AVCANADA

It is currently Thu Oct 19, 2017 10:39 am

All times are UTC-07:00




Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 77 posts ]  Go to page 1 2 3 4 Next
Author Message
 Post subject: New TA?
PostPosted: Tue Sep 12, 2017 3:21 pm 
Offline
Rank 7
Rank 7
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 23, 2005 11:27 am
Posts: 714
Anyone wanna provide some new details on the new TA that was voted in today?


Top
   
 Post subject: Re: New TA?
PostPosted: Tue Sep 12, 2017 7:22 pm 
Offline
Rank 7
Rank 7

Joined: Mon Mar 28, 2011 8:50 pm
Posts: 607
Excellent DC pension traded for Rouge growth.


Top
   
 Post subject: Re: New TA?
PostPosted: Wed Sep 13, 2017 11:05 am 
Offline
Rank 3
Rank 3

Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 2:15 pm
Posts: 132
Fanblade wrote:
Excellent DC pension traded for Rouge growth.


Spoken like a true DBer.



Top
   
 Post subject: Re: New TA?
PostPosted: Wed Sep 13, 2017 11:17 am 
Offline
Rank 1
Rank 1

Joined: Thu Feb 16, 2012 12:20 pm
Posts: 19
Short term gains. long term pain


Top
   
 Post subject: Re: New TA?
PostPosted: Wed Sep 13, 2017 11:27 am 
Offline
Rank (9)
Rank (9)

Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 12:10 pm
Posts: 1489
FWIW - pension had to be fixed. Within the term of this TA (3 years) there will be 1500+ DC pilots. My guess is almost 100% of the current DC pilots voted 'yes'.

The question is whether ACPA extracted enough value for that improvement. Apparently 40% of the AC pilots think not, or did not care about that particular issue. Either way, it highlights a demographic divide within the group.

There is no doubt that bargaining under the terms of the current collective agreement with limited issue arbitration at the end is not ideal. Far from it. But the bottom line is that AC was not going to get Rouge fleet size relief without ACPA consent. And they got it.

Would be curious to see what the annualized value is projected to be for the company DC contributions. Most of the big numbers will not kick in for several years. Would also like to see estimates of AC pilot cost savings of Rouge incremental NB fleet deployment vs mainline fleet deployment.

When it comes to DC enhancements vs Rouge fleet growth it most certainly should not be a zero sum game.



Top
   
 Post subject: Re: New TA?
PostPosted: Wed Sep 13, 2017 11:44 am 
Offline
Rank 0
Rank 0

Joined: Mon Apr 17, 2017 2:44 pm
Posts: 14
Any improvements in new hire pay or anything else that would benefit them?


Top
   
 Post subject: Re: New TA?
PostPosted: Wed Sep 13, 2017 12:15 pm 
Offline
Rank 4
Rank 4

Joined: Wed Feb 11, 2009 8:01 pm
Posts: 261
Dry Guy wrote:
Any improvements in new hire pay or anything else that would benefit them?


They can get slightly more expensive glasses.



Top
   
 Post subject: Re: New TA?
PostPosted: Wed Sep 13, 2017 12:42 pm 
Offline
Rank (9)
Rank (9)

Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 12:10 pm
Posts: 1489
I am guessing that there is a lot of unannounced growth coming. AC operating 737's across the Atlantic means that some of the 319/320's may stay in service longer. Also more 787's may be added for international expansion and to permit Rouge NB fleet growth under the revised ratio.

AC knows exactly what is planned for the next 5 years...... or longer. And the TA is part of that. There is a Plan A. Plan B. Plan C. The ratification is probably going to allow AC to pursue Plan A.



Top
   
 Post subject: Re: New TA?
PostPosted: Wed Sep 13, 2017 12:43 pm 
Offline
Rank 3
Rank 3

Joined: Sat Sep 18, 2004 10:10 am
Posts: 195
Location: A Smokn' Hole
atphat wrote:
Dry Guy wrote:
Any improvements in new hire pay or anything else that would benefit them?


They can get slightly more expensive glasses.


Don't forget about the massages

But in all seriousness, Rudder's sums it up nice



Top
   
 Post subject: Re: New TA?
PostPosted: Wed Sep 13, 2017 2:13 pm 
Offline
Rank 8
Rank 8
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 8:54 am
Posts: 753
Dry Guy wrote:
Any improvements in new hire pay or anything else that would benefit them?



Apart from the DC plan, nothing material whatsoever.....



Top
   
 Post subject: Re: New TA?
PostPosted: Wed Sep 13, 2017 4:06 pm 
Offline
Rank 0
Rank 0

Joined: Thu Jun 30, 2016 4:31 pm
Posts: 7
I'll probably just take my type rating and go overseas then. A lot of my friends are planning to do the same thing. I wonder if Air Canada will have to implement a bond if too many new hires start doing that. Wouldn't that be something.


Top
   
 Post subject: Re: New TA?
PostPosted: Wed Sep 13, 2017 4:21 pm 
Offline
Rank 2
Rank 2

Joined: Wed Jan 09, 2008 2:46 pm
Posts: 77
sanjet wrote:
Dry Guy wrote:
Any improvements in new hire pay or anything else that would benefit them?



Apart from the DC plan, nothing material whatsoever.....


Even then ACPA pulled a slight of hand and misrepresented the difference. In the end most of the increase will just be paid by thebmembwrship in increases to their contribution rates.

The remainder of the contract is cost neutral, and borderline concessionary depending on how you view rouge expansion.

Although I did hear that the MEC chair had made reference that he would be retiring before any of the "fallout" from this amazing (cough) deal.



Top
   
 Post subject: Re: New TA?
PostPosted: Thu Sep 14, 2017 4:32 pm 
Offline
Rank 7
Rank 7

Joined: Mon Mar 28, 2011 8:50 pm
Posts: 607
aV1aTOr wrote:
Fanblade wrote:
Excellent DC pension traded for Rouge growth.


Spoken like a true DBer.


?

My comment wasn't meant to be sarcastic or negative. So why the shot?

Yes I am a DBer. I voted yes to this agreement because as Rudder put it, it needed to get fixed.

Your welcome.

FWIW I get the response considering the vocal "what's in it for me crowd".

So cheers!



Top
   
 Post subject: Re: New TA?
PostPosted: Thu Sep 14, 2017 4:47 pm 
Offline
Rank 7
Rank 7

Joined: Mon Mar 28, 2011 8:50 pm
Posts: 607
Jimmy_Hoffa wrote:

Even then ACPA pulled a slight of hand and misrepresented the difference. In the end most of the increase will just be paid by thebmembwrship in increases to their contribution rates.



The company contributes a higher percentage than the employee.

It really is a very very good DC pension.



Top
   
 Post subject: Re: New TA?
PostPosted: Thu Sep 14, 2017 5:44 pm 
Offline
Top Poster
Top Poster

Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 7:10 am
Posts: 7249
Who cares if anything else was gained? The correction to the DC pension while not nearly making up for losing the DB for post 2012 pilots was absolutely necessary, and worth it even if some of those pilots don't themselves realize it yet.

For the rest of us, by comparison we have nothing to complain about.



Top
   
 Post subject: Re: New TA?
PostPosted: Thu Sep 14, 2017 6:16 pm 
Offline
Rank 2
Rank 2

Joined: Wed Jan 09, 2008 2:46 pm
Posts: 77
Rockie wrote:
Who cares if anything else was gained? The correction to the DC pension while not nearly making up for losing the DB for post 2012 pilots was absolutely necessary, and worth it even if some of those pilots don't themselves realize it yet.

For the rest of us, by comparison we have nothing to complain about.


I didn't say it wasn't an improvement that wasn't needed. All I said is that the union misrepresented the numbers and the difference to the new MEPP is not going to be as great as what people are expecting or was shown on the slides. When juxtaposed against the real DC numbers (ie. 8% industry standard growth vs 5.5% ACPA growth, including overtime in rouge calculations if you want those numbers, no NAVAID/Overseas pay for widebody positions to short the ML side of the equation) plus guaranteed improvements to it through arbitration the difference is even smaller. If you really want to get financially savvy take the extra 1.5% you are now going to have to contribute and add that to your RRSP instead and we close the gap a little more. The value individuals place on portability and estate planing are varried, but it was pure magic how the NC managed to pull out a 5 year survivor benefit mid way through the road show. Ask your pension rep if any further increases can be negotiated with the MEPP... they can't. Your per year credit of 1.9% is it and the company is officially clear of any liabilities or responsibilities save making on time payments.

Part of the justification for this MEPP was because new hires were not taking the 10 mins to log into a website and show some interest in their pension. Where was the union on this front to help guide the new hires? Information is power and our representatives didn't exactly empower the membership to make an truly informed decision and was asked to sacrifice a lot in turn. The value just wasn't there nor did they have a mandate to take the direction they did. They forced the membership between a rock (AIP) and a hard place (Arbitration). The result was an embarrassing 53% membership support.

The rest of us do indeed have lots to complain about. If you are on any of the narrow bodies, which I know you are not, then go take a look at what was silo bargained as cost neutral scheduling changes to reassignment and pairing integrity. Good luck flying a published pairing. There is more but as our own MEC chair is quoted as saying, you and I are probably "Insulated from the fallout." All that is left to do is move on and start educating the membership for the rouge wide body expansion request that is sure to show up in 3 years and the whipsaw attempt between rouge at 80+ fins and the rest of the mainline.

-JH

P.S. If you truly don't care if anything else was gained, then imagine what we could have done if we all worked to CARS. Bet we could have gotten the new hires onto the over funded DB pension then ... Dare to dream. Maybe in 3 years...



Top
   
 Post subject: Re: New TA?
PostPosted: Thu Sep 14, 2017 6:34 pm 
Offline
Rank 0
Rank 0

Joined: Tue Sep 06, 2016 8:17 pm
Posts: 14
Yeah a great deal.... :roll:

You don't put a bunch of management wannabes on the ACPA negotiating team and expect to get a good deal.......AC is making the most money it has ever made, Pilot shortage is an actual thing, and we are still taking concessions for a shitty gain.....the new DC pension ain't worth shit. This place is gonna make West Jet's working conditions look awesome within 2 years.



Top
   
 Post subject: Re: New TA?
PostPosted: Thu Sep 14, 2017 6:37 pm 
Offline
Top Poster
Top Poster

Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 7:10 am
Posts: 7249
Dare to dream indeed. If anybody harbours any delusion that the growing number of DC pilots will ever get our DB plan they need to go hide somewhere and reassess reality. Their plan needed fixing and this was the time to do some of it. Also don't forget that this was a reopener, not a contract negotiation. At the best of times a strike is the only leverage ACPA has (insert big hearty laugh here), and we don't even have that for how many more years?

AC didn't have to give us the time of day.



Top
   
 Post subject: Re: New TA?
PostPosted: Thu Sep 14, 2017 6:51 pm 
Offline
Rank 2
Rank 2

Joined: Wed Jan 09, 2008 2:46 pm
Posts: 77
livinlife wrote:
Yeah a great deal.... :roll:

You don't put a bunch of management wannabes on the ACPA negotiating team and expect to get a good deal.......AC is making the most money it has ever made, Pilot shortage is an actual thing, and we are still taking concessions for a shitty gain.....the new DC pension ain't worth shit. This place is gonna make West Jet's working conditions look awesome within 2 years.


You do realize the new pension isn't a DC pension right?



Top
   
 Post subject: Re: New TA?
PostPosted: Fri Sep 15, 2017 7:29 am 
Offline
Rank 4
Rank 4

Joined: Thu Oct 30, 2008 8:15 am
Posts: 239
Location: Near YOW
livinlife wrote:
Yeah a great deal.... :roll:

You don't put a bunch of management wannabes on the ACPA negotiating team and expect to get a good deal.......AC is making the most money it has ever made, Pilot shortage is an actual thing, and we are still taking concessions for a shitty gain.....the new DC pension ain't worth shit. This place is gonna make West Jet's working conditions look awesome within 2 years.



Just so you know there are many of us that completely disagree with you!



Top
   
 Post subject: Re: New TA?
PostPosted: Fri Sep 15, 2017 7:40 am 
Offline
Rank 1
Rank 1

Joined: Sat Feb 16, 2013 11:42 pm
Posts: 22
Can anybody ELI5 (explain like I'm 5) the consequences of Rouge expansion? I heard someone mention it will mean more days worked per month to NB pilots. I guess I don't understand the differences between Mainline and Rouge very well.


Top
   
 Post subject: Re: New TA?
PostPosted: Fri Sep 15, 2017 7:59 am 
Offline
Rank (9)
Rank (9)

Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 12:10 pm
Posts: 1489
ActionAxson wrote:
Can anybody ELI5 (explain like I'm 5) the consequences of Rouge expansion? I heard someone mention it will mean more days worked per month to NB pilots. I guess I don't understand the differences between Mainline and Rouge very well.


Some Rouge flying is growth flying but thus far the majority is substitution for mainline flying.

Rouge is B scale pay. Rouge is B scale work rules.

It takes less pilots to do the Rouge schedule under LOU74 than it would under mainline rules so growth is partially offset by efficiency.

Separating Rouge flying from mainline shrinks the pool of flying on specific equipment that is available for monthly bidding.



Top
   
 Post subject: Re: New TA?
PostPosted: Fri Sep 15, 2017 8:56 am 
Offline
Rank 2
Rank 2

Joined: Mon May 08, 2006 11:48 am
Posts: 70
So essentially, this TA allows Rouge to grow at the expense of Mainline NB flying?

When you put it that way it doesn't sound good at all, but obviously there is more to it than that.



Top
   
 Post subject: Re: New TA?
PostPosted: Fri Sep 15, 2017 8:56 am 
Offline
Rank (9)
Rank (9)
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 29, 2007 7:04 am
Posts: 1659
rudder wrote:
ActionAxson wrote:
Can anybody ELI5 (explain like I'm 5) the consequences of Rouge expansion? I heard someone mention it will mean more days worked per month to NB pilots. I guess I don't understand the differences between Mainline and Rouge very well.


Some Rouge flying is growth flying but thus far the majority is substitution for mainline flying.

Rouge is B scale pay. Rouge is B scale work rules.

It takes less pilots to do the Rouge schedule under LOU74 than it would under mainline rules so growth is partially offset by efficiency.

Separating Rouge flying from mainline shrinks the pool of flying on specific equipment that is available for monthly bidding.


Question (as a point of interest) and if you don't mind. I understand Rouge fleet is A319/20 and B767 so if you fly those types at mainline can you bid on Rouge per month or does he/she have to stay at Rouge for a period of time.



Top
   
 Post subject: Re: New TA?
PostPosted: Fri Sep 15, 2017 9:10 am 
Offline
Rank (9)
Rank (9)

Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 12:10 pm
Posts: 1489
Spruce Moose wrote:
So essentially, this TA allows Rouge to grow at the expense of Mainline NB flying?

When you put it that way it doesn't sound good at all, but obviously there is more to it than that.


CR and BS would probably like to see Rouge on any route that can support A319 or larger that does not require J-class inventory. That now includes RRA routes.

That is a lot of flying (think of every North American and sun destination leisure route and many overseas routes that are primarily tourism driven).

Rouge represents labour cost savings, pure and simple.



Top
   
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 77 posts ]  Go to page 1 2 3 4 Next

All times are UTC-07:00


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Adam Oke, avcraig, Cap'n P8, Maple_30, ram, Rowdy, ToolShed, Victory and 48 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited
[ GZIP: Off ]

For questions/comments please send them to
avcanada@gmail.com


AvCanada Topsites List
AVIATION TOP 100 - www.avitop.com Avitop.com

While the administrators and moderators of this forum will attempt to remove or edit any generally objectionable material as quickly as possible, it is impossible to review every message. If you feel a topic or post is inappropriate email us at avcanada@gmail.com .  By reading these forums you acknowledge that all posts made to these forums express the views and opinions of the author and not the administrators, moderators or webmaster (except for posts by these people) and hence will not be held liable. This website is not responsible or liable in any way for any false or misleading messages or job ads placed at our site. 

Use AvCanada's information at your own risk!

We reserve the right to remove any messages that we deem unacceptable.
When you post a message, your IP is logged and may be provided to concerned parties where unethical or illegal behavior is apparent. All rights reserved.