* AvCanada's Home Page * Photo Gallery * Directory * Topsites *Weather *Enter Chat * Media Kit
It is currently Thu May 23, 2013 9:50 am



All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is chatting

Who is chatting
Enter Chat




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 19 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Sat Sep 13, 2008 8:41 am 
Offline
Rank 2
Rank 2

Joined: Mon Jun 18, 2007 9:40 pm
Posts: 97
I hear both survived ok and am wondering on cause..fuel starvation???looks like a Cherokee went down...it appears they did a good job on the bog...


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Sep 13, 2008 9:35 am 
Offline
Rank 8
Rank 8
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:56 pm
Posts: 763
orbit wrote:
I hear both survived ok and am wondering on cause..fuel starvation???looks like a Cherokee went down...it appears they did a good job on the bog...



my old FTU! I'm glad both are okay.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Sep 13, 2008 4:00 pm 
Offline
Rank 10
Rank 10
User avatar

Joined: Tue Apr 26, 2005 9:52 pm
Posts: 2056
Location: CYVR
Shame to see that, glad to hear everyone is OK. The owner/CFI/DFTE is a great guy, hope it all works out in the end.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Sep 13, 2008 9:49 pm 
Offline
Rank 8
Rank 8

Joined: Sat Mar 15, 2008 5:43 am
Posts: 985
I don't really like the CFI but those Cherokee's were bound to have something happen to them. I don't like their conditions, many are on overdue engine changes.

Oh well, hope they're all safe and sound !


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Sep 14, 2008 12:10 am 
Offline
Top Poster
Top Poster
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2004 4:31 am
Posts: 16656
Quote:
I don't like their conditions, many are on overdue engine changes.


Are you saying that company is flying airplanes with engines that do not meet the criteria for airworthiness?

How did you come by that information?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Sep 14, 2008 12:39 am 
Offline
Rank 10
Rank 10
User avatar

Joined: Tue Apr 26, 2005 9:52 pm
Posts: 2056
Location: CYVR
I believe he means many of there engines are on condition.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Sep 14, 2008 12:49 am 
Offline
Rank 8
Rank 8

Joined: Fri Feb 27, 2004 5:15 pm
Posts: 912
Location: Right beside my dog again...
Oh, never mind. Glad to hear of a good ending.


Last edited by Mitch Cronin on Sun Sep 14, 2008 1:46 am, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Sep 14, 2008 12:51 am 
Offline
Rank 3
Rank 3

Joined: Sun Sep 07, 2008 11:11 pm
Posts: 105
200hr Wonder wrote:
Shame to see that, glad to hear everyone is OK. The owner/CFI/DFTE is a great guy, hope it all works out in the end.



Ron's awesome, and glad to hear his plane was taken care of with professionalism. The insinuation that he was operating illegally is a real shock, and I'm not surprised E-Flyer offered no information to back up his statement, because there probably isn't any. Ron and CFC are a safety first operator.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Sep 14, 2008 1:48 am 
Offline
Rank (9)
Rank (9)
User avatar

Joined: Fri Oct 28, 2005 3:18 am
Posts: 1484
Location: CYVR
I never saw any illegal operations there. When it was time for maintenance it always got done, and it appeared properly.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Sep 14, 2008 1:54 am 
Offline
Rank 8
Rank 8

Joined: Sat Mar 15, 2008 5:43 am
Posts: 985
Duncan a lot of them are on condition.

No need to assume what I am like just cause I don't like the CFI. You don't know me and I don't know you. So save yourself some hassle.

I am glad they all are fine. When I rented with them I chose the planes that were not on condition.

I don't know where you got the idea that I don't back my information.

If you want more information go to Safari and dig up the tech specs yourself.


What's the last info on it anyway? what happened?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Sep 14, 2008 2:39 am 
Offline
Rank 3
Rank 3

Joined: Sun Sep 07, 2008 11:11 pm
Posts: 105
asdfasdf


Last edited by Duncan Idaho on Thu Dec 06, 2012 12:24 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Sep 14, 2008 2:51 am 
Offline
Top Poster
Top Poster
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2004 4:31 am
Posts: 16656
Quote:
I can't help but have noticed that you're a fresh CPL


For a fresh CPL this one had better hope no one figures out who he/she if he/she plans on getting a job as a pilot.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Sep 14, 2008 3:50 am 
Offline
Rank 8
Rank 8

Joined: Sat Mar 15, 2008 5:43 am
Posts: 985
Duncan Idaho wrote:
E-Flyer wrote:
Duncan a lot of them are on condition.

No need to assume what I am like just cause I don't like the CFI. You don't know me and I don't know you. So save yourself some hassle.


It's not a hassle to me at all. But I take issue with the fact that you accuse a small business of operating aircraft which, "many are on overdue engine changes." The only way I can interpret this statement is that he is running engines past their Time Before Overhaul. The world of aviation is a small one, and rumors of a company running engines past their TBOs, which is the only way my humble intellect can imagine interpreting this statement, can be severely damaging to their reputation at an airport with nothing BUT flight training units.

I can't help but have noticed that you're a fresh CPL, and as such I can only infer that your, for lack of a better term, "hate on" for the CFI of CFC, Ron Harkas, is due to his diligence as a CFI and DFTE in grilling you as hard as possible in your flight training and flight test. Ron fails very few people, but he does try to teach you as much as possible during your training and your ride. If you took offense to his best efforts to help you survive your career in a risky business, I would consider it negligent of me to refrain defending him of your naivety.

Canadian Flight Centre is a good place to train, to flight test and to work. I learned a lot of valuable lessons from Ron. He always cared and he was always as thorough an instructor as possible, with many DECADES of experience to draw on. Much, much more than the majority of instructors I encountered, and he felt the sense of duty to impart it to us.


Ron never failed me, actually I was there for both my PPL CPL and MIFR training. His instructors actually referred to me as their favourite and smartest student. I appreciate the organization, I made a great deal of friends and connections there that will be a help all around the industry. And no, by overdue engines I was referring to on condition. I should of used that terminology. 200 hour corrected me.

I am surprised there is no news on this as of yet, what actually happened to their plane?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Sep 14, 2008 10:12 am 
Offline
Rank 2
Rank 2

Joined: Wed Mar 07, 2007 4:37 am
Posts: 75
Quote:
His instructors actually referred to me as their favourite and smartest student.


How incredibly humble of you!

Quote:
I should of used that terminology.


Allow me to suggest some grammar lessons before you try joining mesa, oh great one.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Sep 14, 2008 8:20 pm 
Offline
Rank 7
Rank 7

Joined: Thu Apr 12, 2007 2:19 am
Posts: 547
AdamB wrote:
Quote:
His instructors actually referred to me as their favourite and smartest student.


How incredibly humble of you!

Quote:
I should of used that terminology.


Allow me to suggest some grammar lessons before you try joining mesa, oh great one.


That's Mensa. But I totally agree with you.

Mesa is a bankrupt airline in Arizona, I believe.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Sep 14, 2008 8:34 pm 
Offline
Rank 2
Rank 2
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 29, 2007 4:20 am
Posts: 51
E-Flyer wrote:
...referred to me as their favourite and smartest student.



whoop, whoop, EGO EXCEEDANCE, EGO EXCEEDANCE, pull up !


:lol: :prayer:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Sep 14, 2008 8:51 pm 
Offline
Rank 5
Rank 5
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2006 7:35 pm
Posts: 389
And here on Avcanada we refer to you as our favourite and smartest poster E-Flyer. I always appreciate your wisdom, and vast experience.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Sep 16, 2008 4:34 am 
Offline
Rank 0
Rank 0

Joined: Mon Sep 15, 2008 12:49 am
Posts: 4
Any details on this accident? There is nothing in the CADORS


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Sep 16, 2008 2:27 pm 
Offline
Top Poster
Top Poster

Joined: Thu May 27, 2004 2:40 pm
Posts: 10432
Location: CYSH
Sigh. Here we go again.

Engine TBO is a statistical value. Everyone here being
pilots, likely almost no one has a clue about mathematics or
statistics, but as a hint, here is my favorite statistic:

A man with his head in the freezer, and feet in the stove,
is on average comfortable.

TBO isn't just about hours since major, either, which everyone
myopically focusses on. You take a brand new engine with
say ONE hour on it, and park it without pickling in a humid,
salty environment for two years, and it's trash due to internal
corrosion. Hm.

Engine manufacturers (like Lycoming) may assign a certain
number of hours of use per month with respect to TBO,
regardless of whether or not it is flown. So after 10 years,
likely your Lycoming engine is past TBO, regardless of hours
flown.

I've flown an elderly twin with 5500 SMOH on one engine. No
typo. It was in Florida, no cold starts, it flew a lot, and they
just kept changing jugs and accessories as required.

I've also flown a T-34 in Atlanta in a simulated air combat
operation. It had a new TCM IO-550 installed, and let me
tell you, it wasn't exactly babied. It flew a LOT. At 2600
SMOH, well past TBO, they got nervous and pulled it for
overhaul, and EVERY PART OF THE ENGINE WAS WITHIN
SERVICE LIMITS.

Executive Summary: hours SMOH, by itself, is a very
poor way of measuring the health of an engine. A low
time engine may be trashed. A high time engine may
be quite good.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 19 posts ] 


All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: 300_hour_wonder, Bing [Bot], Google [Bot], Yahoo [Bot] and 31 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group

 
For questions/comments please send them to
webmaster@avcanada.ca


AvCanada Topsites List
AVIATION TOP 100 - www.avitop.com Avitop.com

While the administrators and moderators of this  forum will attempt to remove or edit any generally objectionable material as  quickly as possible, it is impossible to review every message. If you feel a  topic or post is inappropriate email us at support@avcanada.ca .  By reading these forums you acknowledge that  all posts made to these forums express the views and opinions of the author and  not the administrators, moderators or webmaster (except for posts by these  people) and hence will not be held liable. This website is not responsible or liable in any way for any false or misleading messages or job ads placed at our site.   

Use AvCanada's information at your own risk!

We reserve the right to remove any messages that we deem unacceptable.
  When you post a message, your IP is logged and may be provided to concerned parties where unethical or illegal  behavior is apparent. All rights reserved.