Which is Better for Aviation:

This forum has been developed to discuss aviation related topics.

Moderators: sky's the limit, sepia, Sulako, lilfssister, North Shore, I WAS Birddog

Post Reply

Which is better…for aviation….

10 more years of Trudeau
6
21%
Become the 51st state.
23
79%
 
Total votes: 29

tsgarp
Rank 7
Rank 7
Posts: 558
Joined: Thu Apr 01, 2004 3:18 pm

Which is Better for Aviation:

Post by tsgarp »

Interesting question.
---------- ADS -----------
 
Orion's Fannypack
Rank 0
Rank 0
Posts: 9
Joined: Sat May 21, 2022 9:03 am

Re: Which is Better for Aviation:

Post by Orion's Fannypack »

If Santa doesn't bring you what you ask for this year are you going to blame the Canada Post strike?
---------- ADS -----------
 
cdnavater
Rank 10
Rank 10
Posts: 2497
Joined: Wed Apr 21, 2021 11:25 am

Re: Which is Better for Aviation:

Post by cdnavater »

10 more years of Trudeau, aviation won’t matter, nobody will be able to afford to travel anyway
---------- ADS -----------
 
User avatar
‘Bob’
Rank (9)
Rank (9)
Posts: 1000
Joined: Fri Apr 23, 2021 10:19 am

Re: Which is Better for Aviation:

Post by ‘Bob’ »

I did far better under Trudeau in aviation and in general than I did under Harper.

Maybe correlation doesn’t imply causation.
---------- ADS -----------
 
Inverted2
Rank 11
Rank 11
Posts: 3868
Joined: Tue Mar 23, 2004 7:46 am

Re: Which is Better for Aviation:

Post by Inverted2 »

Trudope is politically finished and hopefully a bad memory before next October but he and his party have done so much damage that I don’t think the country will ever heal unfortunately.

If Trump takes over at least I might get to buy more guns and get cheap beer. :lol:
---------- ADS -----------
 
DEI = Didn’t Earn It
khedrei
Rank 7
Rank 7
Posts: 735
Joined: Tue Sep 13, 2016 2:27 pm

Re: Which is Better for Aviation:

Post by khedrei »

‘Bob’ wrote: Wed Dec 11, 2024 8:12 pm I did far better under Trudeau in aviation and in general than I did under Harper.

Maybe correlation doesn’t imply causation.
It doesnt count if you weren't living in canada.
---------- ADS -----------
 
Squaretail
Rank 7
Rank 7
Posts: 514
Joined: Mon Jan 22, 2018 12:27 pm

Re: Which is Better for Aviation:

Post by Squaretail »

Depends on who you are. If you own a FBO, you'd be getting some of that sweet, sweet government money from a military fuel contract. If you're anyone else like a working pilot or AME it would turn out worse when you have to renegotiate your wage when you have to lose part of it to pay for a health plan, among other losses. I've looked into moving to the US several times when job opportunities arose. Each time it was a wash. All gains were wiped out by healthcare costs, because even a good plan like a big oil company provides isn't as comprehensive as one might wish.

GA in Canada wouldn't improve much either because of, well, winter. Sure a bit more corporate jet traffic might come north, but it already does.

In all my time in aviation, when I've compared my wages and working conditions with my counterparts in the US who have similar experience level, I am always coming out on top. If you're a sub 1500 hour pilot, Canada becoming a state would be disastrous for you. The only thing that would be good would be a simplification of us taking on the FAA rules, though there are some bad things that would come with that too.
---------- ADS -----------
 
I'm not sure what's more depressing: That everyone has a price, or how low the price always is.
SpyPilot
Rank 3
Rank 3
Posts: 116
Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2011 5:48 pm

Re: Which is Better for Aviation:

Post by SpyPilot »

blah blah fucking blah
---------- ADS -----------
 
blutomindpretzel
Rank 0
Rank 0
Posts: 2
Joined: Tue Jan 04, 2022 8:52 am

Re: Which is Better for Aviation:

Post by blutomindpretzel »

Who are these anti-Canada nutsacks that keep spamming this board about becoming the 51st state? Traitors if you ask me. Can we ban these posters and delete their dumb as shit threads?
---------- ADS -----------
 
altiplano
Top Poster
Top Poster
Posts: 5660
Joined: Sat Jan 22, 2005 2:24 pm

Re: Which is Better for Aviation:

Post by altiplano »

We don't have to become 51st state, just integrate our air transport sector under the FAA.

A key difference is the FAA has a mandate to promote aviation, TC's only mandate is to act as a regulator.

Also nationalize the airports. Get rid of under pay. No more art and waterfall installations. Build EMAS not malls. Eliminate curfews.
---------- ADS -----------
 
goingnowherefast
Rank 10
Rank 10
Posts: 2360
Joined: Wed Mar 13, 2013 9:24 am

Re: Which is Better for Aviation:

Post by goingnowherefast »

altiplano wrote: Thu Dec 12, 2024 11:06 am We don't have to become 51st state, just integrate our air transport sector under the FAA.

A key difference is the FAA has a mandate to promote aviation, TC's only mandate is to act as a regulator.

Also nationalize the airports. Get rid of under pay. No more art and waterfall installations. Build EMAS not malls. Eliminate curfews.
About the only thing that makes sense in this thread.

FAA ATC and airports are much happier to accommodate GA traffic too.
---------- ADS -----------
 
Post Reply

Return to “General Comments”