Air Canada Tokyo Incident

This forum has been developed to discuss aviation related topics.

Moderators: sky's the limit, sepia, Sulako, lilfssister, North Shore, I WAS Birddog

C.W.E.
Rank (9)
Rank (9)
Posts: 1262
Joined: Mon Dec 18, 2017 2:22 pm

Re: Air Canada Tokyo Incident

Post by C.W.E. »

"1964" "busy"
In 1964 O'hare was one of the worlds busiest airports and I was answering this question.

How much time do you have taxiing around busy airports, CWE?
In 1964 O'hare was very busy at times and it could be quite a chore keeping up to a line of DC8's and B707's at their taxi speed flying single pilot in a B18.

Have you tried to mix with big jets on the taxiways at O'hare flying a B18 single pilot?

The longest taxiway I have used was 15,500 feet long at FVHA, so you had lots of room to fast taxi if you wished.
---------- ADS -----------
 
User avatar
Jean-Pierre
Rank 5
Rank 5
Posts: 390
Joined: Sun Oct 04, 2009 4:56 pm

Re: Air Canada Tokyo Incident

Post by Jean-Pierre »

In 1973 I weaved a B18 through the landing gear strut of 747s like a slalom course. Sorry for them I was now number 1 for takeoff.
---------- ADS -----------
 
User avatar
Jack Klumpus
Rank 5
Rank 5
Posts: 379
Joined: Fri Jan 29, 2010 4:46 pm
Location: In a van down by the river.

Re: Air Canada Tokyo Incident

Post by Jack Klumpus »

Not a 787 pilot, however I imagine their moving map is similar to the one I use. You can edit the Map, and one of the functions is to insert a Cross on closed runways, taxiways. This serves a few purposes:

- something to do while in flight
- to remind us after the 12 hour flight which taxiways are closed

Yes we have millions of NOTAMS, and it sucks going through them, but you dont need to look at the taxiway closures at Tashkent, Uzbekistan, (Unless its being used for a driftdown or emergency enroute airport), however, at least have a thorough look at your Departure, Arrival, and Alternate airports. While enroute, it can kill a few minutes by checking out the nearest usable airports, seeing if they infact are usable, etc.

We all make mistakes, but let's try and mitigate those threats.
---------- ADS -----------
 
When I retire, I’ll miss the clowns, not the circus.
altiplano
Top Poster
Top Poster
Posts: 5382
Joined: Sat Jan 22, 2005 2:24 pm

Re: Air Canada Tokyo Incident

Post by altiplano »

Doesn't seem so cut and dry...

http://avherald.com/h?article=4bbbea30&opt=0
---------- ADS -----------
 
Victory
Rank 6
Rank 6
Posts: 466
Joined: Tue Sep 19, 2017 8:32 am

Re: Air Canada Tokyo Incident

Post by Victory »

It was already mentioned by pelmet above that this taxiway wasn't on any chart and not in the NOTAMs. It's hard for you guys to change your mind once you've already decided on something.
---------- ADS -----------
 
pelmet
Top Poster
Top Poster
Posts: 7157
Joined: Tue Jun 14, 2005 2:48 pm

Re: Air Canada Tokyo Incident

Post by pelmet »

Victory wrote: Tue Jul 31, 2018 3:04 am It was already mentioned by pelmet above that this taxiway wasn't on any chart and not in the NOTAMs. It's hard for you guys to change your mind once you've already decided on something.

It is a perfect example of some of the 'Gotcha's" out there. They exist. We don't know what they might be except that it will be something unexpected. This one was an incident waiting to happen.

But once again, that doesn't mean that there isn't something to learn from it. Nobody else ended up on this taxiway and probably wasn't paved just yesterday. Should you look for a taxiway sign name before you go onto a taxiway? After all, there are old, closed taxiways that may not be marked. Are you one of those guys exiting at such a high speed that it feels more like a swerve and most of your concentration is focused on slowing down and maintaining control instead of exiting at a reasonable speed and scanning around at which point the very close by, actual high speed exit will be seen. Do the paint markings make sense? Do you use the yellow centerline stripe as a reference or the centerline lights?


As a note of interest, there was a lot of controversy about this airport when it was built and the farming land that was used up. Many farmers refused at the time to sell but the government went ahead and opened the airport, initially with one, long runway. It took a long time for the second runway to be built but it was, in sections over time as farmers slowly sold their land. It wasn't until enough pieces of land were sold that the sections of runway could be connected and finally opened. There is still a section of land south of the threshold of 34R that is an active farm. if you use google earth to zoom into the airport and look in this area, you can see the farm just south of the runway and a section of runway south of the farm with a high-speed exit already built and waiting to be connected to the main body of the runway when this farmer finally sells out. It laso explains the curve in the parallelt taxiway near the threshold of runway 34R. They built the airport around the farms.
---------- ADS -----------
 
User avatar
Xander
Rank 4
Rank 4
Posts: 207
Joined: Sun Jul 11, 2010 2:01 pm

Re: Air Canada Tokyo Incident

Post by Xander »

---------- ADS -----------
 
The trouble with my life is that I do not think I am cut out to sit behind a desk.
Rockie
Top Poster
Top Poster
Posts: 8433
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 7:10 am

Re: Air Canada Tokyo Incident

Post by Rockie »

pelmet wrote: Mon Jul 30, 2018 1:27 pm Rockie could provide some more info but he may have been quietly told by his employer to stop embarrassing them and no longer post on company incidents.
I don't know anything about this incident, and when have I ever provided information or even an opinion on any incident regardless of who it is before the facts are known? Speculating is a pointless mugs game.
---------- ADS -----------
 
User avatar
complexintentions
Rank 10
Rank 10
Posts: 2183
Joined: Thu Aug 19, 2004 3:49 pm
Location: of my pants is unknown.

Re: Air Canada Tokyo Incident

Post by complexintentions »

The moving map is not used as a reference as to which high-speed exit one is going to use during the landing roll. :roll:

They misidentified the exit and took the wrong one.

Embarrassing.

Not fatal.

Has happened to every airline.

This is the state of aviation now, that we have to create drama where it doesn't exist. Like Facebook.

Why I barely look at AvCanada anymore.
---------- ADS -----------
 
I’m still waiting for my white male privilege membership card. Must have gotten lost in the mail.
C.W.E.
Rank (9)
Rank (9)
Posts: 1262
Joined: Mon Dec 18, 2017 2:22 pm

Re: Air Canada Tokyo Incident

Post by C.W.E. »

For sure it can happen to anyone but fortunately it does not injure or kill anyone.
---------- ADS -----------
 
Jet Jockey
Rank 5
Rank 5
Posts: 368
Joined: Sun Sep 22, 2013 8:42 am
Location: CYUL

Re: Air Canada Tokyo Incident

Post by Jet Jockey »

Shit happens... Everyone can learn something about the incident when they complete the investigation.

I'm wondering why no temporary red lights were not installed to avoid something like this.
---------- ADS -----------
 
User avatar
98 Corolla
Rank 2
Rank 2
Posts: 87
Joined: Wed Jan 10, 2018 10:26 am

Re: Air Canada Tokyo Incident

Post by 98 Corolla »

My first time in Narita I noticed some green taxiways and thought it was some new type of material they were using instead of concrete. Upon closer inspection they weren't in very good condition and that is when I realized they were under construction and painted green to look like infield (in a shade not very similar to grass). It's an interesting idea aesthetically but not very intuitive. After all most people don't associate green with stop.
---------- ADS -----------
 
User avatar
HansDietrich
Rank 6
Rank 6
Posts: 453
Joined: Sun Feb 07, 2016 9:33 am

Re: Air Canada Tokyo Incident

Post by HansDietrich »

No doubt NOTAMS are a little outdated and sometimes overwhelming, but sh*t, for 200K + a year, an AC 787 captain makes, he (or she) better recite them like a poem, before they land at the destination. With all that being said, I'll wait and see what the actual report will say (if there will ever be one available to the public). Things are not always as "initially reported". There are many factors here.
---------- ADS -----------
 
Das ist mir wurst...
User avatar
Bede
Rank 11
Rank 11
Posts: 4432
Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2004 5:52 am

Re: Air Canada Tokyo Incident

Post by Bede »

HansDietrich wrote: Tue Jul 31, 2018 5:41 pm No doubt NOTAMS are a little outdated and sometimes overwhelming, but sh*t, for 200K + a year, an AC 787 captain makes, he (or she) better recite them like a poem, before they land at the destination.
Hans,

You've already established your ignorance on this forum. Just stop posting.
---------- ADS -----------
 
User avatar
JohnnyHotRocks
Rank (9)
Rank (9)
Posts: 1084
Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 7:18 am

Re: Air Canada Tokyo Incident

Post by JohnnyHotRocks »

So if you make $100,000 you should only look at half the notams?
---------- ADS -----------
 
User avatar
HansDietrich
Rank 6
Rank 6
Posts: 453
Joined: Sun Feb 07, 2016 9:33 am

Re: Air Canada Tokyo Incident

Post by HansDietrich »

Bede wrote: Tue Jul 31, 2018 6:19 pm
HansDietrich wrote: Tue Jul 31, 2018 5:41 pm No doubt NOTAMS are a little outdated and sometimes overwhelming, but sh*t, for 200K + a year, an AC 787 captain makes, he (or she) better recite them like a poem, before they land at the destination.
Hans,

You've already established your ignorance on this forum. Just stop posting.
I think you need to read between the lines here. I'm sure you can. Just give it a try. Let me put it to you in words that you may understand. Clearly, sarcasm is not your forte. You must be the life of a party, wherever you go.

What I meant by my SARCASTIC comment, is that "...At their level of experience, these small, yet important details should not be missed, confused or accidentally omitted."

Get a life man, you need to relax a bit.
---------- ADS -----------
 
Das ist mir wurst...
User avatar
HansDietrich
Rank 6
Rank 6
Posts: 453
Joined: Sun Feb 07, 2016 9:33 am

Re: Air Canada Tokyo Incident

Post by HansDietrich »

JohnnyHotRocks wrote: Tue Jul 31, 2018 7:14 pm So if you make $100,000 you should only look at half the notams?
If that's what you got from my post, let's go with it. What the hell... it's the internet!
---------- ADS -----------
 
Das ist mir wurst...
User avatar
Bede
Rank 11
Rank 11
Posts: 4432
Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2004 5:52 am

Re: Air Canada Tokyo Incident

Post by Bede »

Hans,

It appears that you don't understand what sarcasm is. The rhetorical device that you used is overstatement.

#lifeoftheparty
---------- ADS -----------
 
NotDirty!
Rank 7
Rank 7
Posts: 554
Joined: Wed May 21, 2014 4:04 pm

Re: Air Canada Tokyo Incident

Post by NotDirty! »

HansDietrich wrote: Tue Jul 31, 2018 5:41 pm No doubt NOTAMS are a little outdated and sometimes overwhelming, but sh*t, for 200K + a year, an AC 787 captain makes, he (or she) better recite them like a poem, before they land at the destination. With all that being said, I'll wait and see what the actual report will say (if there will ever be one available to the public). Things are not always as "initially reported". There are many factors here.
Regardless of how much you get paid, it is awfully hard to read a NOTAM that doesn’t exist.
---------- ADS -----------
 
altiplano
Top Poster
Top Poster
Posts: 5382
Joined: Sat Jan 22, 2005 2:24 pm

Re: Air Canada Tokyo Incident

Post by altiplano »

No notam, no signage, not depicted on the chart.

I can see how it happened, you see on the chart that you need to take the first right after B5, you go past B5 and there is a high-speed to the right, with the end of the runway approaching quickly.
It probably has a B7 sign right next to it on the far side too.
Probably seemed about right after a 14 or 15 hour day.
From the aerial photo it appears no taxi lead out lines from the runway to B7, just a little further along.

They made a mistake, they stopped, they got help, it inconvenienced some people... glad it wasn't me.
---------- ADS -----------
 
Post Reply

Return to “General Comments”