Sealand Flight Cessna 172 crashes near Nanaimo

Topics related to accidents, incidents & over due aircraft should be placed in this forum.

Moderators: lilfssister, North Shore, sky's the limit, sepia, Sulako

Post Reply
User avatar
Jean-Pierre
Rank 7
Rank 7
Posts: 501
Joined: Sun Oct 04, 2009 4:56 pm

Sealand Flight Cessna 172 crashes near Nanaimo

Post by Jean-Pierre »

The pilot is deceased unfortunately. Witness state it occurred around 3am. He stated it was misty, though that was at 7am.

https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/british- ... -9.6995059
---------- ADS -----------
 
User avatar
Jean-Pierre
Rank 7
Rank 7
Posts: 501
Joined: Sun Oct 04, 2009 4:56 pm

Re: Sealand Flight Cessna 172 crashes near Nanaimo

Post by Jean-Pierre »

The area of the crash appears to have rising terrain.
Screenshot_20251127_153119_Firefox~2.jpg
Screenshot_20251127_153119_Firefox~2.jpg (200.69 KiB) Viewed 1604 times
---------- ADS -----------
 
Me262
Rank 7
Rank 7
Posts: 603
Joined: Wed Mar 09, 2016 6:35 pm

Re: Sealand Flight Cessna 172 crashes near Nanaimo

Post by Me262 »

Seems like CFIT. Unfortunately we will never know since Cessnas don't carry FDRs
---------- ADS -----------
 
digits_
Top Poster
Top Poster
Posts: 6935
Joined: Mon Feb 14, 2011 2:26 am

Re: Sealand Flight Cessna 172 crashes near Nanaimo

Post by digits_ »

Very unusual to have a c172 fly around at 3 am.
---------- ADS -----------
 
As an AvCanada discussion grows longer:
-the probability of 'entitlement' being mentioned, approaches 1
-one will be accused of using bad airmanship
Me262
Rank 7
Rank 7
Posts: 603
Joined: Wed Mar 09, 2016 6:35 pm

Re: Sealand Flight Cessna 172 crashes near Nanaimo

Post by Me262 »

digits_ wrote: Thu Nov 27, 2025 4:53 pm Very unusual to have a c172 fly around at 3 am.
Let's all thank TC retarded requirements where super low timer students need to either fly at 3am for Night CX PIC or fly 300NM radius in a single engine piston over Rockies in winter. Very safe indeed.
---------- ADS -----------
 
Dry Guy
Rank 7
Rank 7
Posts: 541
Joined: Mon Apr 17, 2017 2:44 pm

Re: Sealand Flight Cessna 172 crashes near Nanaimo

Post by Dry Guy »

What is going on with flight training schools? I can't remember a year with so many fatalities.
---------- ADS -----------
 
digits_
Top Poster
Top Poster
Posts: 6935
Joined: Mon Feb 14, 2011 2:26 am

Re: Sealand Flight Cessna 172 crashes near Nanaimo

Post by digits_ »

Me262 wrote: Thu Nov 27, 2025 5:04 pm
digits_ wrote: Thu Nov 27, 2025 4:53 pm Very unusual to have a c172 fly around at 3 am.
Let's all thank TC retarded requirements where super low timer students need to either fly at 3am for Night CX PIC or fly 300NM radius in a single engine piston over Rockies in winter. Very safe indeed.
If time building was the goal, it could just as well have been done at 10pm. I like a good TC bashing at times but I don't see a link with this one.
---------- ADS -----------
 
As an AvCanada discussion grows longer:
-the probability of 'entitlement' being mentioned, approaches 1
-one will be accused of using bad airmanship
Dry Guy
Rank 7
Rank 7
Posts: 541
Joined: Mon Apr 17, 2017 2:44 pm

Re: Sealand Flight Cessna 172 crashes near Nanaimo

Post by Dry Guy »

10pm dark is safer than 3am dark because it's earlier.
---------- ADS -----------
 
digits_
Top Poster
Top Poster
Posts: 6935
Joined: Mon Feb 14, 2011 2:26 am

Re: Sealand Flight Cessna 172 crashes near Nanaimo

Post by digits_ »

Dry Guy wrote: Thu Nov 27, 2025 5:22 pm 10pm dark is safer than 3am dark because it's earlier.
Well yes, generally. Especially for training flights. Less chance for fatigue. Weather closer to what you actually saw during day time. But perhaps the pilot was on a night circadian rhythm for whatever reason and this wasn't a factor. Just thought it was noteworthy.
---------- ADS -----------
 
As an AvCanada discussion grows longer:
-the probability of 'entitlement' being mentioned, approaches 1
-one will be accused of using bad airmanship
User avatar
‘Bob’
Rank (9)
Rank (9)
Posts: 1085
Joined: Fri Apr 23, 2021 10:19 am

Re: Sealand Flight Cessna 172 crashes near Nanaimo

Post by ‘Bob’ »

Dry Guy wrote: Thu Nov 27, 2025 5:22 pm 10pm dark is safer than 3am dark because it's earlier.
It literally is. Look up circadian rhythms.

RIP and condolences to those affected.
---------- ADS -----------
 
PropsForwardGearDown
Rank 0
Rank 0
Posts: 1
Joined: Mon Aug 11, 2025 7:24 pm

Re: Sealand Flight Cessna 172 crashes near Nanaimo

Post by PropsForwardGearDown »

I remember flying ZBB - YBL - YCD - YYJ - ZBB during the night rating and time building phase, not really what I’d call a comfortable flight in a VFR piston single at night, especially at 3am in late November. Hopefully not a case of someone pushing their limits to meet a night time requirement. RIP to the victim.
---------- ADS -----------
 
scdriver
Rank 4
Rank 4
Posts: 248
Joined: Mon Mar 15, 2021 3:09 pm

Re: Sealand Flight Cessna 172 crashes near Nanaimo

Post by scdriver »

It was ugly all day yesterday and this morning. Certainly not the kind of wx anyone should be bombing around in VFR at night. Shitty one
---------- ADS -----------
 
SpyPilot
Rank 3
Rank 3
Posts: 137
Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2011 5:48 pm

Re: Sealand Flight Cessna 172 crashes near Nanaimo

Post by SpyPilot »

.
---------- ADS -----------
 
Last edited by SpyPilot on Sat Nov 29, 2025 1:16 am, edited 2 times in total.
SpyPilot
Rank 3
Rank 3
Posts: 137
Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2011 5:48 pm

Re: Sealand Flight Cessna 172 crashes near Nanaimo

Post by SpyPilot »

‘Bob’ wrote: Thu Nov 27, 2025 6:43 pm
Dry Guy wrote: Thu Nov 27, 2025 5:22 pm 10pm dark is safer than 3am dark because it's earlier.
Hogwash

And just how is that exactly?

It literally is. Look up circadian rhythms.
Hogwash

Look up maybe working a 4pm to midnight shift and going to the airport to log some (admittedly poor WX decision) night hours.
---------- ADS -----------
 
cdnavater
Rank 10
Rank 10
Posts: 2741
Joined: Wed Apr 21, 2021 11:25 am

Re: Sealand Flight Cessna 172 crashes near Nanaimo

Post by cdnavater »

SpyPilot wrote: Fri Nov 28, 2025 12:57 am
‘Bob’ wrote: Thu Nov 27, 2025 6:43 pm
Dry Guy wrote: Thu Nov 27, 2025 5:22 pm 10pm dark is safer than 3am dark because it's earlier.
Hogwash

And just how is that exactly?

It literally is. Look up circadian rhythms.
Hogwash

Look up maybe working a 4pm to midnight shift and going to the airport to log some (admittedly poor WX decision) night hours.
You’re disputing a scientific fact? Even shift workers are not immune to the natural circadian rhythm!

“Shift work disrupts the body's circadian rhythm, a natural 24-hour cycle, leading to health problems like sleep disorders, increased risk of accidents, metabolic disorders, and other issues.”
---------- ADS -----------
 
User avatar
Daniel Cooper
Rank 6
Rank 6
Posts: 472
Joined: Thu Dec 20, 2018 6:38 am
Location: Unknown

Re: Sealand Flight Cessna 172 crashes near Nanaimo

Post by Daniel Cooper »

I really don't think they flew into a mountain because of circadian rhythms.
---------- ADS -----------
 
SpyPilot
Rank 3
Rank 3
Posts: 137
Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2011 5:48 pm

Re: Sealand Flight Cessna 172 crashes near Nanaimo

Post by SpyPilot »

What he said.

In a year or two when the TSB release their official findings and if CR is listed anywhere in the report, I'll eat my hat.
---------- ADS -----------
 
cdnavater
Rank 10
Rank 10
Posts: 2741
Joined: Wed Apr 21, 2021 11:25 am

Re: Sealand Flight Cessna 172 crashes near Nanaimo

Post by cdnavater »

SpyPilot wrote: Sat Nov 29, 2025 1:09 am What he said.

In a year or two when the TSB release their official findings and if CR is listed anywhere in the report, I'll eat my hat.
Unless this was an intentional act, they will mention fatigue as a factor, will they actually use the words circadian rhythm, maybe.
I’m not saying this was a big factor but the poster mentioned 10pm being safer dark than 3 am dark and your response was “hogwash”, which is disputing scientific fact!
There is a reason that if you start flying after midnight you are restricted to a much shorter duty day!
---------- ADS -----------
 
Post Reply

Return to “Accidents, Incidents & Overdue Aircraft”