AVCANADA

It is currently Tue Oct 24, 2017 3:46 am

All times are UTC-07:00




Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 10 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Tue Aug 16, 2016 6:52 pm 
Offline
Rank Moderator
Rank Moderator

Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2004 3:47 pm
Posts: 5165
Location: Straight outta Dundarave...
http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/british-columbia/air-ambulance-b-c-hospitals-1.3723596

Quote:
He said the problem stems from an interpretation of the performance standards in the manufacturers manual.

That manual suggests the Sikorsky helicopters don't have the performance capacity demanded by Transport Canada to land at certain helipads, classified as H-1, which have the strictest standards because they are surrounded by other buildings among other things..



A dispute over (I assume) single engine performance? Anyone in the know?


_________________
Say, what's that mountain goat doing up here in the mist?

Ass, Licence, Job. In that order.


Top
   
PostPosted: Tue Aug 16, 2016 8:29 pm 
Offline
Rank 7
Rank 7
User avatar

Joined: Tue Feb 07, 2012 9:35 pm
Posts: 620
As was explained to me by a TC helo guy, the machine needs to be able to shoot the approach on one engine and climb away within a certain gradient and routing...... not really any different than for fixed wing capability.

It is designed to minimize the likelihood the helo will end up in some intersection or a person's front yard in the event of a power loss.

Visual segment routing corridors may also be incorporated in procedures.



Top
   
PostPosted: Tue Aug 16, 2016 8:46 pm 
Offline
Rank 5
Rank 5
User avatar

Joined: Tue Apr 25, 2006 12:32 pm
Posts: 384
Location: YQY / YBW
This just happened in April in Nova Scotia.

http://atlantic.ctvnews.ca/regulation-b ... -1.2880642

I can't remember what happened after, whether they're still using the parking lot and Point Pleasant Park or whether they got permission to use the pads later.



Top
   
PostPosted: Fri Aug 19, 2016 7:21 am 
Offline
Rank (9)
Rank (9)

Joined: Wed Apr 29, 2009 2:14 pm
Posts: 1072
It's quite simple, if your helicopter is not capable of meeting the criteria then you need a new helicopter. The biggest argument so far is that "we've always done it this way". Again, surprise surprise, it comes down to money, all parties are going to have to break out the chequebook to come in line with the standards. The old 76's just don't have the jam but there are several other options available. Money is all you need.


Top
   
PostPosted: Fri Aug 26, 2016 6:32 am 
Offline
Rank 7
Rank 7
User avatar

Joined: Tue Feb 07, 2012 9:35 pm
Posts: 620
Well defined Helian.

The defence to progress in the industry I always found amazing is when someone is actually stupid enough to connect their tongue to their brain and say "We've never killed anybody," as if that is the only criteria to hold an AOC and transport the public.

SSH



Top
   
PostPosted: Wed Sep 07, 2016 8:18 am 
Offline
Rank 3
Rank 3

Joined: Wed May 30, 2007 11:21 am
Posts: 122
[quote="Heliian"]It's quite simple, if your helicopter is not capable of meeting the criteria then you need a new helicopter. The biggest argument so far is that "we've always done it this way". Again, surprise surprise, it comes down to money, all parties are going to have to break out the chequebook to come in line with the standards. The old 76's just don't have the jam but there are several other options available. Money is all you need.[/quote]

The question is: Why did it take 9 years to enforce? The next thing is, will the provinces buck up to pay for a CAT A performance machine, my guess is no. So that leaves no rotary wing medevac capability in BC and NS that meet H1 performance (which is not CAT A performance anyways). We are left with the what ifs, not unlike a single engine aircraft taking off in cities all over Canada everyday.



Top
   
PostPosted: Wed Sep 07, 2016 10:55 pm 
Offline
Rank 7
Rank 7
User avatar

Joined: Tue Feb 07, 2012 9:35 pm
Posts: 620
This was likely the last of a series of steps because the previous education, consultations, notice of proposed regulatory changes, the CARAC process, briefings, cajoling, threats, begging, cautions, etc failed to obtain any positive, measurable change to meet criteria which is there to protect Joe and Jane Schmoe in the public.

I doubt the Rotary wing POI for these operators was swinging in a hammock being fed peeled grapes by dancing girls for 9 years until being sent out of the office with direction to shut down the healthcare system.

SSH



Top
   
PostPosted: Fri Sep 23, 2016 8:53 am 
Offline
Rank 0
Rank 0

Joined: Thu Sep 17, 2015 2:25 pm
Posts: 5
I live very near to Children's Hospital in Vancouver. Several weeks ago a black notar helicopter did two approaches(dont know if it actually landed or hover turned and flew out). And then came back several days later and landed/shut-down. Anyone know anything about this helicopter?


Top
   
PostPosted: Fri Sep 23, 2016 7:10 pm 
Offline
Rank 3
Rank 3

Joined: Thu Nov 25, 2010 7:59 pm
Posts: 198
Yes. This:

http://bc.ctvnews.ca/province-hires-ext ... -1.3058555



Top
   
PostPosted: Sat Sep 24, 2016 11:30 am 
Offline
Rank 0
Rank 0

Joined: Thu Sep 17, 2015 2:25 pm
Posts: 5
Yep that was it. Thanks. Much quieter than the S-76. However the S-76 is a huge improvement(noise wise) over the Bell 222 that use to come in here.

Image



Top
   
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 10 posts ] 

All times are UTC-07:00


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 11 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited
[ GZIP: Off ]

For questions/comments please send them to
avcanada@gmail.com


AvCanada Topsites List
AVIATION TOP 100 - www.avitop.com Avitop.com

While the administrators and moderators of this forum will attempt to remove or edit any generally objectionable material as quickly as possible, it is impossible to review every message. If you feel a topic or post is inappropriate email us at avcanada@gmail.com .  By reading these forums you acknowledge that all posts made to these forums express the views and opinions of the author and not the administrators, moderators or webmaster (except for posts by these people) and hence will not be held liable. This website is not responsible or liable in any way for any false or misleading messages or job ads placed at our site. 

Use AvCanada's information at your own risk!

We reserve the right to remove any messages that we deem unacceptable.
When you post a message, your IP is logged and may be provided to concerned parties where unethical or illegal behavior is apparent. All rights reserved.