The summary provided links to a Portuguese court ruling, in Portuguese. The other links are either dead or point to other summaries, and somehow I doubt you speak Portuguese (Russian, perhaps, but not I think Portuguese.)blasted off wrote: ↑Fri Jul 02, 2021 6:58 pm https://www.expatica.com/pt/news/lisbon ... id-100196/
Lisbon court rules only 0.9% of ‘verified cases’ actually died of Covid
Published on June 28, 2021
Following a citizen’s petition, a Lisbon court was forced to provide verified Covid-19 mortality data. According to the ruling, the number of verified Covid-19 deaths from January 2020 to April 2021 is only 152, not the 17,000 as claimed by government ministries.
All the “others” died for various reasons, although their PCR test was positive.
If this is "evidence" to you, you have no idea what evidence is. You are either looking for whatever confirms your already established opinion, or deliberately sowing discord.
The idea that there are people who think this is credible and notable evidence does not bode well for humanity. In the interest of transparency, however, I will provide an (unverified) translation:
The questions that were asked were very obviously designed to produce the result they were looking for:Someone on the Internet wrote: A group of citizens made available online the judgment of the Administrative Court of the Circle of Lisbon, of 19-5-2021 , on the process aimed at providing information by the Directorate-General for Health (DGS) and Ministry of Health (MS) of the number of deaths by Covid-19 autopsied and measured by PCR testing since the beginning of the pandemic and scientific studies on which this entity relied to impose measures and make recommendations.
The DGS invoked the applicants' illegitimacy to deny them the information, but during the process it was forced to grant it.
However, virtually all requests were left unanswered (15 out of 17) relating to scientific evidence of the measures of peer-reviewed studies, allegedly because "none of the documents, reports, evidence and information requested (...) are in possession of the DGS” , can be read on the first page of the sentence.
Briefly, unanswered requests for alleged lack of documents in the possession of DGS have to do with: mapping of the genetic code and infection of SARS-Cov-2, RT-PCR test as a means of diagnosis and amplification cycles, transmission of infection by asymptomatic, distinction from the common flu, confinement, social distance, masks and vaccines.
The answered requests, allegedly the only ones in the possession of DGS, were only items l) in), respectively, “Information/report on the number of deaths in Portugal, since the beginning of the declared pandemic, caused by SARS-Cov2 infection, having the cause of death was objectively and legally determined by autopsy of cadavers" and "Information/report on the number of deaths in Portugal, since the beginning of the declared pandemic, caused by SARS-Cov2 infection, with the cause of death being solely measured by means of the PCR test”. These responses were as follows:
"After analyzing SICO's replica base from 01-01-2020 to 18-04-2021, we were able to ascertain the following distributions so far:
Between 2020 and 2021, 152 death certificates were issued by doctors working for the Ministry of Justice (INMLCF) whose basic cause of death was due to COVID 19 according to the following distribution:
Of the 152 death certificates, 132 deaths the underlying cause was U071 (COVID 19-identified virus) and 20 deaths the underlying cause was U072 (COVID 19 -not identified in the laboratory).
Of the 152 death certificates, autopsy was not required for 148 deaths, with 129 deaths being the underlying cause of death U071 and 19 deaths the underlying cause of [sic] death was U072.
Of the 152 deaths, 4 deaths were not exempted from the autopsy, with 3 deaths being the underlying cause of death U071 and 1 death the underlying cause being U072.” ,
can be read in the document , which cites the response, dated 19-4-2021, by the Government bodies summoned by the records.
From the silver information on the only 152 deaths certified by Covid-19 between January 2020 and May 2021 - either by declaration of the doctors of the National Institute of Legal Medicine and Forensic Sciences (INMLCF) or after an autopsy -, that the MS it needs to reform its operational and administrative procedures for recording and reporting deaths from this disease . Otherwise, it is subject to questioning the official numbers that the DGS releases without the necessary administrative certification.
The same in relation to data not provided from scientific studies, more than a year after the application of unprecedented restrictions , which may lead citizens to question the narratives, conveyed by the political power, appointed experts and systemic media, allegedly based on science.
The sentence determined the extinction of the instance, since the defendant had already responded with those data and no longer had it in his possession, and for "impossibility and futility of the dispute" imputed to the MS and the DGS, including the totality of the court costs of the process.
In other words, of 17,000 suspected Covid deaths, only 152 were autopsied. Autopsies are only ever done in A) suspicious circumstances, or B) where the cause of death is unknown. My mother wasn't autopsied either - but trust me, it was cancer.Someone on the Internet wrote: The answered requests, allegedly the only ones in the possession of DGS, were only items l) in), respectively, “Information/report on the number of deaths in Portugal, since the beginning of the declared pandemic, caused by SARS-Cov2 infection, having the cause of death was objectively and legally determined by autopsy of cadavers" and "Information/report on the number of deaths in Portugal, since the beginning of the declared pandemic, caused by SARS-Cov2 infection, with the cause of death being solely measured by means of the PCR test”.
The article is absolutely NOT saying that only 152 people died of Covid. It's saying that only 152 of those suspected Covid deaths were verified by autopsy. Next time, at least read the fucking article before spouting it as evidence of a a massive global conspiracy, and don't assume that everybody here lacks the motive and intellect to find and understand a translation.
No, they didn't. You assumed that, because you couldn't be bothered to fully understand what you were reading. The title of "Lisbon court rules only 0.9% of ‘verified cases’ actually died of Covid" is pure, unadulterated, bullshit clickbait, if not an outright lie. But yanno, keep interpreting the numbers to fit whatever narrative you choose to believe.blasted off wrote: ↑Fri Jul 02, 2021 6:58 pm All the “others” died for various reasons, although their PCR test was positive.
Sometimes I weep for humanity.
