The F-35 is not dead

This forum has been developed to discuss aviation related topics.

Moderators: sky's the limit, sepia, Sulako, lilfssister, North Shore, I WAS Birddog

Post Reply
Rockie
Top Poster
Top Poster
Posts: 8433
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 7:10 am

Re: The F-35 is not dead

Post by Rockie »

AuxBatOn wrote:Failures will occur and airframes will be lost. But not at any different rates than we lost and losing Hornets now.
Bold prediction for the future. Peter MacKay said much the same thing when he assured Canadians the F-35's engine would never quit.
trampbike wrote:Thanks for reminding me that I'm 4. I'll go back to eating toothpaste now.
No offence intended, but lots of people who should know better can't seem to recognize the radically different engine failure consequences between a single and a twin.
---------- ADS -----------
 
Mick G
Rank 4
Rank 4
Posts: 254
Joined: Sun Feb 28, 2016 7:21 pm
Location: Alberta

Re: The F-35 is not dead

Post by Mick G »

I don't see Canada moving forward with it; for anybody holding their breath, it's not going to happen. The CF18 will be flying well into the 2030's just wait and see..........
---------- ADS -----------
 
frosti
Rank 6
Rank 6
Posts: 459
Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2011 10:25 pm

Re: The F-35 is not dead

Post by frosti »

Mick G wrote:I don't see Canada moving forward with it; for anybody holding their breath, it's not going to happen. The CF18 will be flying well into the 2030's just wait and see..........
I feel sorry for those brave pilots. I refuse to fly back-seat in those things any more, way too old.
---------- ADS -----------
 
Spokes
Rank (9)
Rank (9)
Posts: 1057
Joined: Mon Apr 17, 2006 9:22 pm
Location: Toronto, On

Re: The F-35 is not dead

Post by Spokes »

Mick G wrote:I don't see Canada moving forward with it; for anybody holding their breath, it's not going to happen. The CF18 will be flying well into the 2030's just wait and see..........
Of course. Heck, we are still flying Sea Kings.
---------- ADS -----------
 
Wahunga!
User avatar
trampbike
Rank (9)
Rank (9)
Posts: 1013
Joined: Tue Jun 23, 2009 8:11 am

Re: The F-35 is not dead

Post by trampbike »

frosti wrote:I feel sorry for those brave pilots. I refuse to fly back-seat in those things any more, way too old.
An empty (or non-existent) backseat is the best backseat ;)
---------- ADS -----------
 
Last edited by trampbike on Thu Mar 24, 2016 6:27 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Think ahead or fall behind!
User avatar
Old fella
Rank 10
Rank 10
Posts: 2399
Joined: Mon Jan 29, 2007 7:04 am
Location: I'm retired. I don't want to'I don't have to and you can't make me.

Re: The F-35 is not dead

Post by Old fella »

Best procurement that went relative smooth was purchase of the C-17 heavy lift fleet , which no doubt was needed big time.
---------- ADS -----------
 
User avatar
Goshawk
Rank 0
Rank 0
Posts: 9
Joined: Sat Mar 19, 2016 3:25 pm

Re: The F-35 is not dead

Post by Goshawk »

All I can say is for the price of one... you can buy 10 AT-6 Wolverines and strap some AIM-120 AMRAAMs and AIM-9 Sidewinders on her and be better off.
---------- ADS -----------
 
WhiskeyWhiskey
Rank 2
Rank 2
Posts: 51
Joined: Sun Aug 03, 2014 2:38 pm

Re: The F-35 is not dead

Post by WhiskeyWhiskey »

Goshawk wrote:All I can say is for the price of one... you can buy 10 AT-6 Wolverines and strap some AIM-120 AMRAAMs and AIM-9 Sidewinders on her and be better off.
You will just get all the turd-nuggets arguing about "single engine this" and "single engine that"

If anything go with the Scorpion ISR/Strike aircraft also by Textron.
---------- ADS -----------
 
AuxBatOn
Rank 11
Rank 11
Posts: 3283
Joined: Wed Jan 16, 2008 6:13 pm
Location: North America, sometimes

Re: The F-35 is not dead

Post by AuxBatOn »

Goshawk wrote:All I can say is for the price of one... you can buy 10 AT-6 Wolverines and strap some AIM-120 AMRAAMs and AIM-9 Sidewinders on her and be better off.
AMRAAM on a T-6 huh. Shows how much you know about A/A missile employment...
---------- ADS -----------
 
Going for the deck at corner
AuxBatOn
Rank 11
Rank 11
Posts: 3283
Joined: Wed Jan 16, 2008 6:13 pm
Location: North America, sometimes

Re: The F-35 is not dead

Post by AuxBatOn »

WhiskeyWhiskey wrote:
Goshawk wrote:All I can say is for the price of one... you can buy 10 AT-6 Wolverines and strap some AIM-120 AMRAAMs and AIM-9 Sidewinders on her and be better off.
You will just get all the turd-nuggets arguing about "single engine this" and "single engine that"

If anything go with the Scorpion ISR/Strike aircraft also by Textron.

The Scorpion is a point design for Armed ISR. Nothing else. It wouldn't do well in the NORAD mission. How do you intercept a 777 flying M0.85 at 37000 ft in a Scorpion?
---------- ADS -----------
 
Going for the deck at corner
User avatar
xchox
Rank 5
Rank 5
Posts: 332
Joined: Fri Aug 15, 2008 3:58 pm

Re: The F-35 is not dead

Post by xchox »

Gripen... *mic drop*
---------- ADS -----------
 
Meatservo wrote:I just slap 'em in there. I don't even make sure they are lined up properly.
AuxBatOn
Rank 11
Rank 11
Posts: 3283
Joined: Wed Jan 16, 2008 6:13 pm
Location: North America, sometimes

Re: The F-35 is not dead

Post by AuxBatOn »

xchox wrote:Gripen... *mic drop*

Better keep our old Hornets then....
---------- ADS -----------
 
Going for the deck at corner
User avatar
xchox
Rank 5
Rank 5
Posts: 332
Joined: Fri Aug 15, 2008 3:58 pm

Re: The F-35 is not dead

Post by xchox »

AuxBatOn wrote:
xchox wrote:Gripen... *mic drop*

Better keep our old Hornets then....
Hahaha dude... Doesn't matter what we get... Someone will find piss in their cornflakes!
---------- ADS -----------
 
Meatservo wrote:I just slap 'em in there. I don't even make sure they are lined up properly.
Post Reply

Return to “General Comments”