Reasons Canadian Pilots think they’re less?

Discuss topics relating to airlines.

Moderators: North Shore, sky's the limit, sepia, Sulako

pitottubey
Rank 3
Rank 3
Posts: 176
Joined: Thu May 06, 2021 9:56 pm

Re: Reasons Canadian Pilots think they’re less?

Post by pitottubey »

cdnavater wrote: Fri Apr 26, 2024 1:46 pm
pitottubey wrote: Fri Apr 26, 2024 11:48 am
cdnavater wrote: Sat Jan 20, 2024 4:43 pm

I think the point has been lost, my point is that the regionals will not pay more than their mainline counterparts, that simple, it won’t happen ever, you can think as you like but I’ve been in this industry since 1990, I’ve developed my opinion based on those years witnessing and being affected by it personally.
Show me any regional airline in the world that pay more than their mainline counterparts and I’ll happily admit I’m wrong, I’m fairly certain I won’t have to though.
BTW, Jazz starting pay excluded because this was a temporary measure until they negotiate a new starting pay, to which I guarantee will be higher than ours, it was supposed to be higher and my guess, the AC management turned our original agreed upon wages down because it was too close to what they have in mind for their’s.
It will never ever happen ever, except right now currently at Jazz :lol:
I literally mentioned Jazz in my last paragraph, it’s temporary and would have been more but it weakened AC management’s negotiations so they kiboshed it! Learn about reading comprehension, something you may be lacking
Oh I read your comment just fine, I'm literally making fun of the idiocy of what you just said, and you can't seem to understand that. To spell it out for you I was simply highlighting the sheer stupidity of someone making an absolute statement followed up immediately by a contradiction. I thought the laughing emoji would have clued in even the thickest skulled boomers but I guess not! Oh well :rolleyes:
---------- ADS -----------
 
cdnavater
Rank 10
Rank 10
Posts: 2636
Joined: Wed Apr 21, 2021 11:25 am

Re: Reasons Canadian Pilots think they’re less?

Post by cdnavater »

pitottubey wrote: Sun Apr 28, 2024 7:49 pm
cdnavater wrote: Fri Apr 26, 2024 1:46 pm
pitottubey wrote: Fri Apr 26, 2024 11:48 am

It will never ever happen ever, except right now currently at Jazz :lol:
I literally mentioned Jazz in my last paragraph, it’s temporary and would have been more but it weakened AC management’s negotiations so they kiboshed it! Learn about reading comprehension, something you may be lacking
Oh I read your comment just fine, I'm literally making fun of the idiocy of what you just said, and you can't seem to understand that. To spell it out for you I was simply highlighting the sheer stupidity of someone making an absolute statement followed up immediately by a contradiction. I thought the laughing emoji would have clued in even the thickest skulled boomers but I guess not! Oh well :rolleyes:
Ok there douchenozzle, take it easy!
FYI, Gen douche, a laughing emoji is just that, it’s laughing out loud, maybe you thought it was funny. However, read your “statement”, that’s what it is, it’s comes across as a statement not a comment on what I said. You need to be more clear about your intent, it’s still not clear with the words you used that you were poking fun. You want to be more clear, try quoting my words and adding a 😂, that’s clear, what you wrote in your own words conveys something else, mmmm, k?
So, for clarity, cause that’s what you idiots need, it’s a TEMPORARY measure and there is no way that when the dust settles our starting pay will be more than AC, capeesh! 🙄
And just so there’s no mistaking what I mean, AC would rather let us cancel flights than pay us more, they will redeploy their other assets on regional routes instead of that, our pay should be around 80k minimum to start but AC is having no part in that!
---------- ADS -----------
 
Landingstrip
Rank 1
Rank 1
Posts: 39
Joined: Mon Apr 29, 2024 9:17 am

Re: Reasons Canadian Pilots think they’re less?

Post by Landingstrip »

cdnavater wrote: Mon Apr 29, 2024 7:40 am
pitottubey wrote: Sun Apr 28, 2024 7:49 pm
cdnavater wrote: Fri Apr 26, 2024 1:46 pm

I literally mentioned Jazz in my last paragraph, it’s temporary and would have been more but it weakened AC management’s negotiations so they kiboshed it! Learn about reading comprehension, something you may be lacking
Oh I read your comment just fine, I'm literally making fun of the idiocy of what you just said, and you can't seem to understand that. To spell it out for you I was simply highlighting the sheer stupidity of someone making an absolute statement followed up immediately by a contradiction. I thought the laughing emoji would have clued in even the thickest skulled boomers but I guess not! Oh well :rolleyes:
Ok there douchenozzle, take it easy!
FYI, Gen douche, a laughing emoji is just that, it’s laughing out loud, maybe you thought it was funny. However, read your “statement”, that’s what it is, it’s comes across as a statement not a comment on what I said. You need to be more clear about your intent, it’s still not clear with the words you used that you were poking fun. You want to be more clear, try quoting my words and adding a 😂, that’s clear, what you wrote in your own words conveys something else, mmmm, k?
So, for clarity, cause that’s what you idiots need, it’s a TEMPORARY measure and there is no way that when the dust settles our starting pay will be more than AC, capeesh! 🙄
And just so there’s no mistaking what I mean, AC would rather let us cancel flights than pay us more, they will redeploy their other assets on regional routes instead of that, our pay should be around 80k minimum to start but AC is having no part in that!
Man you insult pitot for a teasing joke and then cry foul when he claps back? Don't dish it if you cant take it. And yes making an absolute statement never ever ever except for this one example right now currently, is laughable. Chill tf out
---------- ADS -----------
 
Post Reply

Return to “General Airline Industry Comments”