Sealand Flight Cessna 172 crashes near Nanaimo

Topics related to accidents, incidents & over due aircraft should be placed in this forum.

Moderators: lilfssister, North Shore, sky's the limit, sepia, Sulako

Post Reply
User avatar
Jean-Pierre
Rank 7
Rank 7
Posts: 505
Joined: Sun Oct 04, 2009 4:56 pm

Sealand Flight Cessna 172 crashes near Nanaimo

Post by Jean-Pierre »

The pilot is deceased unfortunately. Witness state it occurred around 3am. He stated it was misty, though that was at 7am.

https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/british- ... -9.6995059
---------- ADS -----------
 
User avatar
Jean-Pierre
Rank 7
Rank 7
Posts: 505
Joined: Sun Oct 04, 2009 4:56 pm

Re: Sealand Flight Cessna 172 crashes near Nanaimo

Post by Jean-Pierre »

The area of the crash appears to have rising terrain.
Screenshot_20251127_153119_Firefox~2.jpg
Screenshot_20251127_153119_Firefox~2.jpg (200.69 KiB) Viewed 2454 times
---------- ADS -----------
 
Me262
Rank 7
Rank 7
Posts: 616
Joined: Wed Mar 09, 2016 6:35 pm

Re: Sealand Flight Cessna 172 crashes near Nanaimo

Post by Me262 »

Seems like CFIT. Unfortunately we will never know since Cessnas don't carry FDRs
---------- ADS -----------
 
digits_
Top Poster
Top Poster
Posts: 6996
Joined: Mon Feb 14, 2011 2:26 am

Re: Sealand Flight Cessna 172 crashes near Nanaimo

Post by digits_ »

Very unusual to have a c172 fly around at 3 am.
---------- ADS -----------
 
As an AvCanada discussion grows longer:
-the probability of 'entitlement' being mentioned, approaches 1
-one will be accused of using bad airmanship
Me262
Rank 7
Rank 7
Posts: 616
Joined: Wed Mar 09, 2016 6:35 pm

Re: Sealand Flight Cessna 172 crashes near Nanaimo

Post by Me262 »

digits_ wrote: Thu Nov 27, 2025 4:53 pm Very unusual to have a c172 fly around at 3 am.
Let's all thank TC retarded requirements where super low timer students need to either fly at 3am for Night CX PIC or fly 300NM radius in a single engine piston over Rockies in winter. Very safe indeed.
---------- ADS -----------
 
Dry Guy
Rank 7
Rank 7
Posts: 581
Joined: Mon Apr 17, 2017 2:44 pm

Re: Sealand Flight Cessna 172 crashes near Nanaimo

Post by Dry Guy »

What is going on with flight training schools? I can't remember a year with so many fatalities.
---------- ADS -----------
 
digits_
Top Poster
Top Poster
Posts: 6996
Joined: Mon Feb 14, 2011 2:26 am

Re: Sealand Flight Cessna 172 crashes near Nanaimo

Post by digits_ »

Me262 wrote: Thu Nov 27, 2025 5:04 pm
digits_ wrote: Thu Nov 27, 2025 4:53 pm Very unusual to have a c172 fly around at 3 am.
Let's all thank TC retarded requirements where super low timer students need to either fly at 3am for Night CX PIC or fly 300NM radius in a single engine piston over Rockies in winter. Very safe indeed.
If time building was the goal, it could just as well have been done at 10pm. I like a good TC bashing at times but I don't see a link with this one.
---------- ADS -----------
 
As an AvCanada discussion grows longer:
-the probability of 'entitlement' being mentioned, approaches 1
-one will be accused of using bad airmanship
Dry Guy
Rank 7
Rank 7
Posts: 581
Joined: Mon Apr 17, 2017 2:44 pm

Re: Sealand Flight Cessna 172 crashes near Nanaimo

Post by Dry Guy »

10pm dark is safer than 3am dark because it's earlier.
---------- ADS -----------
 
digits_
Top Poster
Top Poster
Posts: 6996
Joined: Mon Feb 14, 2011 2:26 am

Re: Sealand Flight Cessna 172 crashes near Nanaimo

Post by digits_ »

Dry Guy wrote: Thu Nov 27, 2025 5:22 pm 10pm dark is safer than 3am dark because it's earlier.
Well yes, generally. Especially for training flights. Less chance for fatigue. Weather closer to what you actually saw during day time. But perhaps the pilot was on a night circadian rhythm for whatever reason and this wasn't a factor. Just thought it was noteworthy.
---------- ADS -----------
 
As an AvCanada discussion grows longer:
-the probability of 'entitlement' being mentioned, approaches 1
-one will be accused of using bad airmanship
User avatar
‘Bob’
Rank (9)
Rank (9)
Posts: 1103
Joined: Fri Apr 23, 2021 10:19 am

Re: Sealand Flight Cessna 172 crashes near Nanaimo

Post by ‘Bob’ »

Dry Guy wrote: Thu Nov 27, 2025 5:22 pm 10pm dark is safer than 3am dark because it's earlier.
It literally is. Look up circadian rhythms.

RIP and condolences to those affected.
---------- ADS -----------
 
PropsForwardGearDown
Rank 0
Rank 0
Posts: 1
Joined: Mon Aug 11, 2025 7:24 pm

Re: Sealand Flight Cessna 172 crashes near Nanaimo

Post by PropsForwardGearDown »

I remember flying ZBB - YBL - YCD - YYJ - ZBB during the night rating and time building phase, not really what I’d call a comfortable flight in a VFR piston single at night, especially at 3am in late November. Hopefully not a case of someone pushing their limits to meet a night time requirement. RIP to the victim.
---------- ADS -----------
 
scdriver
Rank 4
Rank 4
Posts: 256
Joined: Mon Mar 15, 2021 3:09 pm

Re: Sealand Flight Cessna 172 crashes near Nanaimo

Post by scdriver »

It was ugly all day yesterday and this morning. Certainly not the kind of wx anyone should be bombing around in VFR at night. Shitty one
---------- ADS -----------
 
SpyPilot
Rank 3
Rank 3
Posts: 152
Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2011 5:48 pm

Re: Sealand Flight Cessna 172 crashes near Nanaimo

Post by SpyPilot »

.
---------- ADS -----------
 
Last edited by SpyPilot on Sat Nov 29, 2025 1:16 am, edited 2 times in total.
SpyPilot
Rank 3
Rank 3
Posts: 152
Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2011 5:48 pm

Re: Sealand Flight Cessna 172 crashes near Nanaimo

Post by SpyPilot »

‘Bob’ wrote: Thu Nov 27, 2025 6:43 pm
Dry Guy wrote: Thu Nov 27, 2025 5:22 pm 10pm dark is safer than 3am dark because it's earlier.
Hogwash

And just how is that exactly?

It literally is. Look up circadian rhythms.
Hogwash

Look up maybe working a 4pm to midnight shift and going to the airport to log some (admittedly poor WX decision) night hours.
---------- ADS -----------
 
cdnavater
Rank 10
Rank 10
Posts: 2846
Joined: Wed Apr 21, 2021 11:25 am

Re: Sealand Flight Cessna 172 crashes near Nanaimo

Post by cdnavater »

SpyPilot wrote: Fri Nov 28, 2025 12:57 am
‘Bob’ wrote: Thu Nov 27, 2025 6:43 pm
Dry Guy wrote: Thu Nov 27, 2025 5:22 pm 10pm dark is safer than 3am dark because it's earlier.
Hogwash

And just how is that exactly?

It literally is. Look up circadian rhythms.
Hogwash

Look up maybe working a 4pm to midnight shift and going to the airport to log some (admittedly poor WX decision) night hours.
You’re disputing a scientific fact? Even shift workers are not immune to the natural circadian rhythm!

“Shift work disrupts the body's circadian rhythm, a natural 24-hour cycle, leading to health problems like sleep disorders, increased risk of accidents, metabolic disorders, and other issues.”
---------- ADS -----------
 
User avatar
Daniel Cooper
Rank 6
Rank 6
Posts: 487
Joined: Thu Dec 20, 2018 6:38 am
Location: Unknown

Re: Sealand Flight Cessna 172 crashes near Nanaimo

Post by Daniel Cooper »

I really don't think they flew into a mountain because of circadian rhythms.
---------- ADS -----------
 
SpyPilot
Rank 3
Rank 3
Posts: 152
Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2011 5:48 pm

Re: Sealand Flight Cessna 172 crashes near Nanaimo

Post by SpyPilot »

What he said.

In a year or two when the TSB release their official findings and if CR is listed anywhere in the report, I'll eat my hat.
---------- ADS -----------
 
cdnavater
Rank 10
Rank 10
Posts: 2846
Joined: Wed Apr 21, 2021 11:25 am

Re: Sealand Flight Cessna 172 crashes near Nanaimo

Post by cdnavater »

SpyPilot wrote: Sat Nov 29, 2025 1:09 am What he said.

In a year or two when the TSB release their official findings and if CR is listed anywhere in the report, I'll eat my hat.
Unless this was an intentional act, they will mention fatigue as a factor, will they actually use the words circadian rhythm, maybe.
I’m not saying this was a big factor but the poster mentioned 10pm being safer dark than 3 am dark and your response was “hogwash”, which is disputing scientific fact!
There is a reason that if you start flying after midnight you are restricted to a much shorter duty day!
---------- ADS -----------
 
pelmet
Top Poster
Top Poster
Posts: 7933
Joined: Tue Jun 14, 2005 2:48 pm

Re: Sealand Flight Cessna 172 crashes near Nanaimo

Post by pelmet »

From TSB...

C-GFYW, a Sealand Flight Limited Cessna 172M, departed Nanaimo Airport (CYCD), BC, on an
unscheduled flight of which the aircraft owner was unaware. Only the pilot was on board. The
aircraft departed Runway 34 at CYCD at approximately 0300 Pacific Standard Time (PST) and
collided with terrain at approximately 0304 PST. The pilot received fatal injuries. The aircraft was
destroyed. The aircraft emergency locator transmitter (ELT) did not produce a signal that was
relayed to the Joint Rescue Coordination Centre.
The occurrence pilot was a Sealand employee. The pilot held a commercial pilot license with a
class 3 instructor rating, and a valid category 1 medical. The pilot had approximately 511 hours
total documented flight time.
Video evidence showed that the aircraft took off without the pilot activating the aerodrome lighting.
After takeoff, the aircraft climbed on runway heading for approximately 35 seconds before turning
west. The aircraft then traveled 4.3 nautical miles (NM) west before it impacted terrain. A security
camera, located approximately 550 m from the crash site, recorded the sound of the aircraft engine
at high rpm, with engine sound increasing as the aircraft approached the ground. The audio
recording indicated the aircraft struck terrain at 0304:31 PST.
The aircraft wreckage was found approximately 4.5 NM WNW of CYCD near a public street and
several houses. Wreckage was consistent with a high energy impact, and the aircraft propeller
showed signs that it was producing power at the time the aircraft collided with terrain. The smell of
aviation fuel was noted at the site, and it was determined that the occurrence aircraft had been fully
fueled following its previous flight, the day before the occurrence. The investigation could not
establish control continuity due to the degree of damage suffered by the aircraft. The aircraft ELT
was found separated from the airframe at the crash site, with the ELT switch in the off position, but
it is not known when or how the switch came to be in that position.


....fairly obvious.
---------- ADS -----------
 
PostmasterGeneral
Rank 8
Rank 8
Posts: 996
Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2009 3:50 pm

Re: Sealand Flight Cessna 172 crashes near Nanaimo

Post by PostmasterGeneral »

At least nobody else got hurt.

That’s pretty inconvenient for a small flight school like that, hopefully insurance also compensates them for the revenue lost while they procure another aircraft.
---------- ADS -----------
 
Dry Guy
Rank 7
Rank 7
Posts: 581
Joined: Mon Apr 17, 2017 2:44 pm

Re: Sealand Flight Cessna 172 crashes near Nanaimo

Post by Dry Guy »

pelmet wrote: Mon Feb 02, 2026 7:00 pm ....fairly obvious.
Circadian rhythms?
---------- ADS -----------
 
pelmet
Top Poster
Top Poster
Posts: 7933
Joined: Tue Jun 14, 2005 2:48 pm

Re: Sealand Flight Cessna 172 crashes near Nanaimo

Post by pelmet »

Dry Guy wrote: Tue Feb 03, 2026 12:18 am
pelmet wrote: Mon Feb 02, 2026 7:00 pm ....fairly obvious.
Circadian rhythms?
Obviously.
---------- ADS -----------
 
cdnavater
Rank 10
Rank 10
Posts: 2846
Joined: Wed Apr 21, 2021 11:25 am

Re: Sealand Flight Cessna 172 crashes near Nanaimo

Post by cdnavater »

Dry Guy wrote: Tue Feb 03, 2026 12:18 am
pelmet wrote: Mon Feb 02, 2026 7:00 pm ....fairly obvious.
Circadian rhythms?
I think it’s a good thing that nobody immediately came to a conclusion of suicide, obviously fatigue was not a factor, sad.
---------- ADS -----------
 
shamrock104
Rank 8
Rank 8
Posts: 831
Joined: Sun Oct 30, 2005 9:16 pm

Re: Sealand Flight Cessna 172 crashes near Nanaimo

Post by shamrock104 »

This is very sad, no one knows what was going on in this Pilot's life and it is unfortunate that they did not seek help. Glad no one on the ground was hurt.
---------- ADS -----------
 
Post Reply

Return to “Accidents, Incidents & Overdue Aircraft”