Then Jazz wouldn't have any sub 1500 hr pilots.
So where would the pilots come from?
Its in better interest of Jazz not crash, they might have to pay $200k for an fo if Jazz can't rely on non-ATPL
Moderators: lilfssister, North Shore, sky's the limit, sepia, Sulako, I WAS Birddog
Then Jazz wouldn't have any sub 1500 hr pilots.
Even if it's not recent development, its not safe & should stop.
How do you suggest it stop? Do you think the airline will just volunteer to stop hiring these guys? AC has already shown it will allow its regional network to rote because they don't want to pay. Do you think they will up the pay for pilots unless forced. Only Transport can make that happen, but applying the same rule as they have in the states. But can guarantee they won't do that until there is a major incident where crew qualifications are implicated as the cause.CanadaAir wrote: ↑Thu Sep 14, 2023 4:44 pmEven if it's not recent development, its not safe & should stop.
Some pilots may be benefitting from the quick upgrades & time on jets & higher pay, understood, its still not safe & should stop. Pilot may not like the idea of the stop.
What's more important, temporary high pay, or all the Jazz pilots out of work from a company shut down?
Like your thoughtstruedude wrote: ↑Thu Sep 14, 2023 6:29 pm
How do you suggest it stop? Do you think the airline will just volunteer to stop hiring these guys? AC has already shown it will allow its regional network to rote because they don't want to pay. Do you think they will up the pay for pilots unless forced. Only Transport can make that happen, but applying the same rule as they have in the states. But can guarantee they won't do that until there is a major incident where crew qualifications are implicated as the cause.
Spoken like someone who truely has no clue what he is talking about.CanadaAir wrote: ↑Fri Sep 15, 2023 6:09 amLike your thoughtstruedude wrote: ↑Thu Sep 14, 2023 6:29 pm
How do you suggest it stop? Do you think the airline will just volunteer to stop hiring these guys? AC has already shown it will allow its regional network to rote because they don't want to pay. Do you think they will up the pay for pilots unless forced. Only Transport can make that happen, but applying the same rule as they have in the states. But can guarantee they won't do that until there is a major incident where crew qualifications are implicated as the cause.
The suggestion would be the Jazz MEC & Jazz pilots really consider the risk thats going on & building worse over time. Now contract trainers might not even have experience with Jazz or the concept of junior fo & junior captains. The risks continuing to get worse.
The Jazz MEC & Jazz pilots should consider whether the risk's worth it to continue as is or start putting pressure on the company & TC to stop this.
If a crash does happen, on top of all the death, it will likely be the end of Jazz.
No one will want to fly with Jazz. AC will take a major hit that will take years to recover from.
Think of the headlines
“Air Canada crash kills 80
“Breaking News. Pilots of Air Canada crash both had less than 500 hours experience
Jazz would collapse. The pilots would be out of work or in limbo, lose their years of seniority & pensions. The flow would stop. The hiring at AC would shrink as passengers booked with WJ, Flair, Porter instead of AC.
Why would current Jazz pilots, especially senior ones want to take this risk? A risk of ending their careers at the company. For what benefit? Most agree that Jazz wages and conditions have fallen behind.
The MEC might want to talk to management immediately to stop this. If management doesn't listen then the MEC should get involved with TC. If TC doesn't react, then it will be TC's fault when the accident happens.
TC should see how insane this is getting.
Junior captains, junior fo, new contract trainers. Throw in some bad weather or maintenance issues, a bad schedule & fatigue. Pressure to fly more, extra hours a month at end of year to keep up with schedule.
The holes are aligning.
From someone on the outside, I would find in incomprehensible that any Canadian airline would let an individual occupy any seat( especially left) if there were doubts about said persons ability. Pardon my airline ignorance but isn’t there many checks utilized throughout training that would trigger concerns on skill sets. Wouldn’t an airline park/ cancel schedules due shortage rather than chance a serious incident. Having said that, there are well documented accidents in the US where , for sake of a better term , unqualified pilots was a major contributing factor. The Couglin Q400 crash is an example.Outlaw58 wrote: ↑Fri Sep 15, 2023 6:45 amSpoken like someone who truely has no clue what he is talking about.CanadaAir wrote: ↑Fri Sep 15, 2023 6:09 amLike your thoughtstruedude wrote: ↑Thu Sep 14, 2023 6:29 pm
How do you suggest it stop? Do you think the airline will just volunteer to stop hiring these guys? AC has already shown it will allow its regional network to rote because they don't want to pay. Do you think they will up the pay for pilots unless forced. Only Transport can make that happen, but applying the same rule as they have in the states. But can guarantee they won't do that until there is a major incident where crew qualifications are implicated as the cause.
The suggestion would be the Jazz MEC & Jazz pilots really consider the risk thats going on & building worse over time. Now contract trainers might not even have experience with Jazz or the concept of junior fo & junior captains. The risks continuing to get worse.
The Jazz MEC & Jazz pilots should consider whether the risk's worth it to continue as is or start putting pressure on the company & TC to stop this.
If a crash does happen, on top of all the death, it will likely be the end of Jazz.
No one will want to fly with Jazz. AC will take a major hit that will take years to recover from.
Think of the headlines
“Air Canada crash kills 80
“Breaking News. Pilots of Air Canada crash both had less than 500 hours experience
Jazz would collapse. The pilots would be out of work or in limbo, lose their years of seniority & pensions. The flow would stop. The hiring at AC would shrink as passengers booked with WJ, Flair, Porter instead of AC.
Why would current Jazz pilots, especially senior ones want to take this risk? A risk of ending their careers at the company. For what benefit? Most agree that Jazz wages and conditions have fallen behind.
The MEC might want to talk to management immediately to stop this. If management doesn't listen then the MEC should get involved with TC. If TC doesn't react, then it will be TC's fault when the accident happens.
TC should see how insane this is getting.
Junior captains, junior fo, new contract trainers. Throw in some bad weather or maintenance issues, a bad schedule & fatigue. Pressure to fly more, extra hours a month at end of year to keep up with schedule.
The holes are aligning.
Are ATPL holders with no previous 705 experience being awarded CA position on a jet at Jazz? Absolutely.
Are there any CA at Jazz that do not belong in the seat they occupy? Absolutely not!
Just because the contract allows any ATPL holder with enough seniority to bid and be awarded a CA position, does not mean that that pilot automatically slides in the left seat. One has to make it though the upgrade training and that is not a guarantee. Things may not be great at Jazz, but there is one thing that has NOT changed: The Standard is The Standard. ALL active and released pilots at Jazz meet the standard required for the position they hold.
58
The Colgin Q400 accident had multiple contributing factors.
The FO had 2200 hrs. The 1500 hr rule ( while I am in favour) wouldn’t change that. It is mentioned in the report about her fatigue due to commuting and that she was sick (although it doesn’t say that contributed.Fanblade wrote: ↑Fri Sep 15, 2023 11:00 amThe Colgin Q400 accident had multiple contributing factors.
- FO's inexperience. Addressed by requiring 1500 hours
- Captain training. Not sure how that was addressed
- Lack of pay to be able to live in or even commute properly to an expensive domicile. Leading to fatigue.
Two of the three factors exist in Canadian aviation today. Not just at Jazz either.
YVR hotels reached prices no new hire could afford this summer. Nor can that new hire afford to live in YVR.
Colgan Air is always a low hanging fruit argument for those who aren't completely informed.Old fella wrote: ↑Fri Sep 15, 2023 7:12 amFrom someone on the outside, I would find in incomprehensible that any Canadian airline would let an individual occupy any seat( especially left) if there were doubts about said persons ability. Pardon my airline ignorance but isn’t there many checks utilized throughout training that would trigger concerns on skill sets. Wouldn’t an airline park/ cancel schedules due shortage rather than chance a serious incident. Having said that, there are well documented accidents in the US where , for sake of a better term , unqualified pilots was a major contributing factor. The Couglin Q400 crash is an example.Outlaw58 wrote: ↑Fri Sep 15, 2023 6:45 amSpoken like someone who truely has no clue what he is talking about.CanadaAir wrote: ↑Fri Sep 15, 2023 6:09 am
Like your thoughts
The suggestion would be the Jazz MEC & Jazz pilots really consider the risk thats going on & building worse over time. Now contract trainers might not even have experience with Jazz or the concept of junior fo & junior captains. The risks continuing to get worse.
The Jazz MEC & Jazz pilots should consider whether the risk's worth it to continue as is or start putting pressure on the company & TC to stop this.
If a crash does happen, on top of all the death, it will likely be the end of Jazz.
No one will want to fly with Jazz. AC will take a major hit that will take years to recover from.
Think of the headlines
“Air Canada crash kills 80
“Breaking News. Pilots of Air Canada crash both had less than 500 hours experience
Jazz would collapse. The pilots would be out of work or in limbo, lose their years of seniority & pensions. The flow would stop. The hiring at AC would shrink as passengers booked with WJ, Flair, Porter instead of AC.
Why would current Jazz pilots, especially senior ones want to take this risk? A risk of ending their careers at the company. For what benefit? Most agree that Jazz wages and conditions have fallen behind.
The MEC might want to talk to management immediately to stop this. If management doesn't listen then the MEC should get involved with TC. If TC doesn't react, then it will be TC's fault when the accident happens.
TC should see how insane this is getting.
Junior captains, junior fo, new contract trainers. Throw in some bad weather or maintenance issues, a bad schedule & fatigue. Pressure to fly more, extra hours a month at end of year to keep up with schedule.
The holes are aligning.
Are ATPL holders with no previous 705 experience being awarded CA position on a jet at Jazz? Absolutely.
Are there any CA at Jazz that do not belong in the seat they occupy? Absolutely not!
Just because the contract allows any ATPL holder with enough seniority to bid and be awarded a CA position, does not mean that that pilot automatically slides in the left seat. One has to make it though the upgrade training and that is not a guarantee. Things may not be great at Jazz, but there is one thing that has NOT changed: The Standard is The Standard. ALL active and released pilots at Jazz meet the standard required for the position they hold.
58
Not sure why you are singling out Jazz. What you are talking about is happening a most companies these days. I know tons of pilots who went to Air Canada with 2000 hours TT and multi engine PIC hours I could count on my fingers and toes and guess what? They were captains at AC a year or 2 later. The countryside obviously isn’t littered with crashed airplanes in case you haven’t noticed.CanadaAir wrote: ↑Thu Sep 14, 2023 4:44 pmEven if it's not recent development, its not safe & should stop.
Some pilots may be benefitting from the quick upgrades & time on jets & higher pay, understood, its still not safe & should stop. Pilot may not like the idea of the stop.
What's more important, temporary high pay, or all the Jazz pilots out of work from a company shut down?
What makes you say it's not safe?
In airline instruction meeting a government standard is one step of many to competence.Outlaw58 wrote: ↑Fri Sep 15, 2023 6:45 am
Spoken like someone who truely has no clue what he is talking about.
Are ATPL holders with no previous 705 experience being awarded CA position on a jet at Jazz? Absolutely.
Are there any CA at Jazz that do not belong in the seat they occupy? Absolutely not!
Just because the contract allows any ATPL holder with enough seniority to bid and be awarded a CA position, does not mean that that pilot automatically slides in the left seat. One has to make it though the upgrade training and that is not a guarantee. Things may not be great at Jazz, but there is one thing that has NOT changed: The Standard is The Standard. ALL active and released pilots at Jazz meet the standard required for the position they hold.
58
Competent crew linked to years of learning on the typeBTD wrote: ↑Fri Sep 15, 2023 11:55 am The FO had 2200 hrs. The 1500 hr rule ( while I am in favour) wouldn’t change that. It is mentioned in the report about her fatigue due to commuting and that she was sick (although it doesn’t say that contributed.
The capt was just a mess though, signified through his training history.
Colgan's one example, used often as it showed many problems with industry, most still exist
We don't run the company. We don't get to pick what they do. And it isn't just Jazz, it is Encore, PAL and any other operator at this level. There isn't a pilot at Jazz that wouldn't love to see a 1500 hr minimum rule, as our pay would sky rocket. But it isn't up to us.CanadaAir wrote: ↑Fri Sep 15, 2023 12:55 pmIn airline instruction meeting a government standard is one step of many to competence.Outlaw58 wrote: ↑Fri Sep 15, 2023 6:45 am
Spoken like someone who truely has no clue what he is talking about.
Are ATPL holders with no previous 705 experience being awarded CA position on a jet at Jazz? Absolutely.
Are there any CA at Jazz that do not belong in the seat they occupy? Absolutely not!
Just because the contract allows any ATPL holder with enough seniority to bid and be awarded a CA position, does not mean that that pilot automatically slides in the left seat. One has to make it though the upgrade training and that is not a guarantee. Things may not be great at Jazz, but there is one thing that has NOT changed: The Standard is The Standard. ALL active and released pilots at Jazz meet the standard required for the position they hold.
58
Passing training & ride’s a minimum in the industry
Competent crew linked to years of learning on the type
Colgan captain had 111 hr on Q400, minimal time on type
Do Jazz pilots want a company where captain & fo meeting the minimum standard can be flying together?
Who might be fine if the standard flight occurs, but lack ability to deal with irregularities. Or added pressure.
Is allowing the company to do this worth the risk to your job, seniority & pension if a crash were to occur?
Too simplistic to be valid... There was much more nuance to Colgan...CanadaAir wrote: ↑Fri Sep 15, 2023 1:00 pmColgan's one example, used often as it showed many problems with industry, most still exist
Competent crew linked to years of learning on the type
Colgan captain had 111 hr on Q400, minimal time on type
Fo was under 800 hr on type
Two crew min type experience, deadly result
At AC, at least 2 years to learn company & routes.Inverted2 wrote: ↑Fri Sep 15, 2023 12:09 pm
Not sure why you are singling out Jazz. What you are talking about is happening a most companies these days. I know tons of pilots who went to Air Canada with 2000 hours TT and multi engine PIC hours I could count on my fingers and toes and guess what? They were captains at AC a year or 2 later. The countryside obviously isn’t littered with crashed airplanes in case you haven’t noticed.
Yes there's more nuance.QKZXKV wrote: ↑Fri Sep 15, 2023 1:06 pmToo simplistic to be valid... There was much more nuance to Colgan...CanadaAir wrote: ↑Fri Sep 15, 2023 1:00 pmColgan's one example, used often as it showed many problems with industry, most still exist
Competent crew linked to years of learning on the type
Colgan captain had 111 hr on Q400, minimal time on type
Fo was under 800 hr on type
Two crew min type experience, deadly result
Pilots have some say. They can discuss safety with CEO & management.truedude wrote: ↑Fri Sep 15, 2023 1:04 pm
We don't run the company. We don't get to pick what they do. And it isn't just Jazz, it is Encore, PAL and any other operator at this level. There isn't a pilot at Jazz that wouldn't love to see a 1500 hr minimum rule, as our pay would sky rocket. But it isn't up to us.
It needs to come from Transport. And they don't care, and won't care until there is an accident.
A captain should have at least a few years on similar type & routes prior to captaining the aircraft.
Well, the 'routes' argument is kind of void. There's a whole industry (corporate, air taxi) where pilots/captains operate on brand new 'routes' every day. So let's ignore that aspect for a moment then.CanadaAir wrote: ↑Fri Sep 15, 2023 1:25 pmA captain should have at least a few years on similar type & routes prior to captaining the aircraft.
If Jazz or other company isn't doing that, then it's not safe.
Its less safe if the captain doesn't have the years on type & also the fo doesn't have years on type or even an ATPL.
What would make it safe, at least 1000 hrs of time on similar type to be a captain. 1500 hrs on similar type to work with junior non ATPL fo.
This means the companies such as Jazz need to retain their experienced captains & fo.
Going from a piston multi or king air to q400 or jet isn't similar type.
Even with 6000 hr king air, the pilot should still sit for a few years as fo before captaining a jet.
Maybe the 6000 hr king fo should be paid over what a 250 hr fo makes, thats another topic
What argument are you talking about? They still need to pass the training