Instructor experience

This forum is for non aviation related topics, political debate, random thoughts, and everything else that just doesn't seem to fit in the normal forums. ALL FORUM RULES STILL APPLY.

Moderators: sky's the limit, sepia, Sulako, lilfssister, North Shore

Locked

Should new pilots be allowed to instruct?

Fine the way it is
12
27%
Should require 500 hours
7
16%
Should require 1000 hours
18
41%
Who cares instructing sucks anyways
7
16%
 
Total votes: 44

N2
Rank (9)
Rank (9)
Posts: 1301
Joined: Sun Feb 22, 2004 9:23 am
Location: Under witness protection!

Instructor experience

Post by N2 »

Do you feel it's sufficent to allow low time pilots to become flight instructors or should the flight experince level be raised? I.e. 500 hours PIC

PS In reference to class 4 rating.
---------- ADS -----------
 
Last edited by N2 on Fri Mar 17, 2006 6:20 am, edited 1 time in total.
Putting money into aviation is like wiping before you poop....it just don't make sense!
User avatar
cyyz
Rank 11
Rank 11
Posts: 4150
Joined: Mon Mar 15, 2004 11:05 am
Location: Toronto

Post by cyyz »

Since they'll all complain very shortly...

Mandate all schools to carry, 2 #1's, 2 #2s, 4 #3s and 2 #4s, and they need to increase 2s + 3s for every additional 4 they want to carry....

That way you won't go to a school where they're all class 4s... And the 1,2 and 3's would be getting paid more, since the school would be forced to keep them on staff..
---------- ADS -----------
 
User avatar
TenForTwelve
Rank 3
Rank 3
Posts: 115
Joined: Fri Jul 09, 2004 1:13 pm
Location: AB

Post by TenForTwelve »

It's all well and good to want to require instructors to have 500hrs or 1000hrs or whatever, but it won't change the fact that there's no $$ in instructing, and 1000hr instructors are gonna leave for charter jobs. People who are taking flying lessons most likely won't be willing to pay what it costs to keep good instructors; it's the whole Wal-Mart mentality, everything should be cheap.
---------- ADS -----------
 
User avatar
bizjet_mania
Rank 8
Rank 8
Posts: 982
Joined: Sun Apr 24, 2005 9:37 am

Post by bizjet_mania »

How about give more money to the instructors and less to the owners. :o
---------- ADS -----------
 
teacher
Rank 10
Rank 10
Posts: 2450
Joined: Thu Feb 19, 2004 3:25 pm

Post by teacher »

More experienced instructors = Better wages to keep instructors = Less people training = Less pilots looking for work = More jobs opinings = Better job security = Better salaries for pilots

Will it ever happen, not a chance.
---------- ADS -----------
 
w squared
Rank 10
Rank 10
Posts: 2040
Joined: Wed Apr 14, 2004 2:32 pm
Location: Somewhere in the patch

Post by w squared »

Most importantly:

If you require potential instructors to have enough hours that they CAN get another job, then the only folks that choose instructing will be the ones who WANT to be instructors. I think that we're fools if we ignore the effect that the motivation level and job satisfaction have on the quality of instruction. Look at the situation on the rotary wing side of the house when it comes to instruction - you can't get a job instructing right after you do your CPL. That means that the people who are instructing have some background in the industry, and they WANT to be where they are. They're also paid a wage that doesn't require becoming a Mr. Noodle expert.
---------- ADS -----------
 
Image

Please don't tell my mother that I work in the Oilpatch...she still thinks that I'm the piano player at a whorehouse.
User avatar
Dust Devil
Rank 11
Rank 11
Posts: 4027
Joined: Fri Jun 24, 2005 10:55 am
Location: Riderville

Post by Dust Devil »

bizjet_mania wrote:How about give more money to the instructors and less to the owners. :o
Because the instructors don't deserve it and the owners do.
---------- ADS -----------
 
//=S=//


A parent's only as good as their dumbest kid. If one wins a Nobel Prize but the other gets robbed by a hooker, you failed
User avatar
x-wind
Rank 7
Rank 7
Posts: 739
Joined: Sat Mar 26, 2005 10:23 pm
Location: Around

Post by x-wind »

More experienced instructors = Better wages to keep instructors = Less people training = Less pilots looking for work = More jobs opinings = Better job security = Better salaries for pilots

Will it ever happen, not a chance.
Response: Star your own Contrails.
---------- ADS -----------
 
User avatar
cyyz
Rank 11
Rank 11
Posts: 4150
Joined: Mon Mar 15, 2004 11:05 am
Location: Toronto

Post by cyyz »

But seriously lads, what's wrong with my idea? You need 5 other classes above 4 in order to employ a 4??? Or some other sort of ratio instead of 1 class 1 who looks after the schools 10 class 4s?
---------- ADS -----------
 
User avatar
Dust Devil
Rank 11
Rank 11
Posts: 4027
Joined: Fri Jun 24, 2005 10:55 am
Location: Riderville

Post by Dust Devil »

cyyz wrote:But seriously lads, what's wrong with my idea? You need 5 other classes above 4 in order to employ a 4??? Or some other sort of ratio instead of 1 class 1 who looks after the schools 10 class 4s?
Because it just adds more TC mandated bullshit to the mix. The problem with schools is not the quality of flight instructors but the lie that there is jobs for everyone and the practice of mass producing pilots.
---------- ADS -----------
 
//=S=//


A parent's only as good as their dumbest kid. If one wins a Nobel Prize but the other gets robbed by a hooker, you failed
sakism
Rank 5
Rank 5
Posts: 398
Joined: Tue Feb 17, 2004 7:32 am

Post by sakism »

teacher wrote:More experienced instructors = Better wages to keep instructors = Less people training = Less pilots looking for work = More jobs opinings = Better job security = Better salaries for pilots

Will it ever happen, not a chance.
More experienced instructors = Better wages to keep instructors = Less people training = Less revenue to flight schools = Lower wages to afford to stay in business = Less experienced instructors

It won't happen because it can't happen.
cyyz wrote:But seriously lads, what's wrong with my idea? You need 5 other classes above 4 in order to employ a 4??? Or some other sort of ratio instead of 1 class 1 who looks after the schools 10 class 4s?
What about the flight schools that have few aircraft? Instructor wages would still be low, only now they would not fly nearly as much.

What happens if no one of a higher class is available - is the school shut down?
---------- ADS -----------
 
User avatar
bob sacamano
Rank (9)
Rank (9)
Posts: 1680
Joined: Wed Jan 05, 2005 6:26 am
Location: I'm not in Kansas anymore

Post by bob sacamano »

sakism wrote:
teacher wrote:More experienced instructors = Better wages to keep instructors = Less people training = Less pilots looking for work = More jobs opinings = Better job security = Better salaries for pilots

Will it ever happen, not a chance.
More experienced instructors = Better wages to keep instructors = Less people training = Less revenue to flight schools = Lower wages to afford to stay in business = Less experienced instructors

It won't happen because it can't happen.
cyyz wrote:But seriously lads, what's wrong with my idea? You need 5 other classes above 4 in order to employ a 4??? Or some other sort of ratio instead of 1 class 1 who looks after the schools 10 class 4s?
What about the flight schools that have few aircraft? Instructor wages would still be low, only now they would not fly nearly as much.
Sakism you no longer belong in the flight training threads. Kindly guide yourself and your holier than thou attitude outta here.

P.S. Congrats on your.....200th post :wink:
sakism wrote:What happens if no one of a higher class is available - is the school shut down?
You hire a hipster doofus.
---------- ADS -----------
 
:smt109
User avatar
KAG
Rank 11
Rank 11
Posts: 3619
Joined: Wed Feb 18, 2004 11:24 pm

Post by KAG »

The system in Canada is set up so once you get a license it’s a license to learn anyway. Chances are your not going to be flogging around in something beyond you ability right out of school. Between insurance mins, CARS mins, and the shear number of pilots in Canada, you’re unlikely as a new pilot to get onto something beyond your ability as PIC.
Less than 1000 hours, other than instructing, your limited to VFR and most likely single engine (unless your two crew and a copilot). Get some time and then you can venture into the SPIFR world or something more complex.

So why only have experienced instructors teach if it’s a license to learn anyway? With that in mind, as a new instructor your supervised by someone with experience – instructional experience. Sure it’s not “industry time” but if our system is set up to take numerous small steps and learn as you go, why is it so imperative that we have 1000-hour class 4’s running around? It’s not, nor will it change.


Cheers.

PS. I'm speaking of students who want to fly for a living. I think the REC permit is a license to kill yourself, and PPL's (with no intent to continue to the CPL) should be taught by someone with higher experience.
---------- ADS -----------
 
The feet you step on today might be attached to the ass you're kissing tomorrow.
Chase lifestyle not metal.
duplicate2
Rank 5
Rank 5
Posts: 307
Joined: Tue Feb 17, 2004 10:54 am
Location: Limbo

Post by duplicate2 »

Shot in the dark here...

90% of the pilots on here were taught by someone with less than 1000 hours TT.

90% of the pilots on here think they are at least "above average" pilots.

Where are all the crappy pilots then?
---------- ADS -----------
 
. ._
Top Poster
Top Poster
Posts: 7374
Joined: Fri Feb 20, 2004 5:50 pm
Location: Cowering in my little room because the Water Cooler is locked.
Contact:

Post by . ._ »

I was gonna say...Naa.

Edited for stupidity. :dumbbig:
---------- ADS -----------
 
2R
Rank 11
Rank 11
Posts: 4328
Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2004 2:25 pm
Location: left coast

Post by 2R »

A similiar question is ' What happens when the lunatics run the loony bin ?' :ANAL: :ANAL: :ANAL:
---------- ADS -----------
 
Locked

Return to “The Water Cooler”