Multiple High Speed RTO's Are a Bad Idea
Moderators: sky's the limit, sepia, Sulako, lilfssister, North Shore
Multiple High Speed RTO's Are a Bad Idea
There is only so much braking energy available. And the hotter the brakes, the less effective they are. It is surprising how much heat they generate. As soon as I saw this incident, I was reminded of the guys that burned out a 737 doing multiple high-speed RTO(yes, there were pax on board but strange things happen in Africa).......
https://aviation-safety.net/database/re ... -0&lang=de
Don't do multiple RTO's or high speed taxiing and braking.
From TSB....
C-GNOV, a Piper PA-31 aircraft registered to C.F. Aviation Inc., was performing high speed taxi
runs on Runway 15/33 at Igloolik Airport (CYGT), NU with 2 pilots on board. There was no intent of
flight, and the purpose of the ground runs was to evaluate engine performance after fueling the
aircraft with barreled AVGAS and not damage the propellers on the gravel apron. After a few high-
speed taxi runs, the aircraft's brakes failed to respond, and the aircraft exited the end of Runway
33. The aircraft came to rest in a ditch, upright with damage to both propellers, forward fuselage,
and nose landing gear. Airport fire/rescue extinguished a small brake fire on the left main landing
gear. The ELT activated. The 2 pilots were not injured.
https://aviation-safety.net/database/re ... -0&lang=de
Don't do multiple RTO's or high speed taxiing and braking.
From TSB....
C-GNOV, a Piper PA-31 aircraft registered to C.F. Aviation Inc., was performing high speed taxi
runs on Runway 15/33 at Igloolik Airport (CYGT), NU with 2 pilots on board. There was no intent of
flight, and the purpose of the ground runs was to evaluate engine performance after fueling the
aircraft with barreled AVGAS and not damage the propellers on the gravel apron. After a few high-
speed taxi runs, the aircraft's brakes failed to respond, and the aircraft exited the end of Runway
33. The aircraft came to rest in a ditch, upright with damage to both propellers, forward fuselage,
and nose landing gear. Airport fire/rescue extinguished a small brake fire on the left main landing
gear. The ELT activated. The 2 pilots were not injured.
Re: Multiple High Speed RTO's Are a Bad Idea
"Well boss, the good news is we didn't crash due to contaminated AvGas!"
As an AvCanada discussion grows longer:
-the probability of 'entitlement' being mentioned, approaches 1
-one will be accused of using bad airmanship
-the probability of 'entitlement' being mentioned, approaches 1
-one will be accused of using bad airmanship
Re: Multiple High Speed RTO's Are a Bad Idea
That bad news, the props would have been better off doing a run up over gravel.
Most northern airports have a least a small cement or paved pad for run ups, nothing there?
Re: Multiple High Speed RTO's Are a Bad Idea
If they could get approval to tie-up the runway and do high-speed taxi runs , why not just get approval to do engine run-ups sitting at the threshold? 

Being stupid around airplanes is a capital offence and nature is a hanging judge!
“It ain't what you don't know that gets you into trouble. It's what you know for sure that just ain't so.”
Mark Twain
“It ain't what you don't know that gets you into trouble. It's what you know for sure that just ain't so.”
Mark Twain
Re: Multiple High Speed RTO's Are a Bad Idea
Did you miss the fact that it's all gravel?
-
- Rank (9)
- Posts: 1289
- Joined: Mon Jan 02, 2006 3:28 pm
Re: Multiple High Speed RTO's Are a Bad Idea
Now I'm really curious. Who do you ask for 'approval' to tie up the runway at Igloolik ?
Re: Multiple High Speed RTO's Are a Bad Idea
Many arctic airports had a heavy rubber pad available for run/startup. That lasted until a twin otter sucked one into the props
Re: Multiple High Speed RTO's Are a Bad Idea
Whatever happened to sweeping the gravel from around the props?
Re: Multiple High Speed RTO's Are a Bad Idea
That works at idle and break away power but not feasible for a run up, I used to sweep the props and not move until I knew I could do the taxi and take off without stopping.
Re: Multiple High Speed RTO's Are a Bad Idea
My trick was to pour some leftover coffee under the props after sweeping, to keep the dust down. We always seemed to have some unwanted coffee or other liquids, and I’m sure it saved some wear on props, engines, and paint.
-
- Rank 3
- Posts: 179
- Joined: Mon Oct 22, 2012 9:14 pm
Re: Multiple High Speed RTO's Are a Bad Idea
Look for water/dirt/barrel liner flakes before putting the pump in. Use a filter.
Why would one need to evaluate engine performance after fueling from drums of AVGAS?
If it was suspect would it not be better to figure out if it is good or not prior to putting it in the plane?
Why would one need to evaluate engine performance after fueling from drums of AVGAS?
If it was suspect would it not be better to figure out if it is good or not prior to putting it in the plane?
Re: Multiple High Speed RTO's Are a Bad Idea
You can do a few tests before pumping it in a plane, but unless you travel with a chem lab, at some point you have to put it in a plane and see if it works.TailwheelPilot wrote: ↑Thu Oct 05, 2023 11:44 pm Look for water/dirt/barrel liner flakes before putting the pump in. Use a filter.
Why would one need to evaluate engine performance after fueling from drums of AVGAS?
If it was suspect would it not be better to figure out if it is good or not prior to putting it in the plane?
As an AvCanada discussion grows longer:
-the probability of 'entitlement' being mentioned, approaches 1
-one will be accused of using bad airmanship
-the probability of 'entitlement' being mentioned, approaches 1
-one will be accused of using bad airmanship
Re: Multiple High Speed RTO's Are a Bad Idea
In the end, if you are in a situation where it has been decided that an engine run is needed that results in a significant braking requirement.....let the brakes cool adequately between the large brake applications. Of course, more time will be consumed using this method.
-
- Rank 7
- Posts: 598
- Joined: Wed Nov 25, 2020 8:28 pm
Re: Multiple High Speed RTO's Are a Bad Idea
Always amazed people don't use google maps??
https://www.google.com/maps/place/Igloo ... 22024,289m
- rookiepilot
- Top Poster
- Posts: 5039
- Joined: Sat Apr 01, 2017 3:50 pm
Re: Multiple High Speed RTO's Are a Bad Idea
Yes, lets ask a non pilot for expert advice on operating on gravel…..newlygrounded wrote: ↑Fri Oct 06, 2023 10:54 amAlways amazed people don't use google maps??
https://www.google.com/maps/place/Igloo ... 22024,289m
-
- Rank 7
- Posts: 598
- Joined: Wed Nov 25, 2020 8:28 pm
Re: Multiple High Speed RTO's Are a Bad Idea
Can I see your economics degree Rookie? I don't want to take financial advice from an amaturerookiepilot wrote: ↑Fri Oct 06, 2023 11:17 amYes, lets ask a non pilot for expert advice on operating on gravel…..newlygrounded wrote: ↑Fri Oct 06, 2023 10:54 amAlways amazed people don't use google maps??
https://www.google.com/maps/place/Igloo ... 22024,289m

Do you see any hard paved area in this photo? Or do I need to be an ATPL to use my eyes?

- rookiepilot
- Top Poster
- Posts: 5039
- Joined: Sat Apr 01, 2017 3:50 pm
Re: Multiple High Speed RTO's Are a Bad Idea
Tell us more.newlygrounded wrote: ↑Fri Oct 06, 2023 11:20 amCan I see your economics degree Rookie? I don't want to take financial advice from an amaturerookiepilot wrote: ↑Fri Oct 06, 2023 11:17 amYes, lets ask a non pilot for expert advice on operating on gravel…..newlygrounded wrote: ↑Fri Oct 06, 2023 10:54 am
Always amazed people don't use google maps??
https://www.google.com/maps/place/Igloo ... 22024,289m![]()
Do you see any hard paved area in this photo? Or do I need to be an ATPL to use my eyes?
![]()
Your technique for starting up and operating out of such an airport.
And no googling allowed.
Re: Multiple High Speed RTO's Are a Bad Idea
Take the irrelevant stuff elsewhere. And learn how to spell amateur.rookiepilot wrote: ↑Fri Oct 06, 2023 12:20 pmTell us more.newlygrounded wrote: ↑Fri Oct 06, 2023 11:20 amCan I see your economics degree Rookie? I don't want to take financial advice from an amaturerookiepilot wrote: ↑Fri Oct 06, 2023 11:17 am
Yes, lets ask a non pilot for expert advice on operating on gravel…..![]()
Do you see any hard paved area in this photo? Or do I need to be an ATPL to use my eyes?
![]()
Your technique for starting up and operating out of such an airport.
And no googling allowed.
I don’t believe Igloolik has the concrete pad. Perhaps one could use its upslope to their advantage. In the late winter slippery season, it made operations more comfortable.
Re: Multiple High Speed RTO's Are a Bad Idea
Are you directing that to me, I have more gravel time than I care to remember, easily a couple thousand gravel take offs and of course landings. As for Igloolik, last time I was up there was over 20 years ago and don’t usually think of using google maps to see but I see the high speed taxi runs were necessary, given there’s no pavement anywhererookiepilot wrote: ↑Fri Oct 06, 2023 11:17 amYes, lets ask a non pilot for expert advice on operating on gravel…..newlygrounded wrote: ↑Fri Oct 06, 2023 10:54 amAlways amazed people don't use google maps??
https://www.google.com/maps/place/Igloo ... 22024,289m
- rookiepilot
- Top Poster
- Posts: 5039
- Joined: Sat Apr 01, 2017 3:50 pm
Re: Multiple High Speed RTO's Are a Bad Idea
No. To forever grounded, who I don’t believe is a licensed pilot.cdnavater wrote: ↑Fri Oct 06, 2023 2:39 pmAre you directing that to me, I have more gravel time than I care to remember, easily a couple thousand gravel take offs and of course landings. As for Igloolik, last time I was up there was over 20 years ago and don’t usually think of using google maps to see but I see the high speed taxi runs were necessary, given there’s no pavement anywhererookiepilot wrote: ↑Fri Oct 06, 2023 11:17 amYes, lets ask a non pilot for expert advice on operating on gravel…..newlygrounded wrote: ↑Fri Oct 06, 2023 10:54 am
Always amazed people don't use google maps??
https://www.google.com/maps/place/Igloo ... 22024,289m
Sucks what happened to this pilot of this thread….
-
- Rank 3
- Posts: 179
- Joined: Mon Oct 22, 2012 9:14 pm
Re: Multiple High Speed RTO's Are a Bad Idea
Kind of the point. You do some basic checks (water/dirt/debris/colour/clarity/smell) and accept it is correct and usable or not. I have never come across someone who puts fuel in a plane to determine if it works. Nor anyone who did engine runs after fuelling from a drum to see if the fuel was good. In my experience, any drums of questionable fuel get put aside and used for less critical uses, it is simply not worth it to put it in a plane.
Hence why I am asking why one would need to do "ground runs...to evaluate engine performance after fueling the
aircraft with barreled AVGAS"
Re: Multiple High Speed RTO's Are a Bad Idea
An abundance of caution maybe, me personally I would just run the engine at idle for a bit and be extra cautious during the take off run but I would think, of course depending how much fuel they added it would be apparent pretty quick.TailwheelPilot wrote: ↑Sat Oct 07, 2023 6:45 pmKind of the point. You do some basic checks (water/dirt/debris/colour/clarity/smell) and accept it is correct and usable or not. I have never come across someone who puts fuel in a plane to determine if it works. Nor anyone who did engine runs after fuelling from a drum to see if the fuel was good. In my experience, any drums of questionable fuel get put aside and used for less critical uses, it is simply not worth it to put it in a plane.
Hence why I am asking why one would need to do "ground runs...to evaluate engine performance after fueling the
aircraft with barreled AVGAS"
Now, something else to consider, the multiple runs could be because they were detecting issues.
Re: Multiple High Speed RTO's Are a Bad Idea
Good points. I am not sure how long you'd need to idle a Navajo to get the fresh fuel from the tanks to the engines to test. Then again, in such a plane it might be wiser to put the risky fuel in a seperate tank for cruise. But lots of variables.TailwheelPilot wrote: ↑Sat Oct 07, 2023 6:45 pmKind of the point. You do some basic checks (water/dirt/debris/colour/clarity/smell) and accept it is correct and usable or not. I have never come across someone who puts fuel in a plane to determine if it works. Nor anyone who did engine runs after fuelling from a drum to see if the fuel was good. In my experience, any drums of questionable fuel get put aside and used for less critical uses, it is simply not worth it to put it in a plane.
Hence why I am asking why one would need to do "ground runs...to evaluate engine performance after fueling the
aircraft with barreled AVGAS"
As an AvCanada discussion grows longer:
-the probability of 'entitlement' being mentioned, approaches 1
-one will be accused of using bad airmanship
-the probability of 'entitlement' being mentioned, approaches 1
-one will be accused of using bad airmanship
Re: Multiple High Speed RTO's Are a Bad Idea
The following accident report is good reading in regards to fuelling from drums, and whether or not a runup will detect problems:
https://www.tsb.gc.ca/eng/rapports-repo ... c0123.html
https://www.tsb.gc.ca/eng/rapports-repo ... c0123.html