20, 2004 3:21 pm
Location: CYYC

Post by DA900 »

Lommer you are pretty close about the Alaska Airlines comment. We looked at a few of their combi's, but were advised that they will not sell any of them to North American buyers.
They do not want any companies that may compete with them on contracts. This being said I always scratch my head because we and other operators will get them somewhere else, so why don't you sell them to us and make some money.

I guess ego's always get in the way of common sense
---------- ADS -----------
 
Rectum, damn near killed 'em
Lommer
Rank 7
Rank 7
Posts: 686
Joined: Sun Aug 28, 2005 5:44 pm

Post by Lommer »

Hrm, perhaps there is money to be made by starting a shell African airline that buys a bunch of old Alaska -200C's and resells them to North American operators at a profit? :lol: :lol:
---------- ADS -----------
 
W5
Rank 8
Rank 8
Posts: 985
Joined: Wed Feb 18, 2004 4:44 pm
Location: Edmonton,AB

Post by W5 »

Apparently they cannot be resold in North America (via wherever) at anytime. The reason is not clear to me, or to the people that told me . (perhaps liability?)
---------- ADS -----------
 
dji
Rank 2
Rank 2
Posts: 98
Joined: Wed May 26, 2004 6:43 am

Post by dji »

http://www.tc.gc.ca/aviation/activepage ... search.asp

At owner name, enter air inuit then look at number 12 on the list :D

could not link to the search result page directly.
---------- ADS -----------
 
Rudy
Rank (9)
Rank (9)
Posts: 1171
Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2004 10:00 am
Location: N. Ont

Post by Rudy »

737-2S2C, is that a combi? How many cases of Pepsi can you put on?
---------- ADS -----------
 
sanjet
Rank 8
Rank 8
Posts: 920
Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 8:54 am

Post by sanjet »

Wow so it is true! Where will they be based? YUL I suppose?

First Air / Canadian North must be keeping an eye on them right now...
---------- ADS -----------
 
Louis
Rank 8
Rank 8
Posts: 997
Joined: Sun Feb 15, 2004 7:28 pm
Location: CYUL

Post by Louis »

http://www.airliners.net/open.file/1147540/L/

Looks like the aircraft spent some time in the UAE.

Louis
---------- ADS -----------
 
sanjet
Rank 8
Rank 8
Posts: 920
Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 8:54 am

Post by sanjet »

I still wonder how they operate a 737 though, I haven't heard any major new contracts. We will find out real soon I guess.

Who knows, lease it out??!?!
---------- ADS -----------
 
User avatar
Vickers vanguard
Rank 7
Rank 7
Posts: 531
Joined: Mon Aug 23, 2004 2:04 pm
Location: YUL

Post by Vickers vanguard »

Louis wrote:http://www.airliners.net/open.file/1147540/L/

Looks like the aircraft spent some time in the UAE.

Louis
yaaaaaaak! Sharjah ??? that's a nasty place to pick-up an old 737......all kind of bizzare stuff/operators on that airport
---------- ADS -----------
 
pelmet
Top Poster
Top Poster
Posts: 7157
Joined: Tue Jun 14, 2005 2:48 pm

Post by pelmet »

[quote="sanjet"]Wow so it is true![/quote]


Yup
---------- ADS -----------
 
40ktcrosswind
Rank 0
Rank 0
Posts: 7
Joined: Tue Apr 10, 2007 8:33 pm
Location: TO FAR FROM HOME

Post by 40ktcrosswind »

Looks like the plane is now in Hamilton

http://flightaware.com/live/flight/CGAIG
---------- ADS -----------
 
MAX POWER PTICH FULL FINE FLAPS 10°... EASY !!!
plhought
Rank 7
Rank 7
Posts: 500
Joined: Mon Oct 18, 2004 11:02 am
Location: Calgary

Post by plhought »

Spooooooky....
---------- ADS -----------
 
Post Reply

Return to “General Comments”