https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/20 ... ce-boros
Seven anti-vaccine doctors fell sick after gathering earlier this month for a Florida “summit” at which alternative treatments for Covid-19 were discussed.

Seven anti-vaccine doctors fell sick after gathering earlier this month for a Florida “summit” at which alternative treatments for Covid-19 were discussed.
Well here in BC unvaccinated people made up 61.7% of hospitalisations from Nov 8-21 despite making up just 9% of the population. Seems pretty good odds to me, even if I do need to get a jab every 6 months.chowda wrote: ↑Wed Nov 24, 2021 3:56 pm annnd so what?
They got a cough? The sniffles? runny nose?
A couple of things, a) that the "press" continually is chasing a casedemic, and b) people like you think your showing your superior intellect by linking this kind of crap.
Im loving the fact that your precious "vaccine" is waning only after a few months and you drones continue preach and will line up for never ending boosters to keep your "passes" valid.
Curious, the flu shot is once a year, but the "vaccine" is now looking like every six months(Israel for starters) for a re-jab, so why continue to call it a vaccine?
Gotta have that beer in a pub or trip to disneyland, huh?
Covidiot indeed.
CpnCrunch wrote: ↑Wed Nov 24, 2021 4:39 pmWell here in BC unvaccinated people made up 61.7% of hospitalisations from Nov 8-21 despite making up just 9% of the population. Seems pretty good odds to me, even if I do need to get a jab every 6 months.chowda wrote: ↑Wed Nov 24, 2021 3:56 pm annnd so what?
They got a cough? The sniffles? runny nose?
A couple of things, a) that the "press" continually is chasing a casedemic, and b) people like you think your showing your superior intellect by linking this kind of crap.
Im loving the fact that your precious "vaccine" is waning only after a few months and you drones continue preach and will line up for never ending boosters to keep your "passes" valid.
Curious, the flu shot is once a year, but the "vaccine" is now looking like every six months(Israel for starters) for a re-jab, so why continue to call it a vaccine?
Gotta have that beer in a pub or trip to disneyland, huh?
Covidiot indeed.
https://news.gov.bc.ca/releases/2021HLTH0073-002247
Well I know you're opposed to mandates. So I'll assume you're cool with a death rate of 40 people per day, which is 280 per week. A rate of 7.3 deaths per million people.CYERCaptainPooping wrote: ↑Wed Nov 24, 2021 8:56 pm How many flu/pneumonia deaths are acceptable? Canada will have 25-40 non covid respiratory viral deaths a day during flu season. Have we been doing this wrong for a long time? We could have locked down for the flu massacre of 2015 and 2018, but no one seems to care about flu deaths and hallways medicine of the past. Maybe we should be consistent.
I don’t have a specific number, but apparently the vaccine are very effective according to the data presented here. So I would think, if the vaccine is effective and it’s free and available to anyone who wants it, we should drop all the restrictions.
Death counts are meaningless, the vaccinated are safe. Should we feel bad for those who choose not to get vaccinated and get sick? I say nah… time to go back to normal.
If you could go back to 2018, would you advocate for lockdowns and vaccine mandates to prevent those thousands of flu deaths? Were we just doing it wrong back then?Bingo Fuel wrote: ↑Wed Nov 24, 2021 9:34 pmWell I know you're opposed to mandates. So I'll assume you're cool with a death rate of 40 people per day, which is 280 per week. A rate of 7.3 deaths per million people.CYERCaptainPooping wrote: ↑Wed Nov 24, 2021 8:56 pm How many flu/pneumonia deaths are acceptable? Canada will have 25-40 non covid respiratory viral deaths a day during flu season. Have we been doing this wrong for a long time? We could have locked down for the flu massacre of 2015 and 2018, but no one seems to care about flu deaths and hallways medicine of the past. Maybe we should be consistent.
I don’t have a specific number, but apparently the vaccine are very effective according to the data presented here. So I would think, if the vaccine is effective and it’s free and available to anyone who wants it, we should drop all the restrictions.
Death counts are meaningless, the vaccinated are safe. Should we feel bad for those who choose not to get vaccinated and get sick? I say nah… time to go back to normal.
You are comparing apple with orange.
Interestingly:Six in seven COVID-19 infections go undetected in Africa
Also, because of all these particularities I listed above:After testing more than 3000 blood donors, Uyoga and colleagues estimated in a preprint last month that one in 20 Kenyans aged 15 to 64—or 1.6 million people—has antibodies to SARS-CoV-2, an indication of past infection. That would put Kenya on a par with Spain in mid-May when that country was descending from its coronavirus peak and had 27,000 official COVID-19 deaths.
If tens of millions of Africans have already been infected, that raises the question of whether the continent should try for "herd immunity" without a vaccine, Boum says—the controversial idea of letting the virus run its course to allow the population to become immune, perhaps while shielding the most vulnerable. That might be preferable over control measures that cripple economies and could harm public health more in the long run. "Maybe Africa can afford it"
Okay, so we increase health education and provide incentives to live a healthier life. Cool. Is that something that has been tried elsewhere? Or is your idea so novel and revolutionary that it hasn't been tried anywhere else around the world?
I think I've made it abundantly clear that the COVID death rates around the world are significantly higher than the flu death rate you provided.CYERCaptainPooping wrote: ↑Thu Nov 25, 2021 8:38 am No need to play the “so what you are saying is” game with me. I think I made myself clear, but you have yet to answer. If you could go back in time would you lockdown, mandate masks and vaccines for the flu as the flu has had worse mortality rates to what our current death rates are today with Covid. It seems like you are the one okay with deaths, but I’ll let you explain yourself so we can all understand how your little brain works.
Thank you for your insight Dr. Pooper. I will take your opinion with as much regard as I take the medical professionals who have spent decades studying infectious diseases.CYERCaptainPooping wrote: ↑Thu Nov 25, 2021 9:05 am So we were doing it wrong. I see, well that helps clarify where people stand.
I mean Covid today is no more deadly than the flu with vaccines. If we dropped all measures and had voluntary vaccines (in other words if Covid policy today was exactly the same as flu policy of pre covid) I think we would see very similar hospitalizations and mortality.
So not to put words in your mouth, but if you think we were doing the flu wrong in hindsight, then of course we could really say we need a new normal. This would mean there is absolutely a new normal. The new normal would be if the government says the flu will be extra bad this year, they could mandate flu shots. They could mandate masks for the flu etc.
And if that’s your stance, I disagree because I stick to what I know and not some sort of social science experiment. I don’t know what the consequences of locking down intermittently and all these policies would mean for the long term. I don’t think other countries will actually accept such a way of living. Death is a normal part of life. One of the most normal parts of life really. I think this is why we accepted flu deaths in the past, because disease has a way of being a normal part of living. And yes we take personal precautions like hand washing to prevent spread of disease, but we don’t expect people to take weeks off work to stop the flu. We don’t make policy at other peoples expense to curb a few deaths. So I don’t really believe I’m radical to say I don’t really care or think it’s wrong to not implement policies around Covid if it’s mortality is similar to the flu. We didn’t care then, so why should we care now? Or at least if you want to change some policy to save lives, prove to me the policy doesn’t negatively impact or have consequences for others.
Like if I said, we could save 2 percent of lives from flu or Covid deaths, but it means you can’t work. This is what we need to do to stop these deaths, you stay home indefinitely. Do you accept this? Doctors, teachers etc they all work and get paid (they are not disease spreaders) but you are. You are in aviation and useless, so you stay home to save some lives. Do you accept this? This is basically what happened this pandemic. How long will you accept your life purpose is to stay home and not spread disease? Are you okay if Trudeau shuts airlines down in a month if cases spike? They can just say we are the reason the spread is happening, stay home… hmmm.
I gave you lots to unpack, but do you see where I’m coming from? It’s not really radical to say this is how we did it, so this is how we will do it. If you want change, I could be on board. But real, long term change is not arbitrary government lockdowns, picking and choosing winners and losers etc. make the change meaningful… like you said make more robust healthcare… I’m on board with that. How sensible if hospitals need more beds, hire more staff. I’m on board!
You are absolutely correct, but your point is irrelevant.CYERCaptainPooping wrote: ↑Thu Nov 25, 2021 9:32 am Experts in infectious disease are not economists. They are a very narrow field in a very large web of issues surrounding Covid. Maybe ask yourself why a disease expert says Walmart should stay open but small but should close? Ask more questions as you deserve answers. You are welcome, glad you enjoyed my insight lol.
Sure I know what I’m talking about. I’m talking about what is right for me. We are our own experts. That’s why freedoms are amazing, you don’t have to live by science, and what experts dictate. You can be artistic, spiritual, scientific etc. I take in all information and make choices. Some decisions are based on science, sometimes I use morals or values etc.imjustlurking wrote: ↑Thu Nov 25, 2021 9:36 amYou are absolutely correct, but your point is irrelevant.CYERCaptainPooping wrote: ↑Thu Nov 25, 2021 9:32 am Experts in infectious disease are not economists. They are a very narrow field in a very large web of issues surrounding Covid. Maybe ask yourself why a disease expert says Walmart should stay open but small but should close? Ask more questions as you deserve answers. You are welcome, glad you enjoyed my insight lol.
The statement that apples are not bananas is as irrelevant to the fact that you don't know what you're talking about as PhDs specializing in infectious disease.
DOFO is an ass hat. Does anyone like that guy?Bingo Fuel wrote: ↑Thu Nov 25, 2021 10:07 am We could start with paid sick days for all. 5-10 paid days off so people don't have to choose between their health and paying the bills.
Would also cut down significantly on workplace transmission.
Seems obvious, right? So why won't our provincial governments do it?
F* me... Pooper can say something agreeable!