67% yes
Moderators: lilfssister, North Shore, sky's the limit, sepia, Sulako, I WAS Birddog
Re: 67% yes
The number of times Captains cheap out on tips for the shuttle/taxi drivers is crazy, no excuse before and definitely they have no excuse now with new TA, I'll be sure to tear a strip off them if they do. A drink covered once and a while would be nice too lol.
-
newlygrounded
- Rank 7

- Posts: 668
- Joined: Wed Nov 25, 2020 8:28 pm
Re: 67% yes
I understand your sentiment and would usually agree but:
The union promised the world and came up short. Did people vote because they thought it lived up to what they wanted OR did the labor minister in the room during negotiations and union stewards mentioning arbitration is a realistic outcome of a no vote sway people into voting for the best they thought they could get?
Re: 67% yes
Not to mention the cowardly MEC chair saying "if you don't vote this in, I'll quit and leave you in the lurch."newlygrounded wrote: ↑Thu Oct 10, 2024 9:22 amI understand your sentiment and would usually agree but:
The union promised the world and came up short. Did people vote because they thought it lived up to what they wanted OR did the labor minister in the room during negotiations and union stewards mentioning arbitration is a realistic outcome of a no vote sway people into voting for the best they thought they could get?
Disgusting, embarrassing behavior.
Re: 67% yes
Actually they have a valid excuse to not tip now. We lost our gratuity allowance.walkabout wrote: ↑Thu Oct 10, 2024 9:15 am The number of times Captains cheap out on tips for the shuttle/taxi drivers is crazy, no excuse before and definitely they have no excuse now with new TA, I'll be sure to tear a strip off them if they do. A drink covered once and a while would be nice too lol.
-
newlygrounded
- Rank 7

- Posts: 668
- Joined: Wed Nov 25, 2020 8:28 pm
Re: 67% yes
This is so true. The company pulled out so much BS to, yeah you can be a captain in 4 years if you want to work 20+ days a month with zero Christmas, holidays or new years off for a decade.RoAF-Mig21 wrote: ↑Thu Oct 10, 2024 8:47 am Air Canada was my one hope that things can be better in this country. The low (starting pay) and (high) cost of living in YYZ, YVR, YUL just makes this unbearable.
Q: How will someone like me with a mortgage and a family be able to make this work? When is the reward no longer worth the effort? At what point does one say "The work/life balance" is not adequate for somone in my possition? How do I raise a family in the GTA? When will this "short term pain for long term gain" end?
A: It doesn't matter. There are plenty of young pilots that don't have those problems. There are plenty of them that live with mom and dad in YYZ and AC will NEVER be short on pilots. Like my dad put it "You missed the train, my son... Now you have to walk"
They (AC) knew that... and played their cards right.
I for one am at a loss of words...
My opinion has always been 90% of pilots cannot see themselves doing another job, and like like the film industry they're going to be exploited forever
JustaCanadian wrote: ↑Thu Oct 10, 2024 8:51 am Didn't 600 junior pilots get years of service? I would think that is meaningful and not something an arbitrator would really consider in a contract.
Anyways there is such thing as just a Canadian pilot. It's not that you are a pilot, it is in fact that you are Canadian. Canadians are different. Canadians love socialism, they love taxes. If we paid 10 percent more carbon tax we could have prevented hurricane Milton right?
The trend we are on has nothing to do with being pilots and everything to do with our country as a whole and our government. I'm sorry to say but Canadians have little interest in being more like America. Or they want to cherry pick the good things but ignore the bad. It's a package deal you get here.
Think of Jordan Petersons take on the several reasons women may be paid less in the workplace. The generalizations, such as being less competitive, more compassionate etc.
Canadains are more like women, Americans are more like Men when it comes to our political landscape. If you want to be paid like an American, take the package as whole and embrace what it means to be American.
I don't think this is a totally fair take. Look how the US regionals and Majors were in the 90s? Bankruptcy's left and right. At least there was stability here. Then covid came around and the company didn't even take CEWS. I think the balance is different now and we are objectively far behind.
Last edited by newlygrounded on Thu Oct 10, 2024 9:30 am, edited 1 time in total.
Re: 67% yes
Thats called a risk analysis. Sometimes taking the sure thing outweighs the risk.
In 1998 pilots went on strike and camenout with 2 extra shirts and a shoe allowance. In 2014, AC pilots lost $50M in arbitration.
Sometimes when you roll the dice you win (WJ AME), sometime you lose.
Re: 67% yes
The obvious reason that any WJ pilot would be a cheerleader for this agreement is the ability to use the (top scale) pay rates and pension contribution rates for benchmarking purposes when their own CBA opens.
WJ pilots already have QOL. You won’t see them asking for AC work rules or scheduling rules.
Re: 67% yes
You didn't lose it, that amount was rolled into the new TAFB per diem system. Which overall is a 30% increase over the old system (tax fee).Actually they have a valid excuse to not tip now. We lost our gratuity allowance.
Re: 67% yes
“Rolled into” is another way of saying “used to finance the new increase” It’s not a 30% raise when you give up some else to get it.
Re: 67% yes
Duh, that's how pattern bargaining works, building on the strengths of each others collective agreements. WJ will fight to close their pay gap and we'll draw from their better QOL.
The obvious reason that any WJ pilot would be a cheerleader for this agreement is the ability to use the (top scale) pay rates and pension contribution rates for benchmarking purposes when their own CBA opens.
WJ pilots already have QOL. You won’t see them asking for AC work rules or scheduling rules.
Re: 67% yes
Spoken like someone who's never talked to anyone on the negots committee.
-
newlygrounded
- Rank 7

- Posts: 668
- Joined: Wed Nov 25, 2020 8:28 pm
Re: 67% yes
WS doesn't have dozens of shiny WB planes to tempt their FO's to IG worthy destinationsMr. North wrote: ↑Thu Oct 10, 2024 9:38 amDuh, that's how pattern bargaining works, building on the strengths of each others collective agreements. WJ will fight to close their pay gap and we'll draw from their better QOL.
The obvious reason that any WJ pilot would be a cheerleader for this agreement is the ability to use the (top scale) pay rates and pension contribution rates for benchmarking purposes when their own CBA opens.
WJ pilots already have QOL. You won’t see them asking for AC work rules or scheduling rules.
-
BrassCraft
- Rank 1

- Posts: 20
- Joined: Sun Sep 22, 2024 3:30 pm
-
Pilotguy007
- Rank 0

- Posts: 9
- Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 9:24 am
Re: 67% yes
I hope when wj goes into negotiations next year they say we are not aircanada pilots. We deserve more
.
-
furloughedAC
- Rank 1

- Posts: 15
- Joined: Thu Apr 01, 2021 6:43 am
Re: 67% yes
Not necessarily. I benefit a ton from this TA going through. YOS gained back. Still voted no simply because I was willing to gamble that we could do better. I think there's a multitude of reasons why two thirds voted yes.
Re: 67% yes
You raise a valid point, but I wouldn't call myself cheerleadering the agreement. TBH, I don't really like it, but not for the reasons that most of the posters on here are against it.rudder wrote: ↑Thu Oct 10, 2024 9:30 am The obvious reason that any WJ pilot would be a cheerleader for this agreement is the ability to use the (top scale) pay rates and pension contribution rates for benchmarking purposes when their own CBA opens.
WJ pilots already have QOL. You won’t see them asking for AC work rules or scheduling rules.
I will freely admit though I will cheerleader the union leadership at AC. If they say it's the best they can do, I would believe them. I
-
freighter27
- Rank 1

- Posts: 24
- Joined: Tue May 03, 2011 8:22 pm
Re: 67% yes
One of the most idiotic comments ever, taken in isolation...
A huge proportion of pairings will reportedly get much higher expense allowances by using TAFB.
Can I follow the "logic" here? According to the complaints; even though the total expense reimbursement is higher, there is no longer a gratuity amount included, so I am not going to pay the driver a tip. By the same reasoning, there is no longer a breakfast, lunch, dinner or snack amount included,, do I now not get to eat? What do I do with all this expense money? If no one tells me what it is for, how on earth will I know how to spend it????
Re: 67% yes
FYI, Porter has a TAFB set up for per diem and also has a tipping credit paid separately for this very issue.
-
freighter27
- Rank 1

- Posts: 24
- Joined: Tue May 03, 2011 8:22 pm
Re: 67% yes
Like I said - shill.Bede wrote: ↑Thu Oct 10, 2024 10:07 am You raise a valid point, but I wouldn't call myself cheerleadering the agreement. TBH, I don't really like it, but not for the reasons that most of the posters on here are against it.
I will freely admit though I will cheerleader the union leadership at AC. If they say it's the best they can do, I would believe them. I
I don't understand how you can defend this MEC/LEC in the vote for this TA and their actions since they presented it. It was a concerted effort to influence the membership into voting this in with what boils down to blackmail. These are not the actions of a union with their membership's interests at heart. They lied to our faces and squandered a position with the greatest leverage we ever had (or likely will have) to force a deal that benefits the company over its pilots.
Re: 67% yes
I’m an E2 FO making more than my friends flying WB at AC. Not only do I not need to be reminded to eat, but unlike my friends I can actually afford rent!
Re: 67% yes
Ok, thepoors, it’s time for you to put up or stfu, you have a couple years to get involved in the union and make a difference, show them how it’s done!thepoors wrote: ↑Thu Oct 10, 2024 10:24 amLike I said - shill.Bede wrote: ↑Thu Oct 10, 2024 10:07 am You raise a valid point, but I wouldn't call myself cheerleadering the agreement. TBH, I don't really like it, but not for the reasons that most of the posters on here are against it.
I will freely admit though I will cheerleader the union leadership at AC. If they say it's the best they can do, I would believe them. I
I don't understand how you can defend this MEC/LEC in the vote for this TA and their actions since they presented it. It was a concerted effort to influence the membership into voting this in with what boils down to blackmail. These are not the actions of a union with their membership's interests at heart. They lied to our faces and squandered a position with the greatest leverage we ever had (or likely will have) to force a deal that benefits the company over its pilots.





