Horizontal Stabilizer Failure

This forum has been developed to discuss flight instruction/University and College programs.

Moderators: lilfssister, North Shore, sky's the limit, sepia, Sulako, Right Seat Captain

Post Reply
User avatar
sherryfly
Rank 1
Rank 1
Posts: 38
Joined: Wed Jan 16, 2019 3:48 pm

Horizontal Stabilizer Failure

Post by sherryfly »

Hello,

In the event of a complete failure of the horizontal stabilizer (such as Alaska 261) what options do the crew have to maintain flight, or land the aircraft? Is there any way or procedure to keep the aircraft stable?

As always,
Thanks for your input!
---------- ADS -----------
 
nwopilot
Rank 2
Rank 2
Posts: 65
Joined: Sun Jan 01, 2012 7:05 pm

Re: Horizontal Stabilizer Failure

Post by nwopilot »

YOU NEED TO ROLL IT!

-Denzel Washington, 2012
---------- ADS -----------
 
User avatar
sherryfly
Rank 1
Rank 1
Posts: 38
Joined: Wed Jan 16, 2019 3:48 pm

Re: Horizontal Stabilizer Failure

Post by sherryfly »

Would a commercial aircraft maintain level flight while inverted? I was thinking perhaps trimming could help negate some of the effects of the jammed stabilizer, however I have never actually flown an aircraft so im not sure how effective that would be.
---------- ADS -----------
 
User avatar
PilotDAR
Rank 11
Rank 11
Posts: 4113
Joined: Sun Sep 30, 2012 6:46 pm
Location: Near CNJ4 Orillia, Ontario

Re: Horizontal Stabilizer Failure

Post by PilotDAR »

The questions has many "depends" in the answer. If it is simply a loss of elevator or stabilator control, but everything is there, and nothing is jammed, A later certificaion basis (mid '70's or later design plane) will include a procedure for landing without elevator control. This will be a combination of trim and power, but no elevator. providing this procedure satisfies the following certification requirement:
Sec. 23.145

Longitudinal control.

.......................
(e) It must be possible, by using the normal flight and power controls except the primary longitudinal control, to control the descent of the airplane to a zero rate of descent and to an attitude suitable for a controlled landing, without exceptional piloting skill, alertness, or strength, and without exceeding the operational and structural limitations of the airplane.
If a part of the pitch control system is missing or jammed, that is not applicable.

If the plane is certified to the earlier CAR 3 requirement, which predated Part 23, this requirement is not applicable in CAR 3, so the plane may not have a procedure published.

The CAR 3 1Cessna 172N, as an example, does have a procedure published for this. I've tried it, it's not easy. I would suggest that anyone who needed to do this plan to land on a pavement/concrete runway, certainly not grass, so that a poor landing will not result in the plane digging in, and flipping over - you'd rather slide, that roll into a ball.

A mentor of mine told me that he once had to land with no elevator control in a Lake Amphibian. The elevator pushrod had been in bilge water in winter cruise flight, and froze during the flight. He was able to land on the trim only, though Lakes have a different trim, it's not a tab, but rather a separate little elevator, hydraulically controlled. Still not easy to do!
---------- ADS -----------
 
lhalliday
Rank 4
Rank 4
Posts: 261
Joined: Sun Dec 06, 2015 5:30 pm

Re: Horizontal Stabilizer Failure

Post by lhalliday »

The issue with Alaska 261 was that the stabilizer failed in the full-down position. Not much the crew could do about it.

United 232 landed (sort of...) with no elevator or rudder, just engine thrust.

...laura
---------- ADS -----------
 
Post Reply

Return to “Flight Training”