Aerkavo wrote: ↑Sat Dec 07, 2024 8:18 am
JustaCanadian wrote: ↑Fri Dec 06, 2024 7:51 pm
Your coffee doesn't come with a doughnut, but you can pay to add it if you like. This is just the typical airline bitchfest about prices, while air travel inflation is below many other sectors.
Your coffee doesn't come with a doughnut but it does come with cream and sugar. This is the issue; carryon baggage has been part of the travel protocol for so long that it's now considered, well, part of the normal product. Sure, you can try to teach people that their carryon
isn't a part of the ticket price but there will be blowback.
I used to go to a restaurant that would add 5 cents a pack for crackers for your soup and 5 cents a pack for ketchup. We're talking pennies but people would bitch and complain because "crackers and ketchup are supposed to be free".
One could look at this one of two ways -
1. A fare includes a seat, the space on the floor in front of it, and a single space in the overhead bin above it. The fare may or may not include allowance for a checked bag in the cargo hold.
2. The fare includes just a seat. The floor in front of the seat may be purchased. A space in the overhead bin may be purchased. A space in the cargo hold may be purchased.
Option 2 is the revenue strategy for a ULCC operator.
Perhaps AC wants to simply be perceived as ‘fare matching’ a segment of the inventory against competitors that advertise for seat purchase only. Regardless, it is disappointing to see a legacy and flag carrier have to deconstruct a fare to this level. The industry has changed and not in a good way. Pan Am would roll over in its grave.
While Flair (and others) chase the Greyhound bus crowd, carriers like Porter will just look better and better.