Lets Shop at Home
Moderators: sky's the limit, sepia, Sulako, lilfssister, North Shore, I WAS Birddog
-
- Rank 3
- Posts: 148
- Joined: Sun Mar 29, 2020 1:09 pm
Lets Shop at Home
https://www.ctvnews.ca/canada/ottawa-ey ... -1.6331606
An "Global" opportunity for a little ROI on behalf of the Canadian taxpayer's.
An "Global" opportunity for a little ROI on behalf of the Canadian taxpayer's.
Re: Lets Shop at Home
When Canada chooses any new aircraft they need to take a look and learn from the mess that the CC295 program is in.
Re: Lets Shop at Home
Oh FFS….you can’t just take a civilian airplane and paint it grey. That’s how we got the Griffon.TrilliumFlt wrote: ↑Tue Mar 28, 2023 10:09 am https://www.ctvnews.ca/canada/ottawa-ey ... -1.6331606
An "Global" opportunity for a little ROI on behalf of the Canadian taxpayer's.
…also…you can’t take stock military aircraft and ‘Canadianize’ it….that is how we got the mess with the 295 and the SeaKing. Best procurements ever…C17, C130J and the Chinook. Buy them off the shelf and start operating them.
-
- Rank 3
- Posts: 148
- Joined: Sun Mar 29, 2020 1:09 pm
Re: Lets Shop at Home
Oh FFS its already been done, it's called the Astor.tsgarp wrote: ↑Tue Mar 28, 2023 2:52 pmOh FFS….you can’t just take a civilian airplane and paint it grey. That’s how we got the Griffon.TrilliumFlt wrote: ↑Tue Mar 28, 2023 10:09 am https://www.ctvnews.ca/canada/ottawa-ey ... -1.6331606
An "Global" opportunity for a little ROI on behalf of the Canadian taxpayer's.
…also…you can’t take stock military aircraft and ‘Canadianize’ it….that is how we got the mess with the 295 and the SeaKing. Best procurements ever…C17, C130J and the Chinook. Buy them off the shelf and start operating them.
https://www.airforce-technology.com/projects/astor/
-
- Rank 5
- Posts: 373
- Joined: Sun Sep 22, 2013 8:42 am
- Location: CYUL
Re: Lets Shop at Home
Fvck Boeing!
If the Global Express variant does the job (several countries have them including the USA), why not buy a Canadian product?
The Global can takeoff and land in shorter fields, fly further, faster and higher than that the B737 variant and burn less jet fuel in the process which should be a good thing for our idiot prime minister and his green agenda.
If the Global Express variant does the job (several countries have them including the USA), why not buy a Canadian product?
The Global can takeoff and land in shorter fields, fly further, faster and higher than that the B737 variant and burn less jet fuel in the process which should be a good thing for our idiot prime minister and his green agenda.
Re: Lets Shop at Home
https://www.naval-technology.com/projec ... ary%202016.
Saab has kits for both the q400 and global for MPA in use right now
Saab has kits for both the q400 and global for MPA in use right now
-
- Rank 3
- Posts: 148
- Joined: Sun Mar 29, 2020 1:09 pm
Re: Lets Shop at Home
There is also this variant as well. It's not the first rodeo for the Global airframe.
https://www.airforce-technology.com/pro ... craft-usa/
https://www.airforce-technology.com/pro ... craft-usa/
Re: Lets Shop at Home
You do realize the difference between Maritime Patrol and ISR, right?TrilliumFlt wrote: ↑Tue Mar 28, 2023 4:06 pmOh FFS its already been done, it's called the Astor.tsgarp wrote: ↑Tue Mar 28, 2023 2:52 pmOh FFS….you can’t just take a civilian airplane and paint it grey. That’s how we got the Griffon.TrilliumFlt wrote: ↑Tue Mar 28, 2023 10:09 am https://www.ctvnews.ca/canada/ottawa-ey ... -1.6331606
An "Global" opportunity for a little ROI on behalf of the Canadian taxpayer's.
…also…you can’t take stock military aircraft and ‘Canadianize’ it….that is how we got the mess with the 295 and the SeaKing. Best procurements ever…C17, C130J and the Chinook. Buy them off the shelf and start operating them.
https://www.airforce-technology.com/projects/astor/
Re: Lets Shop at Home
Again, not Maritime Patrol.TrilliumFlt wrote: ↑Tue Mar 28, 2023 4:37 pm There is also this variant as well. It's not the first rodeo for the Global airframe.
https://www.airforce-technology.com/pro ... craft-usa/
Re: Lets Shop at Home
Why convert something to a task when there are already purpose built platforms available.rigpiggy wrote: ↑Tue Mar 28, 2023 4:26 pm https://www.naval-technology.com/projec ... ary%202016.
Saab has kits for both the q400 and global for MPA in use right now
-
- Rank 5
- Posts: 367
- Joined: Sun Mar 29, 2020 12:51 pm
Re: Lets Shop at Home
I think your missing the point, a suitable domestic product can be had with a small amount of "home grown" effort.tsgarp wrote: ↑Thu Mar 30, 2023 1:57 pmYou do realize the difference between Maritime Patrol and ISR, right?TrilliumFlt wrote: ↑Tue Mar 28, 2023 4:06 pmOh FFS its already been done, it's called the Astor.tsgarp wrote: ↑Tue Mar 28, 2023 2:52 pm
Oh FFS….you can’t just take a civilian airplane and paint it grey. That’s how we got the Griffon.
…also…you can’t take stock military aircraft and ‘Canadianize’ it….that is how we got the mess with the 295 and the SeaKing. Best procurements ever…C17, C130J and the Chinook. Buy them off the shelf and start operating them.
https://www.airforce-technology.com/projects/astor/
Re: Lets Shop at Home
Q400 seems like it would be a good platform for this
-
- Rank 3
- Posts: 148
- Joined: Sun Mar 29, 2020 1:09 pm
Re: Lets Shop at Home
ABSOLUTELY, it's very suitable.
For the military I suspect manufacturer dispensation could/would be granted; if that's even necessary, for operations above FL250 if required for mission suitability. It's my understanding that a airplane operated by the military is not necessarily bound by the civilian type certificate.
-
- Rank (9)
- Posts: 1290
- Joined: Mon Jan 02, 2006 3:28 pm
Re: Lets Shop at Home
I think you have missed the point. It's not about which airframe, it's about all the other stuff required for the mission. For the maritime mission, the stuff mounted inside the airplane is what is of importance, not the airframe to which it's mounted.I think your missing the point, a suitable domestic product can be had with a small amount of "home grown" effort.Loon-A-Tic wrote: ↑Fri Mar 31, 2023 8:02 am You do realize the difference between Maritime Patrol and ISR, right?
Re: Lets Shop at Home
No, I’ve seen, at close range, the amount of effort required, and the results of trying to do this. The effort is titanic and the results are lacklustre. It costs significantly more, takes significantly longer and works poorly. Buy something off the shelf, put it directly into service and put the money into health care. @#$! Bombardier.Loon-A-Tic wrote: ↑Fri Mar 31, 2023 8:02 amI think your missing the point, a suitable domestic product can be had with a small amount of "home grown" effort.tsgarp wrote: ↑Thu Mar 30, 2023 1:57 pmYou do realize the difference between Maritime Patrol and ISR, right?TrilliumFlt wrote: ↑Tue Mar 28, 2023 4:06 pm
Oh FFS its already been done, it's called the Astor.
https://www.airforce-technology.com/projects/astor/
Re: Lets Shop at Home
Sure, it’s just a simple matter of retrofitting a bomb bay into a pressurized aircraft, upgrading the electrical system to support the advanced RADAR and other mission avionics like optical sensors, installing a self defence suit, MAD, increasing the endurance so that it can loiter for 14 hours or so and reinforcing the wings for prolonged maneuvering flight at low altitudes (something they had to account for on the Gonzo). The very definition of quick, cheap and easy.TrilliumFlt wrote: ↑Fri Mar 31, 2023 8:50 amABSOLUTELY, it's very suitable.
For the military I suspect manufacturer dispensation could/would be granted; if that's even necessary, for operations above FL250 if required for mission suitability. It's my understanding that a airplane operated by the military is not necessarily bound by the civilian type certificate.
…oh yeah, don’t forget sonobouys……lots and lots of sonobouys and a way to launch them
Re: Lets Shop at Home
I believe used that disastrous thought process for the final variant of the Nimrod.Loon-A-Tic wrote: ↑Fri Mar 31, 2023 8:02 amI think your missing the point, a suitable domestic product can be had with a small amount of "home grown" effort.tsgarp wrote: ↑Thu Mar 30, 2023 1:57 pmYou do realize the difference between Maritime Patrol and ISR, right?TrilliumFlt wrote: ↑Tue Mar 28, 2023 4:06 pm
Oh FFS its already been done, it's called the Astor.
https://www.airforce-technology.com/projects/astor/