If it's now a manslaughter case would they still release everything to the public?cncpc wrote: ↑Wed Aug 26, 2026 6:35 pm If fuel exhaustion caused this crash, the tanks would have been empty sitting there on the side of the road. TSB will have checked them by now. To their credit, they have recently been divulging key information within days of accidents. Certainly, I would expect them to have said the aircraft ran out of fuel by now. How did that happen? Yes, that is for down the road. But empty tanks, there is no reason for holding that back.
Was there a Mayday when the left quit? If there was, what did the pilot say his intentions were? Surely he couldn't have said, "Landing on a road" with fuel and the right engine doing just fine.
BE20 forced landing Prince George
Moderators: sky's the limit, sepia, Sulako, lilfssister, North Shore
- Daniel Cooper
- Rank 7

- Posts: 540
- Joined: Thu Dec 20, 2018 6:38 am
- Location: Unknown
Re: BE20 forced landing Prince George
Re: BE20 forced landing Prince George
Not something that I would comment on at this stage. Or possibly at any stage. Not saying your question is not fair enough, but I expect most fair minded people would want to hear what the TSB has found before going down that road.
Good judgment comes from experience. Experience often comes from bad judgment.
Re: BE20 forced landing Prince George
Just took a few minutes to look at this ADSB track. Some things stand out. The GS seems to have dropped off a fair way back up north on the accident flight. It is down to 106 kts in the last few minutes, but it is generally lower for most of the returns in this screenshot. Where exactly did the left engine fail? I see considerably higher GS on the other flight that day for the maneuvering to land phase. The flight up had to be IFR, but the return seems to be much lower, and wandering.yrp wrote: ↑Mon Aug 24, 2026 2:10 pm Here is the ADS-B track from adsbexchange.com:
https://globe.adsbexchange.com/?icao=c0 ... rackLabels
Previous track for the day shown for comparison.
GEDV - Copy.png
Anybody got winds aloft at the time?
Good judgment comes from experience. Experience often comes from bad judgment.
-
propfeather
- Rank 3

- Posts: 164
- Joined: Wed Sep 20, 2017 5:27 pm
Re: BE20 forced landing Prince George
Looking at that data, it doesn't indicate just a simple engine failure.cncpc wrote: ↑Thu Aug 27, 2026 6:41 pm
Just took a few minutes to look at this ADSB track. Some things stand out. The GS seems to have dropped off a fair way back up north on the accident flight. It is down to 106 kts in the last few minutes, but it is generally lower for most of the returns in this screenshot. Where exactly did the left engine fail? I see considerably higher GS on the other flight that day for the maneuvering to land phase. The flight up had to be IFR, but the return seems to be much lower, and wandering.
Anybody got winds aloft at the time?
A king air 200 at 12500lbs should be able to maintain 15000asl on one engine, single engine TAS at 15k should be ~190kts if I remember correctly. Down at 5000 - 195ktas. Best range glide is 135kias.
They fly really well on one engine, so I don't see why you'd choose to descend and slow down, there had to be something else going on. Maybe flaps stuck down?
Radiosonde data from that day at YXS showed winds as out of the west at 10-15mph from the surface to 20000.
-
bobcaygeon
- Rank 7

- Posts: 734
- Joined: Sat Mar 12, 2005 8:03 am
Re: BE20 forced landing Prince George
TSB is brutally slow at releasing any info. A report last year took almost 3 years to release and there were no mysteries to solve. CVR/FDC/Pilots all intact. Cause was pretty obvious.cncpc wrote: ↑Wed Aug 26, 2026 6:35 pm If fuel exhaustion caused this crash, the tanks would have been empty sitting there on the side of the road. TSB will have checked them by now. To their credit, they have recently been divulging key information within days of accidents. Certainly, I would expect them to have said the aircraft ran out of fuel by now. How did that happen? Yes, that is for down the road. But empty tanks, there is no reason for holding that back.
Was there a Mayday when the left quit? If there was, what did the pilot say his intentions were? Surely he couldn't have said, "Landing on a road" with fuel and the right engine doing just fine.
Re: BE20 forced landing Prince George
Just got a call from a friend. The King Air was out of fuel. An analysis of fuel planning has showed that even if the planning was correct, they would have had three minutes of fuel left on landing at Prince George.
Following on from what Bob said above, I asked why TSB hasn't released this yet. Answer was "Because the two years isn't up".
Following on from what Bob said above, I asked why TSB hasn't released this yet. Answer was "Because the two years isn't up".
Good judgment comes from experience. Experience often comes from bad judgment.
Re: BE20 forced landing Prince George
How did this happen? Mathematical error on the form? Lots of diversions? Did they sign a flightplan that showed 3 minutes of fuel at destination?
As an AvCanada discussion grows longer:
-the probability of 'entitlement' being mentioned, approaches 1
-one will be accused of using bad airmanship
-the probability of 'entitlement' being mentioned, approaches 1
-one will be accused of using bad airmanship
-
propfeather
- Rank 3

- Posts: 164
- Joined: Wed Sep 20, 2017 5:27 pm
Re: BE20 forced landing Prince George
On an IFR flight too, wow. I don't like landing with less than an hour of fuel myself.
Re: BE20 forced landing Prince George
Most likely the OFP and W/B stated lbs of fuel on startup in PG. That that number was insufficient would be evidenced by empty tanks at the roadside. It seems that number was true as stated on the forms. Going through the 2 takeoff fuel burns and the inbound/outbound, I guess it was determined that in a best case scenario, they would have had 3 minutes of fuel left on landing at PG. So something was miscalculated from the flight planning stage. Right numbers in the form for fuel, but wrong calculation for burn rate, or non standard power setting?
Good judgment comes from experience. Experience often comes from bad judgment.
Re: BE20 forced landing Prince George
You can't seriously be suggesting that an experienced crew messed up the fuel flow numbers? Low fuel lights would probably have been glaring well before Mackenzie.
Re: BE20 forced landing Prince George
Low fuel lights in a King Air? There are low fuel pressure lights which are master warnings, but when those go on, you don't have much time before the engine flames out.
Here's a good read on those lights:
https://www.tsb.gc.ca/eng/rapports-repo ... c0038.html
Re: BE20 forced landing Prince George
No low fuel lights? No King Air time but the 441 had them and I only saw them illuminate once.
-
nine sixteenths
- Rank 3

- Posts: 142
- Joined: Tue Feb 19, 2013 6:49 am
Re: BE20 forced landing Prince George
Capacitance probe fuel quantity indication system, doesn’t take much for that to be out of calibration


