WestJet off to Hawaii

This forum has been developed to discuss aviation related topics.

Moderators: sky's the limit, sepia, Sulako, lilfssister, North Shore, I WAS Birddog

Airbrake
Rank 4
Rank 4
Posts: 248
Joined: Thu Jan 13, 2005 2:50 pm

WestJet off to Hawaii

Post by Airbrake »

http://www.ccnmatthews.com/news/release ... For=555830


Press Releases/Communiqués de presse

FOR: WESTJET

TSX SYMBOL: WJA
Aloha! WestJet Announces All-Jet Service to Honolulu and Maui


SEPTEMBER 20, 2005 - 10:00:02 ET
CALGARY, ALBERTA--(CCNMatthews - Sept. 20, 2005) -

Airline Will Offer Five Flights a Week to Honolulu Starting December 9,
2005 and Two Flights a Week to Maui Starting December 17, 2005

WestJet (TSX:WJA) today announced it will begin offering non-stop
service to the new markets of Honolulu and Maui, Hawaii. This new
schedule also offers connecting flights to several other WestJet
destinations across North America. Seats are available for sale
immediately.

Following are the schedule details of the non-stop Hawaii service
WestJet will offer:

/T/

Vancouver to Honolulu (starting December 9(1))
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Departure Arrival Days
------------------------------------------------------------------------
7 p.m. 10:58 p.m. Monday, Tuesday, Thursday, Friday and Sunday
------------------------------------------------------------------------

Honolulu to Vancouver
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Departure Arrival Days
------------------------------------------------------------------------
11:58 p.m. 7:50 a.m. Monday, Tuesday, Thursday, Friday and Sunday
------------------------------------------------------------------------
(1) From December 9 - 16, 2005, WestJet will operate a daily flight
between Vancouver and Honolulu at the times listed above.

Vancouver to Maui (starting December 17)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Departure Arrival Days
------------------------------------------------------------------------
7 p.m. 10:53 p.m. Wednesday and Saturday
------------------------------------------------

------------------------

Maui to Vancouver (starting December 17)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Departure Arrival Days
------------------------------------------------------------------------
11:53 p.m. 7:31 a.m. Wednesday and Saturday
------------------------------------------------------------------------

/T/

"WestJet is absolutely thrilled to be announcing non-stop flights
to Hawaii," said Sean Durfy, WestJet's Executive Vice-President of
Marketing and Sales. "Hawaii is one of the destinations that our
loyal guests and dedicated WestJetters have been asking us to serve for
several years. With our convenient schedule, reasonable fares and brand
new Boeing Next-Generation 737-800 jets equipped with leather seats and
more legroom, I am confident that guests won't hesitate to choose
WestJet when travelling to the beautiful Hawaiian Islands."

WestJet is Canada's leading low-cost airline currently offering
scheduled service throughout its 34-city North American network. Named
Canada's most respected corporation for customer service in 2005,
WestJet pioneered low-cost high-value flying in Canada. With increased
legroom and leather seats on its modern fleet of Boeing Next-Generation
737 aircraft, and live seatback television provided by Bell ExpressVu on
its 737-700 fleet, WestJet strives to be the number one choice for
travellers.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION PLEASE CONTACT:WestJetMedia Relations:Gillian Bentley(403) 444-2615Website: http://www.westjet.com
---------- ADS -----------
 
ei ei owe
Rank 8
Rank 8
Posts: 793
Joined: Sun Mar 06, 2005 1:39 am
Location: getting closer to home

Post by ei ei owe »

They just can't be happy enough staying where they should. Here they go over the ocean. What's next? WJ to London?

Could this spark international low fare wars with AC?
---------- ADS -----------
 
Everything comes in threes....
User avatar
twinpratts
Rank (9)
Rank (9)
Posts: 1613
Joined: Tue Feb 17, 2004 5:38 am
Location: The Wild Wild West.
Contact:

Post by twinpratts »

OH YEAH!!! 8)
---------- ADS -----------
 
I want to die like my grandfather did, peacefully in his sleep. Not screaming in terror like his passengers...
SkyKing
Rank 3
Rank 3
Posts: 101
Joined: Wed Sep 22, 2004 6:31 pm
Location: CYYC

Post by SkyKing »

YESSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS!
---------- ADS -----------
 
Hedley
Top Poster
Top Poster
Posts: 10430
Joined: Thu May 27, 2004 6:40 am
Location: CYSH
Contact:

Post by Hedley »

Where's Blastor? Rebel?
---------- ADS -----------
 
redbeard
Rank 1
Rank 1
Posts: 19
Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 6:06 pm
Contact:

Post by redbeard »

after years of doing things right, they now want to go broke
---------- ADS -----------
 
PPP
Rank 2
Rank 2
Posts: 90
Joined: Sat Sep 11, 2004 3:10 pm

Post by PPP »

It should be a good run, They just want to Fuk with AC even more on international runs.
---------- ADS -----------
 
EI-EIO
Rank 7
Rank 7
Posts: 604
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 1:16 pm
Location: Toronto, ON
Contact:

Post by EI-EIO »

4400km in a 738 rather than a 757 or 767 - let's see what the public thinks!
---------- ADS -----------
 
desksgo
Rank 10
Rank 10
Posts: 2850
Joined: Thu Feb 19, 2004 12:05 pm
Location: Toy Poodle Town, Manitoba
Contact:

Post by desksgo »

The Canadian public thinks that if there's a fare of 100 bucks going to Hawaii, they'll sit in a wooden crate.
---------- ADS -----------
 
xkbal
Rank 1
Rank 1
Posts: 32
Joined: Sun May 15, 2005 8:12 am

Post by xkbal »

EI-EIO wrote:4400km in a 738 rather than a 757 or 767 - let's see what the public thinks!
While the 767 may be nicer due to the wide body as I understand it the 757 and the 737 have the same fuselage cross section and cruise within about 20 mph of each other (.78 vs. .80) so I don't see that much difference. If you're talking about individual airline seat configs/service/etc. that's different but otherwise not much to choose between the 57 and 37 from the average pax point of view.
---------- ADS -----------
 
User avatar
Axial Flow
Rank 7
Rank 7
Posts: 507
Joined: Wed Feb 25, 2004 6:00 pm

Post by Axial Flow »

Personally as long as the seat pitch is not like a sardine can (Royal/C3) I care less what I am sitting in.
---------- ADS -----------
 
grammar boy
Rank 3
Rank 3
Posts: 143
Joined: Mon Jul 04, 2005 7:53 pm

Post by grammar boy »

EI-EIO wrote:4400km in a 738 rather than a 757 or 767 - let's see what the public thinks!
Yeah, I'd rather have a 28" pitch for 6 hours on a 227 seat single aisle 757 (like C3/Royal/AT used to have) than a 34" pitch on a 738... I've been on all three of their 757s and had my knees at my throat for the whole time (I'm 5'11, hardly huge).

As for the 767, dual aisle perception does make a difference, I'll give you that one...
---------- ADS -----------
 
WJflyer
Rank 8
Rank 8
Posts: 912
Joined: Tue Aug 23, 2005 1:08 pm
Location: CYVR/CYYZ

Post by WJflyer »

Won't Westjet be load-restricted on the out runs? They will be travelling against the jet stream, and unless Westjet load-restricts or installs cargo fuel tanks, I don't see them as capable of taking a full passenger load plus their baggage, unless Westjet is flying the HGW version of the -700's (the -800's are really going to cut it close, with almost no room for error if Westjet is flying the HGW variant). They can probally take a full load back, as they have the jetstream with them on return to YVR. From YVR to HNL, it is 2351nm or 4354 km, and the 737-700 HGW can take 126 pax and has a range of 3260nm or 6037km. The 737-800 HGW can go 2940nm or 5445km, carrying 162 pax. Add in prevaling winds, and Westjet is cutting it close, for either birds. And don't get me started on YVR - OGG, as that is 4301 km.
---------- ADS -----------
 
bcflyer
Rank (9)
Rank (9)
Posts: 1305
Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2004 8:35 am
Location: Canada

Post by bcflyer »

I'm not positive but I think Aloha was load restricted out of YVR some days and had to make a tech stop a few times for fuel during the winter. I'm sure the powers that be have researched this extensively before making the plunge.
Hey leftyxl, you lucky dog, overnights in Hawaii huh? Sure beats Attiwapiskat. Might even be as much fun as Nashville!! :D
---------- ADS -----------
 
The Hammer
Rank 6
Rank 6
Posts: 437
Joined: Tue Mar 16, 2004 6:46 am

Post by The Hammer »

Overnights are U kidding?? you can easily fly to YVR-HNL-YVR in 14 hrs :shock:
---------- ADS -----------
 
User avatar
greenwich
Rank 6
Rank 6
Posts: 455
Joined: Mon Mar 15, 2004 10:17 pm

Post by greenwich »

SkyKing wrote:YESSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS!
I second that:

YESSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS


G
---------- ADS -----------
 
"Slow and steady wins the race"
WJflyer
Rank 8
Rank 8
Posts: 912
Joined: Tue Aug 23, 2005 1:08 pm
Location: CYVR/CYYZ

Post by WJflyer »

So, is there any news of Westjet installing cargo hold fuel tanks, a la BBJ? Should be a straight foward conversion and back, as needed, and will provide a good margin of error.
---------- ADS -----------
 
User avatar
Airtids
Rank (9)
Rank (9)
Posts: 1643
Joined: Sat Feb 21, 2004 12:56 am
Location: The Rock

Post by Airtids »

ei ei owe wrote:They just can't be happy enough staying where they should. Here they go over the ocean. What's next? WJ to London?

Could this spark international low fare wars with AC?
From what I understand from a few on the inside, next stop is Ireland. ETOPS is a marvelous thing.
---------- ADS -----------
 
Aviation- the hardest way possible to make an easy living!
"You can bomb the world to pieces, but you can't bomb it into peace!" Michael Franti- Spearhead
"Trust everyone, but cut the cards". My Grandma.
WJflyer
Rank 8
Rank 8
Posts: 912
Joined: Tue Aug 23, 2005 1:08 pm
Location: CYVR/CYYZ

Post by WJflyer »

Airtids wrote:
ei ei owe wrote:They just can't be happy enough staying where they should. Here they go over the ocean. What's next? WJ to London?

Could this spark international low fare wars with AC?
From what I understand from a few on the inside, next stop is Ireland. ETOPS is a marvelous thing.
I am betting that Westjet is thinking about doing some mods to a selection of their fleet by installing extra fuel tanks in the cargo hold. Doesn't PrivatAir operate a fleet of Boeing Buisness Jets and Airbus Corporate Jets that have cargo hold fuel tanks, giving them Trans-Atlantic range? This will allow Westjet to fly as far as Germany.
---------- ADS -----------
 
Rebel
Rank (9)
Rank (9)
Posts: 1552
Joined: Sun Feb 15, 2004 8:43 pm

Post by Rebel »

WJflyer wrote:
I am betting that Westjet is thinking about doing some mods to a selection of their fleet by installing extra fuel tanks in the cargo hold. Doesn't PrivatAir operate a fleet of Boeing Buisness Jets and Airbus Corporate Jets that have cargo hold fuel tanks, giving them Trans-Atlantic range? This will allow Westjet to fly as far as Germany.
Hmm I can’t see a LCC installing extra fuel tanks in a light twin as it cuts into the payload and flexibility of their aircraft. The folks that do operate in this dedicated configuration charge their passengers a hefty extra premium and that’s not exactly the business plan of a successful LLC.

However from a pilots perspective its a great idea as it helps minimize the pucker effect unfortunately the bean counters think differently.
---------- ADS -----------
 
Post Reply

Return to “General Comments”